Shfting from Drive to Low on automatics.

npoe1

Senior member
Jul 28, 2005
592
0
76
I would like to know if there is a problem if I change from D to L on my automatic car. I?ve been doing that to reduce speed as I get closer to intersections but I?m not sure if that could damage the transmission, because using less the brake doesn?t worth a transmission.

Thanks,
 

mooseracing

Golden Member
Mar 9, 2006
1,711
0
0
What gear is your low? And what gear is the transmission usually downshifting from? The higher the gear that you downshift from into L the more shock on the drivetrain itself. The transmission wear would be negligable as at a higher rpm from downshifting you would have increase fluid flow letting the clutches lock up harder, but then also as you downshift you are forcing the clutchpacks to grab quick and hard like dropping the clutch almost.

I don't downshift on a manual until I know I am out of range for the gear I am in, ie lugging the engine.
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
44
91
Unless you are on a long downhill grade it's not usually advisable to manually shift an automatic that was not designed to have a manual function. On a standard automatic it will cause extra wear on the clutchpacks as mooseracing said.

ZV
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
The auto won't actually shift down unless it's safe to do so anyway.

I will often drop a gear or two manually in my autos to slow down, but not all the way to first.

I have been doing it forever and haven't had any problems.

I never do it in slippery conditions, though.

I do it more out of habit, than for any specifc reason.

 

fstime

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2004
4,382
5
81
Yup, just use the brakes, no point in putting unnecessary stress on your transmission..
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
44
91
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
The auto won't actually shift down unless it's safe to do so anyway.

I will often drop a gear or two manually in my autos to slow down, but not all the way to first.

I have been doing it forever and haven't had any problems.

I never do it in slippery conditions, though.

I do it more out of habit, than for any specifc reason.

What you say is true of new , electronically-controlled automatics. Older automatics (some even into the mid 1990s, though that's rare) that used hydraulics as the primary control can be forced to downshift when it is not safe to do so. Even with newer automatics, I still don't recommend it unless there is a manual-shift functionality incorporated in the design of the transmission.

ZV
 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,158
59
91
I've never seen it hurt a thing. It won't wear the clutch packs anymore than upshifting will, at least on new cars. Obviously, there's some additional wear, since it's another shift, but unless you do it just all the time, it's not going to be a significant difference on most transmissions. Not like it's going to halve the life of the transmission.

Even on old non-electric transmissions, and I'll preface this by saying my experience with these are mostly with GM trannys like the Turbo 350 and 400, they wouldn't shift from Drive/3rd to Low/1st until you were slow enough for it not to make you lose control.
You can drive any car with one of those transmissions and run down the highway, drop it to Low and it'll go into Second...but not Low. If it did drop to Low at highway speeds, you'd either lock the drive tires up, or over-rev the engine.
In fact, they will actually upshift on their own if you run them too fast in Low, with the shifter still in the Low position.
 

npoe1

Senior member
Jul 28, 2005
592
0
76
I have a Ford Fusion SEL V6 and what Low does is just switch the gears at 5,000 RPM instead of doing it at 2,000 RPM but I have got until 5th gear on Low. The Transmission just downshifts from 6th to 5th and so on.
 

Nyati13

Senior member
Jan 2, 2003
785
1
76
Newer design automatics already have built in engine braking functions. By trying to manually control it, you would be knocking the transmission out of it's software controlled mode ( which is usually the best state the transmission can acheive already) and decreasing the engine braking effect you are trying to achieve.
You bought an automatic.... stick it in D and just leave it there. :D
 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,158
59
91
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Newer design automatics already have built in engine braking functions. By trying to manually control it, you would be knocking the transmission out of it's software controlled mode ( which is usually the best state the transmission can acheive already) and decreasing the engine braking effect you are trying to achieve.
You bought an automatic.... stick it in D and just leave it there. :D
Now that's totally wrong. No car with an automatic will help you slow down much. You certainly will never get engine or compression (as some call it) by leaving one in D.

