SF passes non-biding resolution condemning Israel.

DucatiMonster696

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2009
4,269
1
71
Is this the new in thing among liberals nowadays?

Condemning the Middle-east's only democratic nation in order to show solidarity toward Hamas a terrorist jew hating organization and the people who voted them into power? Just when you thought SF politics couldn't sink any lower, especially after the AZ debacle.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/06/15


Tension in S.F. over anti-Israel resolution

Rachel Gordon, Chronicle Staff Writer

Wednesday, June 16, 2010


(06-16) 08:45 PDT SAN FRANCISCO -- Tensions soared at City Hall on Tuesday over a nonbinding resolution calling for the condemnation of the Israeli military's deadly raid on a flotilla headed for Gaza.

At least nine people were killed by Israeli naval commandos during the May 31 raid on ships carrying aid for the isolated Gaza region, which is under an Israeli blockade.

The legislation, sponsored by Supervisors John Avalos and Sophie Maxwell, has more than two dozen "whereas" clauses.

It attempts to localize the attack that took place a half-a-world away by noting San Francisco's "recognition and understanding of our population's unique relationship to international struggles and the overall principle that human life, whether here or abroad, has value and dignity."

After more than four hours of public testimony that lasted until nearly midnight, the Board of Supervisors didn't vote on the resolution. Instead, the supervisors sent it to committee, where critics hoped it would die.

Although the legislation carries no legal weight, it took on an importance in the world of public relations, providing a forum for the contentious Israeli-Palestinian debate to be heard. Both sides flooded the supervisors with e-mails, phone calls and personal visits.

Avalos acknowledged that there are "so many different realities, so many different sides," but was not ready to back down from the legislation he helped draft.

"I've been told that this resolution is divisive," he said. "But really it acknowledges the disproportionate power the state of Israel has to create a blockade and enforce it on the high seas, even to the extent of attacking civilians in the dead of night."

Just what happened on those high seas and what led to the deadly confrontation is a matter of debate, with conflicting accounts still being sorted out.

The proposed resolution has inserted San Francisco into the conflict.

"San Francisco is an extremely important symbol; it represents freedom and idealism, and no one wants to see that symbol hijacked," said Akiva Tor, Israel's consul general for the Pacific Northwest region, who planted himself on a bench outside the supervisors' chamber, waiting for the resolution to be heard.

"It may be a nonbinding resolution, but people are paying attention," he said.

Lubna Morrar, who works with the Palestinian Youth Network and the Arab Resource and Organizing Center, agreed that many are watching what San Francisco does with what quickly flared into a divisive issue.

"It is very important for the city of San Francisco to take a stand on this," she said. "This resolution can be a steppingstone for human rights all over the world."

Before the board meeting, both sides of the debate squared off during dueling noon-time rallies outside City Hall. At times, uniformed sheriff's deputies had to step in to separate people when the in-your-face arguing got precariously close to physical confrontation. One man blew a shofar, a horn used for Jewish religious purposes, to try to drown out speakers condemning Israel.
 
Last edited:

Argo

Lifer
Apr 8, 2000
10,045
0
0
I thought states weren't allowed to be involved in diplomatic relations per our Constitution...
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
I think the general term used is that Israel is the only *stable* democracy in the Middle East.

And what the fuck is wrong with San Fransisco? Well what does it mean that the city is regarding Israel _better_ than it is regarding Arizona... not sure which way to analyze it...
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Um, Turkey is in Europe. Iraq is democratic (at least as long as American and British guns are aimed at them), Egypt is still somewhat democratic, and Lebanon still has some vestiges of democracy, albeit democracy with Hamas and Syria murdering the candidates they don't like.
 

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
Actually Iraq seems relatively democratic now days.
Lebanon too, but the Arab-bashers have no regard for reality, hence the reason the bring up democracy as if that could somehow excuse incessant and flagrant violations of international law.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
So you aren't allowed to criticize democracies? How about you right wingers stop criticizing America? Love it or leave it.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
So you aren't allowed to criticize democracies? How about you right wingers stop criticizing America? Love it or leave it.

Ya, any criticism of Israel is automatically wrong, because they're a democracy. They can do nothing wrong. That's the atgument that was posted.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Anti-semites!

They're not nazis. They're nihilists.

lebowski+-+nihilists.jpg
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
Wait... so condemning a specific military action that resulted in the death of people is now "showing solidarity toward Hamas a terrorist jew hating organization and the people who voted them into power". Man, you really are delusional.

San Fransisco is full of loony lefty nuts, so it doesn't ever surprise me when they do stupid things, but you Israel supporters sure are a paranoid lot.