SETI: New portable cruncher

Surge On

Member
Apr 29, 2005
79
0
0
I have a T41 with a 1.5 GHz processor and with the seti driver my times are approx. 2hrs 15 min. so expect good things.
 

lane42

Diamond Member
Sep 3, 2000
5,721
624
126
Nice conjur :)

I think smoke has a 1.7 and gets around 2 hours or less on his lap.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Uhh...these are from WUs downloaded directly from SETI, not thru a queue:

Average CPU Time: 50m19s

That's for 12 WUs!

:Q :Q :Q :Q



Oh wait...more detail:
2005 May 27 09:47pm 19.425,28.39 0.7 Laptop 0:02

2005 May 27 09:47pm 3.355,15.64 0.438 Laptop 0:58

2005 May 27 09:46pm 5.093,28.56 1.211 Laptop 1:25

2005 May 27 09:46pm 5.539,27.43 0.972 Laptop 0:02

2005 May 27 09:46pm 5.539,27.43 0.972 Laptop 1:39

2005 May 27 09:46pm 5.423,27.88 1.086 Laptop 0:49

2005 May 27 09:46pm 5.29,28.27 1.259 Laptop 0:01

2005 May 27 09:45pm 5.161,28.49 1.119 Laptop 0:02

2005 May 27 09:45pm 5.024,28.59 1.219 Laptop 1:25

2005 May 27 09:44pm 7.692,16.06 0.458 Laptop 1:52

2005 May 27 09:44pm 12.176,25.91 0.824 Laptop 1:48

2005 May 27 09:43pm 4.819,28.43 1.174 Laptop 0:01
 

Smoke

Distributed Computing Elite Member
Jan 3, 2001
12,650
207
106
Originally posted by: lane42
Nice conjur :)

I think smoke has a 1.7 and gets around 2 hours or less on his lap.
"gg" is correct. :)

Here is a clip from my SetiQueue.

Smoke - Centrino 13.61 Avg WUs @ Day; 14 WUs Yesterday; 4 WUs so far today; 1h45m Average CPU; 23m04s last reported WU; 10 WUs in cache *

*1.7 GHz Centrino from Power NoteBooks

 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Well...the average has settled up a bit to 1:18. I guess those bad WUs were throwing me off a bit. :)
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: CheesePoofs
:Q Is it just me, or is that faster than every desktop processor?
I guess it's a monster laptop.

Here are the last set of WUs:

2005 May 29 06:18pm 10.133,26.48 1.529 Laptop 1:24

2005 May 29 06:18pm 10.885,28.45 7.637 Laptop 1:21

2005 May 29 06:18pm 10.987,28.59 3.594 Laptop 1:21

2005 May 29 06:18pm 5.702,9.3 0.443 Laptop 1:51

2005 May 29 06:18pm 3.942,19.44 0.506 Laptop 1:52

2005 May 29 06:18pm 4.186,11.14 0.577 Laptop 1:48
 

Assimilator1

Elite Member
Nov 4, 1999
24,165
524
126
Originally posted by: CheesePoofs
:Q Is it just me, or is that faster than every desktop processor?


Not quite;) ,a P4 HT is faster in total WU output (with 2 S@H instances) but yes the Pentium M is a fast CPU :) ,it compares well to the Ath64s
 

CheesePoofs

Diamond Member
Dec 5, 2004
3,163
0
0
Originally posted by: Assimilator1
Originally posted by: CheesePoofs
:Q Is it just me, or is that faster than every desktop processor?


Not quite;) ,a P4 HT is faster in total WU output (with 2 S@H instances) but yes the Pentium M is a fast CPU :) ,it compares well to the Ath64s

Thats strange. My A64 overclocked to 2.4 (from 1.8) seems to average about 1:50 for a WU. :( Could that be because I run other programs (firefox with 5+ tabs, outlook, sometimes itunes) while seti is running?
 

Assimilator1

Elite Member
Nov 4, 1999
24,165
524
126
Well that may be adding a little ,but like I(we) said the Pentium M rocks ;) ,I think it is a little more efficient than A64s