Originally posted by: Creig
Originally posted by: Crusader
This is great news. Patents need to be protected from the apparant disregard for the law that ATI previously engaged in. License it you lowly dogs.. Nvidia did.
This type of lawless behavior in this day and age is disgusting.
Nvidia hit with patent infringement lawsuit
19th September 2006
Nvidia has been accused of patent infringement. Minneapolis-based Scanner Technologies claims it owns techniques that the GPU maker uses in the manufacture of ball grid array (BGA) chip-pin layouts without its permission. It said the alleged infringement was "willful and deliberate".
This is great news. Patents need to be protected from the apparant disregard for the law that Nvidia engages in. License it you lowly dogs... This type of lawless behavior in this day and age is disgusting.
We can go back and forth like this all day if you'd like. But instead, why don't you grow up a bit, realize that neither company is employed by angels/devils and just enjoy the new toys they both make.
Originally posted by: Crusader
Originally posted by: Creig
Originally posted by: Crusader
This is great news. Patents need to be protected from the apparant disregard for the law that ATI previously engaged in. License it you lowly dogs.. Nvidia did.
This type of lawless behavior in this day and age is disgusting.
Nvidia hit with patent infringement lawsuit
19th September 2006
Nvidia has been accused of patent infringement. Minneapolis-based Scanner Technologies claims it owns techniques that the GPU maker uses in the manufacture of ball grid array (BGA) chip-pin layouts without its permission. It said the alleged infringement was "willful and deliberate".
This is great news. Patents need to be protected from the apparant disregard for the law that Nvidia engages in. License it you lowly dogs... This type of lawless behavior in this day and age is disgusting.
We can go back and forth like this all day if you'd like. But instead, why don't you grow up a bit, realize that neither company is employed by angels/devils and just enjoy the new toys they both make.
We could, but you have a crap computer and dont own half the new hardware that comes out soo... yeah. And the fact ist hat you post old news, this is current news and the discussion... so while YOU might want to go back and forth, that just shows your need to "defend" ATI.
This isnt about ATI vs Nvidia creig. This is about SGIs lawsuit against a failed company.
So on planet fanboy you're not qualified to discuss hardware unless you own new tech? Yeah okay FX-55 boy.Originally posted by: Crusader
We could, but you have a crap computer and dont own half the new hardware that comes out soo... yeah.
Originally posted by: Ulfhednar
So on planet fanboy you're not qualified to discuss hardware unless you own new tech? Yeah okay FX-55 boy.Originally posted by: Crusader
We could, but you have a crap computer and dont own half the new hardware that comes out soo... yeah.![]()
LOL, you've just revealed yourself as the dumbest person ever to grace these forums.Originally posted by: Crusader
I'm a video fanboy, not CPU.
If its true that I wont get the most FPS out of my 8800GTX with the FX55.. I'll upgrade.
AAANNnnnndddd HIGHLY likely to pwn your CPU if and when I do.
In the meantime, just know I'll ALWAYS have a faster GPU than you do, or ever will. Esp if you continue to stick with ATI.![]()
Originally posted by: Ulfhednar
LOL, you've just revealed yourself as the dumbest person ever to grace these forums.Originally posted by: Crusader
I'm a video fanboy, not CPU.
If its true that I wont get the most FPS out of my 8800GTX with the FX55.. I'll upgrade.
AAANNnnnndddd HIGHLY likely to pwn your CPU if and when I do.
In the meantime, just know I'll ALWAYS have a faster GPU than you do, or ever will. Esp if you continue to stick with ATI.![]()
I honestly couldn't give a crap about your CPU or if you get one faster than mine, I was simply using your own logic (or lack of) against you.
As for always having a faster GPU than me, I couldn't care less about that either, but good luck because I buy Nvidia too, dumbass.![]()
LOL, are you 8? 9? I think I made it clear I don't give a crap about "beating" anybody or them "beating" me. I buy hardware to play games, that's it.Originally posted by: Crusader
Because if you were in on getting a G80.. if you bought 1 G80 and I will buy 2, just to pwn you. We can compete all day and you will lose. Just to let you know.