But if you downshift you will.
 

yelo333

Senior member
Dec 13, 2003
990
0
71
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Newer design automatics already have built in engine braking functions. By trying to manually control it, you would be knocking the transmission out of it's software controlled mode ( which is usually the best state the transmission can acheive already) and decreasing the engine braking effect you are trying to achieve.
You bought an automatic.... stick it in D and just leave it there. :D
Now that's totally wrong. No car with an automatic will help you slow down much. You certainly will never get engine or compression (as some call it) by leaving one in D.

But if you downshift you will.

I think some, like current gen civic, will automatically downshift to hold your speed when you are going down a hill.

Also, don't forget about CVTs. The Dodge Caliber I drove had quite an aggressive amount of deceleration when you took your foot off the throttle.

At any rate, brakes are relatively cheap compared to transmissions ... Plus, when you brake, you get the added bonus that those fancy lights in back light up. Make it easy for the cell-phone-talking tailgater behind you. :)
 

npoe1

Senior member
Jul 28, 2005
592
0
76
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Newer design automatics already have built in engine braking functions. By trying to manually control it, you would be knocking the transmission out of it's software controlled mode ( which is usually the best state the transmission can acheive already) and decreasing the engine braking effect you are trying to achieve.
You bought an automatic.... stick it in D and just leave it there. :D

I bought the automatic because there was no standard on that version of the car :( I love standard although they are a rare breed now.
 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Newer design automatics already have built in engine braking functions. By trying to manually control it, you would be knocking the transmission out of it's software controlled mode ( which is usually the best state the transmission can acheive already) and decreasing the engine braking effect you are trying to achieve.
You bought an automatic.... stick it in D and just leave it there. :D
Now that's totally wrong. No car with an automatic will help you slow down much. You certainly will never get engine or compression (as some call it) by leaving one in D.

But if you downshift you will.

The automatic in my 2003 Accord V6 will downshift one or even two gears if you brake on a steady decline. You can then let off the brake and the transmission will hold the gear until you get on the gas lightly again or the hill levels out and your speed starts dropping significantly. Then it will upshift back to the regular cruising gear for that speed. If you get back on the gas hard for a pass, it will continue to hold the shorter gear for passing power.

After ~45,000 miles of driving it, I could count on one hand the number of times that it has been in the wrong gear at the wrong time. Even under hard driving, it seems to have E.S.P. and is downshifting before the apex.

Unfortunately, it's made of brittle glass. ;)

OP, just leave it in "D" and use the brake if you need to do so. I know it is tempting, but my experience is that automatics are best left to their own devices (pardon the pun) unless you need to utilize 2nd-gear start functions.
 

npoe1

Senior member
Jul 28, 2005
592
0
76
I will resist the temptation and only use D, but the sound of a decelerating engine is one of the sweetest things in the world.
 

bruceb

Diamond Member
Aug 20, 2004
8,874
111
106
I dp that on my GM on steep downgrades. But only from
"D" down to "3" and then to "2" if needed. In "2" I try
to keep car speed to under 35-40MPH or about 3000RPM
max. That is a fairly safe range and still gives good engine
braking. I have the 3800 V6 with the 4 speed auto transaxle..
No issues at all.
 

DougK62

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2001
8,035
6
81
It's an automatic, just leave it in D and use your brakes. You really want to move the shifter around as little as possible. If you like the sound of gearing down then get a car with a manual transmission.

 

Nyati13

Senior member
Jan 2, 2003
785
1
76
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Newer design automatics already have built in engine braking functions. By trying to manually control it, you would be knocking the transmission out of it's software controlled mode ( which is usually the best state the transmission can acheive already) and decreasing the engine braking effect you are trying to achieve.
You bought an automatic.... stick it in D and just leave it there. :D
Now that's totally wrong. No car with an automatic will help you slow down much. You certainly will never get engine or compression (as some call it) by leaving one in D.

But if you downshift you will.

Nope, completely right. Despite my lifelong hatred of automatic transmissions, even I have to admit that recent automatic designs are almost as good as a manual transmission. The engineers have closed a lot of the gaps that autos used to suffer from.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
I recently rented a Grand Cherokee with the 5 speed auto manumatic. It was a lot of fun downshifting to slow down. Of course it was set up to be shifted that way.

