Sequence of ATI cards incl. Mobility?

TheJTrain

Senior member
Dec 3, 2001
665
6
81
I'm fairly well-versed in the nVidia line, having pretty much stuck with them from the GF3 line through the 4, 6, and 7 series, and now a GTX 260.

I know absolutely nothing about how the ATI line stacks up to each other, what's newer, what's more powerful, what looks powerful (according to the number/series) but is gimped (according to the suffix), etc. Can anyone point me to a resource that will show me some kind of progression of the various lines, and includes the Mobility lines? The charts at Tom's Hardware were the first place I looked, but there weren't any Mobility cards included, so it was of little use to my particular situation.

The Witcher's recommended is a X1900 Pro, and my work laptop (shhh) has a Mobility Radeon HD 3400 (256MB RAM), and I have no idea where those two cards are in relation to each other, and therefore if my laptop will run the game well.

Thanks,
JT
 

cusideabelincoln

Diamond Member
Aug 3, 2008
3,275
46
91
The X1900 Pro destroys the HD3400. It's not really a contest.

Here's a link comparing mobile GPUs to each other

The desktop X1900 Pro would be a class 1 card or at least a high-up class 2 card on their rankings.

Just note that you can't compare the names of mobile GPUs to the names of desktop GPUs. Mobile ones are usually clocked lower or gimped than desktop ones. For example on Nvidia's side, a desktop 9800GT has 112 SPs and is clocked at 650/1625/2000 while the mobile 9800M GT has 96 SPs and is clocked at 500/1250/1600.

You can also use GPUreview.com to compare specifications and theoretical performance.
 

Stumps

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
7,125
0
0
from my experience with desktop x19x0 series cards and 3450's I can pretty much say that the x19x0 series cards are miles faster....at least 4x faster.

A 3450 is comparable in performance to the old 9000 series ATI cards (I think X1050 or x1300).

Even in hybrid crossfire on my GF's PC (X2 3800+@2.5GHz, GA-MA78GM-SH2, GV-RX345256-H)the 3200 and 3450 crossfire doesn't even come close to the old 9700 series cards.
 

Tempered81

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2007
6,374
1
81
GTX 295
HD 4870 X2
GTX 280, GTX 285 HD 4850 X2
9800 GX2, GTX 260, GTX 275 HD 4870, HD 4890
8800 GTX, 8800 Ultra, 9800 GTX, 9800 GTX+,
GTS 250 HD 3870 X2, HD 4850
8800 GT 512 MB, 8800 GTS 512 MB, 9800 GT HD 4830
8800 GTS 640 MB, 9600 GT HD 2900 XT, HD 3870
8800 GS, 9600 GSO HD 3850 512 MB, Mobility 3870, HD 4670
8800 GT 256 MB, 8800 GTS 320 MB, GO 8800M HD 2900 PRO, HD 3850 256 MB, Mobility 3850
7950 GX2 X1950 XTX, HD 4650 (DDR3)
7800 GTX 512, 7900 GTO, 7900 GTX X1900 XT, X1950 XT, X1900 XTX
7800 GTX, 7900 GT, 7950 GT X1800 XT, X1900 AIW, X1900 GT, X1950 PRO, HD 2900 GT
7800 GT, 7900 GS, Go 7950 GTX, 8600 GTS, 9500 GT (GDDR3) X1800 XL, X1950 GT, Mobility X1800 XT, HD 4650 (DDR2)
6800 Ultra, 7600 GT, 7800 GS, Go 7800 GTX, Go 7900 GTX, 8600 GT (GDDR3), 9500 GT (DDR2) X800 XT (& PE), X850 XT (& PE), X1650 XT, X1800 GTO, Mobility X1900, HD 2600 XT, HD 3650 (DDR3), HD 3670, Mobility 3670
6800 GT, 6800 GS (PCIe), Go 7800, Go 7900 GS, 8600 GT (DDR2) X800 XL, X800 GTO2/GTO16, Mobility X800 XT, HD 2600 PRO, Mobility HD 2600 XT, HD 3650 (DDR2), Mobility 3650
6800 GS (AGP), Go 6800 Ultra, Go 7600 GT, 8600M GT, 8700M GT X800 GTO 256 MB, X800 PRO, X850 PRO, X1650 GT, Mobility HD 2600
6800, Go 6800, 7300 GT GDDR3, 7600 GS, Go 7700, 8600M GS X800, X800 GTO 128 MB, X1600 XT, X1650 PRO, Mobility X1800
6600 GT, 6800LE, 6800 XT, 7300 GT (DDR2), Go 7600 (128-bit), 8500 GT, 9400 GT 9800 XT, X700 PRO, X800 GT, X800 SE, Mobility X800, X1300 XT, X1600 PRO, HD 2400 XT, HD 3300, Mobility 3470, HD 4350, HD 4550
FX 5900, FX 5900 Ultra, FX 5950 Ultra, 6600 (128-bit), Go 6800 (128-bit) 9700, 9700 PRO, 9800, 9800 PRO, X700, X1300 PRO, Mobility X1450, X1550, Mobility X1600, Mobility X1700, HD 2400 PRO, Mobility HD 2400 XT, Mobility X2500, HD 3200, Mobility 3450
FX 5800 Ultra, FX 5900 XT, Go 6600, Go 7600 (64-bit) 9500 PRO, 9600 XT, Mobility 9800, 9800 PRO (128-bit), X600 XT, Mobility X700, X1050 (128-bit), Mobility X1350, Mobility X1400, Mobility X2300, Mobility HD 2400
4 Ti 4600, 4 Ti 4800, FX 5700 Ultra, 6200, 8400 GS 9600 PRO, Mobility 9700 (128-bit), 9800 LE, X600 PRO, Mobility X600, Mobility X1300, Xpress 1250, Mobility HD 2300
4 Ti4200, 4 Ti4400, 4 Ti4800 SE, FX 5600 Ultra, FX 5700, 6600 (64-bit), 7300 GS, 8400M GS, 9300M G, 9300M GS 9500, 9550, 9600, Mobility 9600, X300, X1050 (64-bit)
3 Ti500, FX 5200 Ultra, FX 5600, FX 5700 LE, Go 5700, 6200 TC, 6600 LE, 7200 GS, 7300 LE, 8200M, 9200M GS, 9100M 8500, 9100, 9000 PRO, 9600 LE, Mobility 9700 (64-bit), X300 SE, X1150
3, 3 Ti200, FX 5200 (128-bit), FX 5500, Go 5600, Go 6200, Go 6400, Go 7200, Go 7300, Go 7400 (64-bit) 9000, 9200, 9250, Mobility 9600 (64-bit), Mobility X300
FX 5200 (64 bit), 6100, 6150, Go 7200, Go 7400 (32-bit) 9200 SE, Xpress 200M, Xpress 1000, Xpress 1150
2 GTS, 4 MX 440, 2 Ultra, 2 Ti, 2 Ti 200 7500
256, 2 MX 200, 4 MX 420, 2 MX 400 SDR, LE, DDR, 7000, 7200
Nvidia TNT Rage 128


