Originally posted by: Vinfinite
never heard of em
SGI = tons of cool but proprietary equipment that costs 5-10 times the competition for the same performance.Originally posted by: Vinfinite
never heard of em
Originally posted by: phantom309
Yeah - the remake of the movie "Lost in Space" was like a 90-minute long Silicon Graphics ad.
Originally posted by: Vinfinite
never heard of em
Originally posted by: dullard
SGI = tons of cool but proprietary equipment that costs 5-10 times the competition for the same performance.Originally posted by: Vinfinite
never heard of em
It was inevitable. I've been saying for years in threads here that SGI and Sun are eventually going to disappear. Sure they'll struggle for years, maybe a decade. But they are on their way out. Small batches of specialized electronic equipment just doesn't cut it in this economy. The R&D costs are just too prohibitive.
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: dullard
SGI = tons of cool but proprietary equipment that costs 5-10 times the competition for the same performance.Originally posted by: Vinfinite
never heard of em
It was inevitable. I've been saying for years in threads here that SGI and Sun are eventually going to disappear. Sure they'll struggle for years, maybe a decade. But they are on their way out. Small batches of specialized electronic equipment just doesn't cut it in this economy. The R&D costs are just too prohibitive.
I don't think Sun will end the same way.
Chances are, they'll eventually turn into a smaller version of HP, selling system, small and big, storage, etc, but all using IA32/AMD64 CPU's, keeping the SPARC legacy around for as long as there's a need, then canning it.
SGI...who knows, restructuring, getting bought out...
Originally posted by: Aquila76
It's sad to see one of the biggest pioneers in CG go south like this. But I'm also impressed that standard PC's can now take the place of these workhorses, which I'm assuming is the main cause of SGI's fall - no need for ultra-expensive proprietary equipment.
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: Vinfinite
never heard of em
never heard of Silicon Graphics?
where have you been under a rock?
this sucks.. SGI rocked.. but they spent way too much on all thier flashy campus's in Silicon valley.. I swear half the buildings out there seem to belong to them an HP.
Even if Sun does all that, the Sun as we know it would be gone (which is basically my point).Originally posted by: Sunner
I don't think Sun will end the same way.
Chances are, they'll eventually turn into a smaller version of HP, selling system, small and big, storage, etc, but all using IA32/AMD64 CPU's, keeping the SPARC legacy around for as long as there's a need, then canning it.
Originally posted by: dullard
Even if Sun does all that, the Sun as we know it would be gone (which is basically my point).Originally posted by: Sunner
I don't think Sun will end the same way.
Chances are, they'll eventually turn into a smaller version of HP, selling system, small and big, storage, etc, but all using IA32/AMD64 CPU's, keeping the SPARC legacy around for as long as there's a need, then canning it.
For the heck of it, I just looked up Sun's financial info:
Year: Net income (losses in parenthesis)
2001: $927M
2002: ($587M)
2003: ($3,384M)
2004: ($388M)
2005: ($107M)
So maybe for now, they might have stemmed the losses. But it still is 4 straight years without a profit. A business like that won't stay around forever in its current state. Sure, Sun has tons of assets, so it'll be around for a long time. I just can't see it staying for 20 years without a massive overhaul into a completely different company from what we know now.
Originally posted by: dullard
I just can't see it staying for 20 years without a massive overhaul into a completely different company from what we know now.
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Without SGI we might not have high-performance hardware-independent 3D programming. SGI created SGL which led to OpenGL which prompted MS to create Direct3D.