Ben98SentraSE
Senior member
I have been running Seti like I normally do on 6 extra machines at work. Where each machine would do a WU in just under 8 hours, after 7 hours each one is at either 65% or 66%. So on NT4 on PIII-450's with 6 systems working on 6 different WU's, I think it's safe to say that with this configuration GUI 3.0 is about 1/3 slower than 2.70. And I have it NOT to run as a screen saver but simply to run all the time in the background. And the systems are just sitting there doing nothing but Seti like every weekend.