• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Seti: Just Wondering if

lane42

Diamond Member
Any one else is getting a new line in there work_unit folders. Under the angle_range line there's a line that say's True_angle_range. Iv'e never seen this before, and only 2 work units in my cache have these lines.
 
I saw something about this on the S@H msg. boards the other day. I think someone gave an explaination, i don't recall. Apparently it's new in the work unit file.
I'll see if i can find that thread again.
 
Inquiring minds want to know more😉

I've got over 170 WUs stored here & I don't plan to look through them all ! ,what date were these WUs recorded on?
 
Use Windows Search to find files containing true_angle_range and see what it comes up with 🙂
 
I have a wu recorded April 9th with true AR, and a wu recorded April 8th without. I also have a true angle range from march 20, A monster 18 AR.
 
My system is working on a reobservation unit at the moment, and there's no reference to true_angle_range.
 
I just checked 8 WU's from SETI Driver. 3 of them had the true AR line, from March 18, 19 & April 8. In the April 8 one, the true AR & AR were the same.

Anyone tried Roelof's newest SETI Spy? He said it was a special release for the reobserved WU's. Maybe that would shed a little light???
 
Back
Top