My 1997 Z24 has been aggressively downshifted since I bought it new. Sounds wonderful and I love to do it. In fact, I'll be dropping it down into 2nd some more today. When's the tranny gonna break? :D

Can't recall ever having an auto transmission problem on any car I have owned save one, and that was a 1995 Taurus SE recall that was unrelated to my downshifting.

 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,158
59
91
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Newer design automatics already have built in engine braking functions. By trying to manually control it, you would be knocking the transmission out of it's software controlled mode ( which is usually the best state the transmission can acheive already) and decreasing the engine braking effect you are trying to achieve.
You bought an automatic.... stick it in D and just leave it there. :D
Now that's totally wrong. No car with an automatic will help you slow down much. You certainly will never get engine or compression (as some call it) by leaving one in D.

But if you downshift you will.

Nope, completely right. Despite my lifelong hatred of automatic transmissions, even I have to admit that recent automatic designs are almost as good as a manual transmission. The engineers have closed a lot of the gaps that autos used to suffer from.
Then I evidently haven't driven one, then. If they are making them like that, it's about time.

To get any REAL engine braking though, you'll still need to manually downshift.
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
Unless you're going down a LONG hill just let the transmission do what it was designed to do and use the brakes for what they were designed to do. The only reason you should consider using engine braking in an automatic is if you're going down something that threatens to overheat the brakes. There was a couple mile long hill that I had to drive pretty often. I'd downshift going down that because I'm not sure the corolla's brakes would have liked it.
 

2dt Drifter

Senior member
May 23, 2007
253
0
0
My 04' Grand Cherokee and my 94' Cherokee both have auto trans and both have Over Drive on/off buttons. I'm surprised no one has brought it up? I live in Colorado and driving in the mountains every weekend I constantly turn off O/D for going up and down hills. get a little jump on the higher RPM's before climbing a hill and using the engine to give me a constant deceleration rate so i dont lay on the the brakes for 1/4 mile going down hills.

by all means if the vehicle has an O/D on off switch use it when you need it, thats why they made it.
 

Nyati13

Senior member
Jan 2, 2003
785
1
76
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Newer design automatics already have built in engine braking functions. By trying to manually control it, you would be knocking the transmission out of it's software controlled mode ( which is usually the best state the transmission can acheive already) and decreasing the engine braking effect you are trying to achieve.
You bought an automatic.... stick it in D and just leave it there. :D
Now that's totally wrong. No car with an automatic will help you slow down much. You certainly will never get engine or compression (as some call it) by leaving one in D.

But if you downshift you will.

Nope, completely right. Despite my lifelong hatred of automatic transmissions, even I have to admit that recent automatic designs are almost as good as a manual transmission. The engineers have closed a lot of the gaps that autos used to suffer from.
Then I evidently haven't driven one, then. If they are making them like that, it's about time.

To get any REAL engine braking though, you'll still need to manually downshift.

A lot of the newer designs are getting fancy with their software packages, so autos keep getting closer to manuals every year.

 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,158
59
91
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Newer design automatics already have built in engine braking functions. By trying to manually control it, you would be knocking the transmission out of it's software controlled mode ( which is usually the best state the transmission can acheive already) and decreasing the engine braking effect you are trying to achieve.
You bought an automatic.... stick it in D and just leave it there. :D
Now that's totally wrong. No car with an automatic will help you slow down much. You certainly will never get engine or compression (as some call it) by leaving one in D.

But if you downshift you will.

Nope, completely right. Despite my lifelong hatred of automatic transmissions, even I have to admit that recent automatic designs are almost as good as a manual transmission. The engineers have closed a lot of the gaps that autos used to suffer from.
Then I evidently haven't driven one, then. If they are making them like that, it's about time.

To get any REAL engine braking though, you'll still need to manually downshift.

A lot of the newer designs are getting fancy with their software packages, so autos keep getting closer to manuals every year.
Yeah, that's why the gas mileage difference from auto to manual in the same vehicle these days is either the same or very little difference.