• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sequential Read or Burst or Seek Time performance for system/boot drive?

Yoorah

Junior Member
Hello,

My PC now has two hard drives, with the following performance measured in HD Tach, and I'm wondering which drive I should use for installing Windows 7 on:

Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 250GB
--------------------------------------------
Average sequential read: 57.7 MB/s
Random access: 12.9 ms
Burst: 254.3 MB/s
CPU load: 0%

WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA3..running in SATA2 mode
--------------------------------------------
Average sequential read: 112.6 MB/s
Random access: 13.1 ms
Burst: 233.6 MB/s ...also, why is this lower than the Seagate? 🙁
CPU load: 4%

I assumed the WD drive would blow the Seagate out of the water, and it does for sequential read, but would this benefit performance as the OS drive, or would the Seagate be better with its higher burst speed and slightly lower random access time?

Thanks!
 
Back
Top