• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sept 11th. thoughts

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: sward666
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: sward666
If you think that's a solid argument, you're a dipshit.

why?
Well, just for example here, you seem to take this other dipshit's word for it that no wreckage or luggage was found at the Pentagon, when there was plenty of both, and there were plenty of eyewitnesses that saw that plane hit the building.


im not doubting a plane hit it, what i am questioning is what plane hit it. Also there is a gas station that had a security camera pointed right at the impact site when it happend. the Government took the tape and it has dissapeared into a blackhole. It would be very interesting to view that tape.
 
bigfoot was aboard evil's ufo smoking pot with tupac and jim morrison on the way to the grassy knoll. I think the bulge was biggie smalls.
 
Originally posted by: Citrix
First off... I am not a conspirist theorist.

A friend sent me the link below for me to check out. I did and after reading and seeing the video/photo/eye witness evidence i must say he has a solid arguement. Check it out for yourselves.

Video from many camera of the bulge under the plane and mysterious flash just before impact.

Link to Cleveland 9News story that Flight 93 landed at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.

Pictures of the Pentagon. Why is it that no wreckage of the plane was never found? or luggage?

You find lots of wreckage when a plane crashes while trying to land/takeoff, etc. When it augers in at high speed/angle, there isn't much left to find. The pictures of the Flight 93 site don't show any recognizable debris either IIRC, and this is consistent with photos I've seen of a 737 that went in head first outside of Colorado Springs a few years back.

Also Why did a FOX News employee, who witnessed the second tower attack, report seeing no windows and having a circular blue logo near the front door on ?Flight 175? a commercial United Airlines jetliner?

In general, conspiracy theories like this require far to many people to be complicit with the deception, most of whom have no incentive to be.
 
I suppose this is why Bush didn't act surprised when he got word of this happening while he was still in that class right ? :roll:

I don't particularly like Dubya, but the gov't having something to do with this is ludicrous. I wish there were a word beyond ludicrous.
 
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: sward666
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: sward666
If you think that's a solid argument, you're a dipshit.

why?
Well, just for example here, you seem to take this other dipshit's word for it that no wreckage or luggage was found at the Pentagon, when there was plenty of both, and there were plenty of eyewitnesses that saw that plane hit the building.


im not doubting a plane hit it, what i am questioning is what plane hit it. Also there is a gas station that had a security camera pointed right at the impact site when it happend. the Government took the tape and it has dissapeared into a blackhole. It would be very interesting to view that tape.

I doubt it would be very interesting at all.
 
Originally posted by: Bishop
The American government was behind 9/11 to rally support so Bush could start a war against Iraq. The moon landing was also faked, and Kennedy was killed by a magic bullet. Oh, and lima beans taste good.

okay. i belive 911, i don't belive the moon landing, and no there is no magic bullet and lima beans are okay. and i would probaly change my mind about 911 IF the links worked

edit okay i saw tux daves site and i don't belive 911 anymoer. not that i really did before
 
Originally posted by: Citrix
im not doubting a plane hit it, what i am questioning is what plane hit it. Also there is a gas station that had a security camera pointed right at the impact site when it happend. the Government took the tape and it has dissapeared into a blackhole. It would be very interesting to view that tape.
The problem is people (conspiracy theorists) can say this stuff all day and it doesn't make it any more true. Where's proof that there was a tape pointed there in the first place ? Where's proof that it was even turned on ? Where's this gas station exactly ?
 
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: Citrix
im not doubting a plane hit it, what i am questioning is what plane hit it. Also there is a gas station that had a security camera pointed right at the impact site when it happend. the Government took the tape and it has dissapeared into a blackhole. It would be very interesting to view that tape.
The problem is people (conspiracy theorists) can say this stuff all day and it doesn't make it any more true. Where's proof that there was a tape pointed there in the first place ? Where's proof that it was even turned on ? Where's this gas station exactly ?

and y would a gas station security camera be pointed at the sky in the case of the WTC and i dont think there are any buildings that close to the pentagon that a security camera would pick up the crash there
 
I don't like Bush, but there isn't a current or former US administration so malicious, so evil that it would murder thousands of people to further its agenda, hidden, or otherwise.

Didn't happen.
 
links dont work...? its a conspiracy!!!!

edit: they dont work one minute, and then the next its fine. proof its a conspiracy.
 
Back
Top