I'm sure you do have a lot more money in Ameritrade, I'm from Britain.Originally posted by: Crusader
But its good you dont care, because I am likely to have far more money sitting in my bank account and ameritrade accounts than you do. Just to let you know, I dont want to have to break you.
You were saying what about other people using prejudice remarks? :laugh:Originally posted by: Crusader
I notice you are from the UK limey.. this is the USA, you are messing with some big money heavyweights.
Originally posted by: Crusader
Just to let you know, I dont want to have to break you.
Originally posted by: schneiderguy
Originally posted by: Crusader
Just to let you know, I dont want to have to break you.
:Q:Q:Q:Q
Ulfhednar, you better be scared, crusader is going to smack you across the head with his 7900gtx :Q:Q:Q
In the meantime, just know I'll ALWAYS have a faster GPU than you do, or ever will.
LOL you called me a "limey," what does that have to do with noting financial differences except that you're a hypocritical and jingoist little muppet?Originally posted by: Crusader
Nothing prejudice about noting financial differences. Thats from your laziness, it just so happens that you represent your nation. Thats not an inherent trait you are born with, its a way of life.. so its not prejudice. Unless its not ok to make comments towards lazy people, who certainly could change their lifestyle if you wanted to. But apparantly you arent interested so.![]()
Oh believe me, I am absolutely quaking in fear here...Originally posted by: schneiderguy
:Q:Q:Q:QOriginally posted by: Crusader
Just to let you know, I dont want to have to break you.
Ulfhednar, you better be scared, crusader is going to smack you across the head with his 7900gtx :Q:Q:Q
Originally posted by: Paratus
Gstanfor I knew Rollo & you sir ARE NO ROLLO!
![]()
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Gstanfor
Check out one of the other threads apoppin - nvidia has already acquired a company with CPU expertise and much as I've always liked AMD and their CPU products if nvidia brings a CPU to the table in future I'll not think twice about turning my back on the AMD product.
yes . . . old news ... Stexar
it could very well signal the End of nvidia as an independent company. After intel/AMD [and maybe IBM] get thru with them someone will pick up the pieces in a fire sale.
imo they have bitten off far more than they can chew. ... like you, they are despised by their peers for their aggressiveness . . . it'll be interesting to see how this plays out
i started a thread about it in CPU Forum . . . days ago . . check it out . . . it's an interesting read . . . i'm off to work . . . i look forward to you comments
not
anyway ...
Nvidia at work on combined CPU with graphic - On 65nm in 2008
peace and aloha
Originally posted by: Crusader
Originally posted by: Ulfhednar
LOL, you've just revealed yourself as the dumbest person ever to grace these forums.Originally posted by: Crusader
I'm a video fanboy, not CPU.
If its true that I wont get the most FPS out of my 8800GTX with the FX55.. I'll upgrade.
AAANNnnnndddd HIGHLY likely to pwn your CPU if and when I do.
In the meantime, just know I'll ALWAYS have a faster GPU than you do, or ever will. Esp if you continue to stick with ATI.![]()
I honestly couldn't give a crap about your CPU or if you get one faster than mine, I was simply using your own logic (or lack of) against you.
As for always having a faster GPU than me, I couldn't care less about that either, but good luck because I buy Nvidia too, dumbass.![]()
Thats good you dont care. For you.
Because if you were in on getting a G80.. if you bought 1 G80 and I will buy 2, just to pwn you. We can compete all day and you will lose. Just to let you know.
But its good you dont care, because I am likely to have far more money sitting in my bank account and ameritrade accounts than you do. Just to let you know, I dont want to have to break you.
If I was foolish with my money, I'd already had bought a C2D instead of a $139 FX55. But I'm more than willing to show you that you are nothing in the scheme of life and money. I usually wouldnt issue such a childish challenge, but for you Mr." I-Paint-My-Fingernails-Black".. anything.
I notice you are from the UK limey.. this is the USA, you are messing with some big money heavyweights.
Originally posted by: jiffylube1024
Originally posted by: Gstanfor
Tech Report article
B3D forum discussion link
The patent in question, known as U.S. patent 6,650,327, was filed all the way back in June 1998 and covers a "display system having floating point rasterization and floating point framebuffering."
and no, nvidia won't be sued, because unlike ATi they licenced the technology from SGI.
