Originally posted by: Sunrise089
Wow, never had so many replies so fast
Yes, this is fine. It also accounts for 1% of the people who are upgrading. Let me officially say those with 30" displays are a special exception to my criticism.Originally posted by: Nightmare225
What, the ability to game at 2560x1600 with 4xAA doesn't count?
Twice as fast on the exact same games is my point, plus twice as fast as an already playable resolution.Originally posted by: Matt2
Superior image quality + over twice as fast isnt worth it?
I seem to remember people dropping their Nvidia 7-Series cards like hot cakes for R580. The performance difference between G70 and R580 was no where near as large as G80 is offering now.
People jumped to R580 because
1) Nothing better was on the horizon
2) There were more games (IMHO) that went from not playable to playable at common resolutions from a 7800GT to a X1900XT than from an X1900XT to a 8800GTX.
3) They didn't pay $650, and they could sell their cards for close to the cost of the R580 part. The total cost to upgrade was quite a bit less.
Originally posted by: Mysteriouskk
Should I replace my EVGA 7900GTO for the GTS or GTX? I can trade it in to EVGAs website using their trade up program and get $250 off. Worth it?
Originally posted by: Midwayman
'cause I have a crappy x800xl and dont want to bother upgrading twice?
Originally posted by: theprodigalrebel
Performs like 7900GTX SLI/X1950 Crossfire but a few hundred less.
Seriously, what's not to like about a card that lets you play at 1920x1200, everything maximized, perhaps even 16XAA while maintaining a minimum FPS around 60? Or bumping it to 2560x1600 with measly 4XAA?
It is super-expensive but it's actually a pretty good deal considering the knockout performance. If you have a 24"-30" LCD, it is simply amazing. And it's targeted exactly at those people.
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
because they can?
theres alot of smart people here with good jobs, if they got the disposable income and their hobby is computers then why not spend what they worked hard for on the latest equipment?
alot of people dont buy things because they need them, they buy because they want them.
i have the desire to own a 8800GTX and if i actually owned a computer and had the money i wouldnt hesitate. i dont need a 8800, i could probably get away with a x1950pro, but want > need
Originally posted by: Sunrise089
Right now a 8800GTX is $650. The card is awesome. It plays any game at any resolution. It also seems totally unnecessary.
Today, a X1900XT costs $320. There is a $330 difference in price between the cards. So what game are people needing to play that really need $330 more graphical power?
"But Sunrise089, you're being an idiot, G80 will dominate down the road"
Yes it will, it will also drop in price greatly. When R600 launches, which is BEFORE the vast majority of promising upcoming games in the Crysis vein will emerge, the 8800GTX will probably be under $500. For that depreciation to make owning the card worthwile, either a X1900XT will only be worth $170 in 4 months, or there are lots of games available now that the ATI card cannot play. Where are those games? Nothing promanant has launced recently, and plenty of people have been playing Oblivion (the most demanding title available now) extensively with lesser hardware than G80. So what is it really allowing you to do, other than play the same F.E.A.R. and Half Life 2 you've been playing fine already?
I bring this thread up because when 6800 Ultra and X800XT launched we had games coming out like Doom 3 that were NOT playable at desirable resolution on the older hardware, AND were still not fully playable on the new hardware. You were left happy with your 6800GT performance, but not able to destroy the game. I can see no such software lead with G80, infact I see a huge lead in hardware performance. It makes me happy actually, since I have no budget for a new card right now, because I'm not missing out on anything so much as I can tell. Am I missing something here?
Originally posted by: the Chase
Originally posted by: munky
I have an x1900xt, and I would upgrade if I had a high res monitor. But I game on a CRT at 1280x960, and I'm not switching to any LCD. So, I have the luxury of playing at all out settings, like HDR+AA+AAA+HQAF, and I'll most likely only upgrade once DX10 games make it worthwhile. But to run those settings at 1600x1200 or higher with playable fps, you'd need the g80 right now, even for DX9 games. That's why some ppl are upgrading now.
Hey happy birthday munky!
Same thing here with my 1800XT. Going to 1600x1200 really limits the eye candy I can use and I'm getting tired of the slowdowns in Bf2 esp. at that resolution.
Haven't gone for the G80 quite yet though. Can't make myself spend $650 for a video card and the GTS is a great card but far off from the GTX. Hoping prices will drop and an in between GT model will come in at below $500 with closer specs. to the GTX. (And keeping the ear to the ground on the R600).
Crysis is DX9 also......Originally posted by: flexy
But sooner or later there WILL be games which run only w/ DX10, AFAIk Crysis will be one of them, POSSIBLE ut2k7 and other high-end titles.
Look more a few months more down the road, pls![]()
