Clarence Thomas didn't have a tax problem. This misunderstanding continues to be spread. It was some kind of disclosue form, nothing at all tax related.
---------------------
As a tax professional who does personal property tax returns (as well as others) I can understand how this error easily occurred.
Firstly, I highly doubt McCaskill prepares such tax returns.
IIRC, the plane was orginally outside the county and thus wasn't taxable there. Later the plane was moved to the county.
Now the accountant preparing the form normally just looks for new asset acquired and older assets disposed of to comlete the form. (Note that your personal property tax form comes pre-completed with all assets previously reported to the country, you're supposed to add the new ones and show which old ones must be stricken off.)
The accountant likely would be using the financial statements to make changes, they likely wouldn't know the plane had been moved. If I were McCaskill, I'd have the accountant check the prop tax form for the other county and make sure the plane was removed from it so they don't pay prop taxes twice. I'm thinking it's still listed as being at the old location.
When you also consider that the company owning the plane was registered in Delaware, it's gets even easier to make a mistake. They likely weren't familiar with the other state's (county) rules and wouldn't even be on the mailing list to get the info/forms.
Fern
Good points, but at least part of the reason for incorporating out of state is to save taxes. Purchasing the plane inside Missouri would have cost at least another hundred grand in sales tax. Delaware certainly is business friendly, but it also has no state sales tax in addition to no personal property tax. Also, it was a previous plane that was originally hangered out of state in Illinois (again, no such taxes), not just in another county. I'm sure her intent was to honestly dodge taxes, not to break the law, but that still plays into the typical politician hypocrisy of "Do as I say, not as I do." Little people commit fraud and are "seriously delinquent"; the elite take actions that are "inappropriate" and "regrettable" in retrospect. Little people pay fines and penalties, get sanctioned, go to prison; the elite are "embarrassed", "fail to live up to their own standards", and "disappoint themselves".
You are correct. There are plenty of other reasons rich folk have paperwork out of the ass but the reasons are almost always making/keeping money or protecting money/assets they already have (or might have at some future date).
If this is truly a corporate jet, why is she personally liable for the taxes and not the corporation?
Shell corporation owned by McCaskill and her husband; they ARE the corporation, as it's a limited liability corporation rather than a publicly traded company.
Frankly, the property tax dodge could easily be an oversight and probably was, but it pales next to the original POLITICO investigation. From the original ethics complaint:
http://politicmo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/2011-03-14-Ethics-Complaint-re-McCaskill.pdf
Claire McCaskill's Violations of Senate Rule 37
Senator McCaskill's payment of U.S. taxpayer dollars to her and her husband's own company to fund her own travel aboard her own private aircraft, while apparently drawing personal profits from that company for those very plane "rentals" violates Senate Rule 37.
Senator McCaskill has spent at least $75,990 of taxpayer funds to pay for 89 flights aboard a private corporate plane of Timesaver, LLC ("TS LLC"), a company that she co-owns with her husband.
In 2007, Senator McCaskill reported Timesaver LLC as providing her with income from "rent" of between $50,001 and $100,000.
McCaskill created a shell corporation, bought a plane with it, then charged taxpayers to fund HER travels in HER plane. Thus she not only got free travel, but she also got to make a profit on it, at taxpayer expense. Frankly, it's a LOT worse than I first thought when I read the article. This is the kind of thing that, were the Senate in opposition hands, might even lead to impeachment or even criminal charges. But I doubt it's a whole lot different in principle from what a lot of Senators and Representatives are doing. When you have a LOT of money and a LOT of power, it takes real self control to not think you deserve even more money and power, that rules and laws are for other people. It's like the Tom Delay situation; McCaskill did something that probably a majority are doing, but has done it in a way that is (arguably anyway) illegal, the main difference being that McCaskill was busted by a POLITICO investigation whereas the Hammer blatantly did it openly - arrogance leading to stupidity.
McCaskill herself as quoted in the complaint:
"Nothing that irritates Americans more than the fact that some members of Congress think they are entitled to their own set of rules. And it's true - too many people in Washington live in an alternate reality. It's time for that to stop."
I'll be amazed if McCaskill can win reelection after these revelations. (Of course, I'm also amazed that a ten year old single engine plane can be worth $2.2 million, so YMMV.)