Shields up, Captain

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
http://www.engadget.com/2014/04/07/earthquake-shield/

In an experiment, the group was able to create the shield using several five-meter-deep boreholes in the ground. When a quake hits, the holes redirect vibrations to a less-populated nearby area so they'll do less damage. The catch is, all that force has to head somewhere. And we're guessing there won't be many towns signing up to have a big city's quake headed their way instead.

Pretty sure they could just redirect the force out along uninhabited areas, or dissipate of it that wouldn't be felt.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
59,142
9,583
126
Send them to Detroit. You'd never see it had been hit by a quake.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Send them to Detroit. You'd never see it had been hit by a quake.

Redirecting that much force from California to Detroit is a long way to go. I was thinking more like the uninhabited desert east of California and Nevada.
 

Jaepheth

Platinum Member
Apr 29, 2006
2,572
25
91
Redirecting that much force from California to Detroit is a long way to go. I was thinking more like the uninhabited desert east of California and Nevada.

Maybe that uninhabited desert is more valuable than Detroit?
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,997
126
Maybe that uninhabited desert is more valuable than Detroit?

Of course it is. The desert doesn't need to be torn down and have the fires extinguished to be a desert. It's already at square one. Detroit is in the negatives, it needs work to get back to square one.


If this really works and it is possible to redirect quakes you have to wonder about the sort of legal issues that arise. Is a city responsible if their quakes kills people somewhere else when the energy is intentionally directed there? Will nearby cities direct quakes at each other in a new form of seismic warfare?
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Of course it is. The desert doesn't need to be torn down and have the fires extinguished to be a desert. It's already at square one. Detroit is in the negatives, it needs work to get back to square one.


If this really works and it is possible to redirect quakes you have to wonder about the sort of legal issues that arise. Is a city responsible if their quakes kills people somewhere else when the energy is intentionally directed there? Will nearby cities direct quakes at each other in a new form of seismic warfare?

If only they could find a way to harness that seismic energy to generate electricity.
 

notposting

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2005
3,498
33
91
*waves hand frantically from Metro Detroit suburb*

I don't like where this thread is headed...
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
98,966
17,384
126
Obviously California should bounce the quake to the fault line, it should be deep enough for the quake to fall through right?
 

natto fire

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2000
7,117
10
76
So now instead of the mercy of California sliding into the Pacific, they are going to redirect the energy to trigger the super volcano under Yellowstone? Here's hoping France steps up their hatred of the United States to not share this research.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
So now instead of the mercy of California sliding into the Pacific, they are going to redirect the energy to trigger the super volcano under Yellowstone? Here's hoping France steps up their hatred of the United States to not share this research.
:awe:
 

Ruptga

Lifer
Aug 3, 2006
10,246
207
106
All you really need to read is the last paragraph of the physics article.
The authors are careful in pointing out the experimental and theoretical limitations of their work: the monochromatic and monodimensional gap as well the difficulty in modeling the top layer of the soil as an elastic medium. Yet the present experiment is indicative of the potential of using these acoustic-wave-manipulation strategies on a large scale, with an eye towards eventually realizing schemes for the mitigation of earthquake damage. However, it is worth noting that the scheme blocks and cloaks seismic surface waves by redirecting the wave energy elsewhere, which could worsen the earthquake’s effects in the area surrounding the protected region. But recent theoretical work [6] has suggested a better option: dampening of the seismic waves could be done by absorbing the energy carried by those waves or even transforming it into other forms of energy, which could be stored for useful purposes. While this remains only a distant vision, the present experiment has opened a door for such grand thoughts.

It's pretty cool research, but it's going to be a long time (decades) before we're able to redirect or absorb earthquakes to any degree.
 

DigDog

Lifer
Jun 3, 2011
14,329
2,793
126
Send them to Detroit. You'd never see it had been hit by a quake.
6a00e54f7fc4c58833015435ea12d9970c-250wi
 
Status
Not open for further replies.