http://www.tomshardware.com/re...eforce-gtx,2270-6.html
 
Apr 20, 2008
10,067
990
126
The 3450 series was right on par with my old x1650 (non pro) when it was released. This angered me and i picked up an 8800GTS 320mb soon there after.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Originally posted by: Scholzpdx
The 3450 series was right on par with my old x1650 (non pro) when it was released. This angered me and i picked up an 8800GTS 320mb soon there after.

This post is funny. You bought a card targeted at the lowest end of the market and were disappointed that it didn't offer the same performance as a high middle end card that costs 5x as much?
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Originally posted by: TheJTrain


The Witcher's recommended is a X1900 Pro, and my work laptop (shhh) has a Mobility Radeon HD 3400 (256MB RAM), and I have no idea where those two cards are in relation to each other, and therefore if my laptop will run the game well.

Thanks,
JT

There's no question that an X1900 will best a 3450, none at all. Having said that, one my my test bed systems has a Radeon 4350 in it. The 4350 is similar to the 3450, though it has double the stream processors and higher clocks, which seemed to handle The Witcher perfectly fine at 1024x768 with all max settings, minus AA.

I bet you could get the Witcher to run on your 3450 if you ran at a low res and tweaked the settings a little.
 
Apr 20, 2008
10,067
990
126
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Originally posted by: Scholzpdx
The 3450 series was right on par with my old x1650 (non pro) when it was released. This angered me and i picked up an 8800GTS 320mb soon there after.

This post is funny. You bought a card targeted at the lowest end of the market and were disappointed that it didn't offer the same performance as a high middle end card that costs 5x as much?

Umm it was more like a picked up the card that was the budget mid-range (x1650) that after a couple years the true budget GPU (3450) became faster. I picked up a brand new $79 8800GTS 320mb and that was that.
 

TheJTrain

Senior member
Dec 3, 2001
665
6
81
Wow, thanks for all the info fellas - I knew there had to be some ATI stalwarts around who knew exactly what I was after. Thanks also to jaredpace for that great (and timely even, only a couple of weeks ok) hierarchy link @ Tom's! Looks like I probably won't try to run The Witcher on my laptop.