September 11: Unanswered questions

[kylebisme]

They believe it only because they want to

I believe a corporate conspiracy is the most likely explanation because it reconciles best with the evidence I've seen. On the other hand, you falsers are intent on believing the buildings came down by impact damage and fires alone, despite the utter lack of any evidence that such things are even close to physically possible.

 

[al981]

They believe it only because they want to

or because certain elements in the united states government have continually covered up the deaths of many americans in the past.

when finally forced to release the surveillance footage in question that would identify the additional killers, all the surveillance footage are edited and blanked out due to <insert bullshit excuse here>.

edit: oh yeah, see sig.

 

[Doboji]

It's also a question for which there is not enough evidence publicly available to rightly answer either way.


Sure, and neither to falsers, but as for what is going on in this forum, you're dodging the arguments of truthers here by dragging in ones from elsewhere to refute instead.

Holy shit you are a sheisty skeevy bastard arent you. Using the semantics of the english words "true" and "false", to make your argument while claiming not to be making an argument at all. Youre just so amazingly clever.... But seriously why do you bother your super sneaky clever subliminal arguing techniques? Dont you realize we all think youre a complete knucklehead, and dont give a monkeys ass about what you have to say?

 

[SandEagle]

Rumsfeld held a press conference on Sept. 10, 2001 to disclose that 2+ trillion dollars were unaccounted for.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU4GdHLUHwU


2.6 trillion dollars unaccounted for while under the watch of the undersecretary of Defense and Comptroller, a US/Israeli dual citizen ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dov_Zakheim)

gee, i wonder what happened next to get everyones attention away from the missing money? i wonder where that money went :\

 

[dmcowen674]

I have a few unanswered 9/11 questions. Perhaps some people here can provide insight.

1. On 9/11/2001, at around 8:15AM I was at the Staples on Fulton Street and Water Street, a block away from the South Street Seaport, to purchase some things. When the first plane struck I saw people were running towards the burning tower to take pictures.

When the second plane struck, the whole building shook and a Staples salesperson, who was on a ladder getting a printer, fell hard to the ground. That's when I saw people running away from the burning towers. It was now obvious that this was no accident.

So you were there.

Do you believe it was not planes that hit the buildings then and believe the demolition nuts?

 

[Vette73]

Rumsfeld held a press conference on Sept. 10, 2001 to disclose that 2+ trillion dollars were unaccounted for.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU4GdHLUHwU


2.6 trillion dollars unaccounted for while under the watch of the undersecretary of Defense and Comptroller, a US/Israeli dual citizen ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dov_Zakheim)

gee, i wonder what happened next to get everyones attention away from the missing money? i wonder where that money went :\

Did you even read your own link?

reduction of that sum by two-thirds by the time of his departure. It has now been reduced by more than 90 per cent. [3]

Your tinfoil hat is on to tight.

 

[kylebisme]

Skimming the alleged source of that claim, it seems to lack anything to actually support it.

 

[Narmer]

So you were there.

Do you believe it was not planes that hit the buildings then and believe the demolition nuts?

I ran to the police station and watched both towers fall. I'm not sure if your question was meant to be facetous but I could not see anything peculiar from that distance. However, I was amazed how orderly the buildings came down. I expected them to tip over but modern engineering has fixed that. By the time WTC 7 fell I was home.

 

[kylebisme]

I expected them to tip over but modern engineering has fixed that.

Rather, a lot of explosives fixed that, not that they would have even tipped much of any were it only for the jet impacts and fires.

 

[EagleKeeper]

Rather, a lot of explosives fixed that, not that they would have even tipped much of any were it only for the jet impacts and fires.

Yet there has never been any evidence of explosives being used

 

[LunarRay]

Yet there has never been any evidence of explosives being used

IF they found unreacted RDX in the dust would you call that evidence of explosives being used? Well, assuming the 'investigations' were tasked to look for explosives in the first place.

 

[xj0hnx]

Rather, a lot of explosives fixed that, not that they would have even tipped much of any were it only for the jet impacts and fires.

I guess you could classify two jets as an explosive in this scenario.

Yet there has never been any evidence of explosives being used

Nope, sure hasn't, well there is that one video that they ran through some filters that if you turn your headphones up real loud you can make out what sound like a building collaps, er ...I mean an explosion.

IF they found unreacted RDX in the dust would you call that evidence of explosives being used? Well, assuming the 'investigations' were tasked to look for explosives in the first place.

Did they find any RDX? C4? det cord? shock tube? pieces of linear shape charges? any residue from explosives? :thumbsup:

 

[dmcowen674]

I ran to the police station and watched both towers fall. I'm not sure if your question was meant to be facetous but I could not see anything peculiar from that distance. However, I was amazed how orderly the buildings came down. I expected them to tip over but modern engineering has fixed that. By the time WTC 7 fell I was home.

The north tower did come down at an angle, that how the staircase in the middle survived.

Besides 110 floors of concrete tends to follow gravity pretty much.

 

[EagleKeeper]

Yet there has never been any evidence of explosives being used

IF they found unreacted RDX in the dust would you call that evidence of explosives being used? Well, assuming the 'investigations' were tasked to look for explosives in the first place.

Explosives leave evidence of the supporting materials.

It also takes time to prep a building to do so.
Nothing has been produced that indicates either.

 

[LunarRay]

Did they find any RDX? C4? det cord? shock tube? pieces of linear shape charges? any residue from explosives? :thumbsup:

I don't think so. Not sure they even found evidence of all the dead folks said to have been killed on 9/11 either...

But my question was to do with what constitutes evidence of explosives... AND, if unreacted RDX was found would that constitute evidence in CC's thinking... I can't very well move on to the next bit 'till I've ascertained common understanding.

 

[LunarRay]

(...)
Besides 110 floors of concrete tends to follow gravity pretty much.

How about the metal 3 ton bits that found their way over 100 meters from the towers embedded in the sides of other buildings... did that also proceed according to gravity alone? Maybe just some elastic/plastic transfer of energy?
Soon, we're going to run out of energy to accomplish all that did occur... based on the potential energy of that bit above the undamage portion of those towers.

 

[LunarRay]

Explosives leave evidence of the supporting materials.

It also takes time to prep a building to do so.
Nothing has been produced that indicates either.

But, I'm trying to start somewhere. IF Unreacted RDX or Dynamite or C4 or Thermite in some configuration is found in the dust is that not something to wonder about... all other things being equal?

The time to prep a building falls into the catagory of... hehehehe, When you eliminate the impossible what is left contains the answer no matter how improbable...