Its good to know (the former) Ati's business principles are mired as deep in the sewer system as their PR is.
^ When you're as demented as Gsanfor, everything negative goes towards your thesis (in his case, he repeatedly says that ATI's business practise is "rooted in the sweers"), everything positive goes ignored, everything positive Nvidia does is a cause for jubilation, and everything negative done by Nvidia is perfectly justifiable because it's 'not as bad' as what ATI does.
Get a life man, and quit being so petty about video cards. Sheesh.
How about the countless lawsuits against Microsoft, Intel, etc. If you're a big company, smaller companies want a piece of you. That's business.
Originally posted by: apoppin
what NO comment about the END of Nvidia
looks they are heading into BIZG trouble
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Gstanfor
Check out one of the other threads apoppin - nvidia has already acquired a company with CPU expertise and much as I've always liked AMD and their CPU products if nvidia brings a CPU to the table in future I'll not think twice about turning my back on the AMD product.
yes . . . old news ... Stexar
it could very well signal the End of nvidia as an independent company. After intel/AMD [and maybe IBM] get thru with them someone will pick up the pieces in a fire sale.
imo they have bitten off far more than they can chew. ... like you, they are despised by their peers for their aggressiveness . . . it'll be interesting to see how this plays out
i started a thread about it in CPU Forum . . . days ago . . check it out . . . it's an interesting read . . . i'm off to work . . . i look forward to you comments
not
anyway ...
Nvidia at work on combined CPU with graphic - On 65nm in 2008
peace and aloha
Originally posted by: Crusader
Originally posted by: Creig
We can go back and forth like this all day if you'd like. But instead, why don't you grow up a bit, realize that neither company is employed by angels/devils and just enjoy the new toys they both make.
We could, but you have a crap computer and dont own half the new hardware that comes out soo... yeah.
Originally posted by: Crusader
And the fact ist hat you post old news, this is current news and the discussion...
I'm not defending anybody, just showing that both companies seem to operate under the same principles. You, on the other hand, have some weird compulsion to attack ATI and defend Nvidia.Originally posted by: Crusader
so while YOU might want to go back and forth, that just shows your need to "defend" ATI.
Do you have short-term memory retention problems? YOU JUST GOT DONE SAYING, "This is great news. Patents need to be protected from the apparant disregard for the law that ATI previously engaged in. License it you lowly dogs.. Nvidia did. This type of lawless behavior in this day and age is disgusting."Originally posted by: Crusader
This isnt about ATI vs Nvidia creig. This is about SGIs lawsuit against a failed company.
Originally posted by: Gstanfor
Originally posted by: apoppin
what NO comment about the END of Nvidia
looks they are heading into BIZG trouble
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Gstanfor
Check out one of the other threads apoppin - nvidia has already acquired a company with CPU expertise and much as I've always liked AMD and their CPU products if nvidia brings a CPU to the table in future I'll not think twice about turning my back on the AMD product.
yes . . . old news ... Stexar
it could very well signal the End of nvidia as an independent company. After intel/AMD [and maybe IBM] get thru with them someone will pick up the pieces in a fire sale.
imo they have bitten off far more than they can chew. ... like you, they are despised by their peers for their aggressiveness . . . it'll be interesting to see how this plays out
i started a thread about it in CPU Forum . . . days ago . . check it out . . . it's an interesting read . . . i'm off to work . . . i look forward to you comments
not
anyway ...
Nvidia at work on combined CPU with graphic - On 65nm in 2008
peace and aloha
LOL! if a company such as AMD (with clueless management) can compete against intel and grow, then I'm afraid nvidia will eat intel alive when it does start competing with them.
Originally posted by: Gstanfor
Originally posted by: BFG10K
I don't think the problem is the topic, it's your behaviour.
It's no worse than what the fanatics have dished out across the web over the years, and I've fought a damn sight cleaner than them.
Can't stomach their own medicine. Pathetic weaklings.
Then why didn't Nvidia just buyout ATI? If Nvidia is as unstoppable as you make them out to be, why didn't they put up the dough and use their superior managing skills to purchase their closest competitor?LOL! if a company such as AMD (with clueless management) can compete against intel and grow, then I'm afraid nvidia will eat intel alive when it does start competing with them.
