Whatever excuse you need to make I suppose. It'll improve your future election prospects when you properly assign the blame to your candidate instead of outside forces.
I never said Russian interference was the reason Hillary lost. I've said in the past she was an unlikable candidate. You now point out how Warrens numbers are far better then Hillary's at this point in time. Has it occurred to you the Russians have learned things and will do a better job next time putting a likable candidate in peril? Maybe hacking into systems and changing votes along with a more effective disinformation campaign?
I have read over your posts in this thread and find them, in my opinion, to be biased. On the one hand the point is that while foreign attempts to influence our elections can't be prevented, the evidence in the Muller report suggests that the 'Elect Trump Team' cooperated and wanted their help. You deflect away from that fact. Secondly, you attribute Clinton's loss to her poor candidacy while running against Trump, the poorest candidate ever to be elected very likely. In other words, you project onto the election your own feelings about how worthless she was. You can imagine and I am sure you do, that you came to these conclusions via astute political analysis, but what I see in you is a disgruntled personality contemptuous of liberal thinking. It is the tint in your lenses that causes you to see things as you do, not their reality. You came into this with a point of view already in place. Do you have curmudgeon-like tendencies?
You didn't seen to notice I didn't blame the Russians for Hillary losing but you cannot claim it was a non factor.
