Originally posted by: halik
where are you guys pulling these numbers from ? I can't find anyone claiming anything other than too close to call
cnn.com
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/MT/S/01/index.html
Originally posted by: halik
where are you guys pulling these numbers from ? I can't find anyone claiming anything other than too close to call
Originally posted by: Jadow
Yes, be happy for Webb, now he can put as many little boy's penises in his mouth as he likes.
Originally posted by: HigherGround
Originally posted by: Jadow
Yes, be happy for Webb, now he can put as many little boy's penises in his mouth as he likes.
WTF?!?
Originally posted by: Lothar
Jon Tester (DEM) 194,914 49%
Conrad Burns (REP)* 193,179 49%
99% of precincts reporting
How much population does Meager County have? They are the only one left to report.
Conrad Burns (REP)* 0 0%
Jon Tester (DEM) 0 0%
0% of precincts reporting
Originally posted by: Lothar
Jon Tester (DEM) 194,914 49%
Conrad Burns (REP)* 193,179 49%
99% of precincts reporting
How much population does Meager County have? They are the only one left to report.
Conrad Burns (REP)* 0 0%
Jon Tester (DEM) 0 0%
0% of precincts reporting
Originally posted by: HigherGround
Originally posted by: Jadow
Yes, be happy for Webb, now he can put as many little boy's penises in his mouth as he likes.
WTF?!?
It'd be interesting to find out how many people are registered to vote there.Originally posted by: Rainsford
According to Wikipedia, the entire population of the county (it's Meagher, btw) is 1,932. So if EVERYONE in the county voted and EVERYONE in the county voted for Burns, he'd win by a hundred votes or so. In other words, Tester has basically won...barring a recount and absentee ballots of course.
Originally posted by: Ken_g6
This is gonna be close. Burns is now down by less than 2000. With only one county not listed (on CNN.com), it looks like someone will edge out a Meagher victory.
Edit: Dasm, didn't see the second page.![]()
Originally posted by: Jadow
Yes, be happy for Webb, now he can put as many little boy's penises in his mouth as he likes.
----------------------------------------------------------
Unless you can back this up - you will be gone for a month.
You have 24 hours to anti up the evidence.
Anandtech Moderator
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Jadow
Yes, be happy for Webb, now he can put as many little boy's penises in his mouth as he likes.
----------------------------------------------------------
Unless you can back this up - you will be gone for a month.
You have 24 hours to anti up the evidence.
Anandtech Moderator
Thank You Mods, that is disgusting.
Originally posted by: jrenz
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Jadow
Yes, be happy for Webb, now he can put as many little boy's penises in his mouth as he likes.
----------------------------------------------------------
Unless you can back this up - you will be gone for a month.
You have 24 hours to anti up the evidence.
Anandtech Moderator
Thank You Mods, that is disgusting.
You should be thanking them for not banning you based on the number of lies you tell around here, Dave.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: jrenz
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Jadow
Yes, be happy for Webb, now he can put as many little boy's penises in his mouth as he likes.
----------------------------------------------------------
Unless you can back this up - you will be gone for a month.
You have 24 hours to anti up the evidence.
Anandtech Moderator
Thank You Mods, that is disgusting.
You should be thanking them for not banning you based on the number of lies you tell around here, Dave.
Lies to Republicans, Opinion to Americans.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Jadow
Yes, be happy for Webb, now he can put as many little boy's penises in his mouth as he likes.
----------------------------------------------------------
Unless you can back this up - you will be gone for a month.
You have 24 hours to anti up the evidence.
Anandtech Moderator
Thank You Mods, that is disgusting.
Originally posted by: Jadow
Yes, be happy for Webb, now he can put as many little boy's penises in his mouth as he likes.
Any updates? It looks like there won't be a recount either, there has to be <.25% difference of total votes, not sure if that means it would include the Lib votes as well. With Lib vote, it's around .85% and without it's .40%. I think the Dem's will pull off the upset.Originally posted by: senseamp
About 950 people voted in Meagher in 2004. 700 for Bush, 250 for Kerry. And Burns isn't nearly as popular as Bush was in MT in 2004.
So stick a fork in this one, it's done.
Yeah, just because he wrote an article in 1979 on why he thought women shouldn't be in the military, all of a sudden he's "sexist". roflOriginally posted by: rockyct
Yeah, Jadow's comment was over the line. I first thought he was being extremely sarcastic as there was an Allen ad taking passages out of Webb's books and using them against him. However, when I see a previous quote by Jadow, it actual looks like his skewed view is serious:
"Allen is a piece of crap, but so is Webb, in that race, like most races, you're choosing between a nutty piece of crap, and a corn filled one.
Allen is a racist.
Webb is a sexist AND he wrote about a father putting his son's penis in his mouth. No matter what the circumstances, that is wierd. "
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Any updates? It looks like there won't be a recount either, there has to be <.25% difference of total votes, not sure if that means it would include the Lib votes as well. With Lib vote, it's around .85% and without it's .40%. I think the Dem's will pull off the upset.Originally posted by: senseamp
About 950 people voted in Meagher in 2004. 700 for Bush, 250 for Kerry. And Burns isn't nearly as popular as Bush was in MT in 2004.
So stick a fork in this one, it's done.
