Karl Agathon
Golden Member
- Sep 30, 2010
- 1,081
- 0
- 0
Vote for her if she runs.
At this point, I would definitely consider it. Although she seems to be just a one trick pony.
Vote for her if she runs.
Palestinian rocket launcher-
![]()
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/weapons/q0279.shtml
Fire it off from anywhere, run like Hell, watch the Israelis blow up the neighborhood. According to some, the Israelis are perfectly justified.
And hopefully she'll keep your brown slaves working the fields for pennies, amirite?
Populists don't win the Presidency in this country (at least not in the last almost 2 centuries) so go ahead and vote for the female version of William Jennings Bryant since she's a guaranteed losing candidate.
You have a vivid fantasy.
You're the one that's always happy that Mexicans are working for nothing so you can get a cheap head of lettuce.
Don't blame me, it's your opinion.
Voluntarily. Brown slaves must be your kinky sex fantasy that I am not interested in hearing.
Oh, so they're just free market vegetable pickers? Carry on then.
![]()
From the same article, also palestinian rocket launchers. Not common, but becoming increasingly numeric and a big reason they're trying to stop the proliferation of arms.
I think she's wrong on this one, but she's still much better than Hillary would be.
"But when Hamas puts its rocket launchers next to hospitals, next to schools, they're using their civilian population to protect their military assets. And I believe Israel has a right, at that point, to defend itself," she said.
I fail to see the problem.
regardless.....Israel has a right to defend her people from the aggression of Hamas.....Bullshit. The article states that those are soviet launchers from WW2.
regardless.....Israel has a right to defend her people from the aggression of Hamas.....
If Hamas truly cared about the Palestinian infrastructure they would have invested in it, Instead the invested in tunnels and munitions and missiles.
It is kind of hard to eat 3 square meals of missles and minition...
As usual you have no idea why their were embargos....And Gazans have the right to defend themselves against relentless embargo by Israel along with artillery, munitions from fighter bombers & hellfire missile attacks from helicopters, too. They fight back with whatever they can come up with rather than the vastly greater firepower of the Israelis' American made military.
Bullshit. The article states that those are soviet launchers from WW2.
regardless.....Israel has a right to defend her people from the aggression of Hamas.....
If Hamas truly cared about the Palestinian infrastructure they would have invested in it, Instead the invested in tunnels and munitions and missiles.
It is kind of hard to eat 3 square meals of missles and minition...
Bullshit. The article states that those are soviet launchers from WW2.
Because it's impossible to acquire old mass produced arms from the soviet union?
And Gazans have the right to defend themselves against relentless embargo by Israel along with artillery, munitions from fighter bombers & hellfire missile attacks from helicopters, too. They fight back with whatever they can come up with rather than the vastly greater firepower of the Israelis' American made military.
If you have a time machine, yes , it is possible to get this gear, undoubtly...
Because it's impossible to acquire old mass produced arms from the soviet union?
Because you propagandize in an effort to justify Israel. Such launchers have not been shown to exist in Gaza, despite your claims that they do, or that they might, or that they could.
Gazan rocket attacks are remarkably ineffective at causing death & destruction in Israel. Modern artillery has much greater range & accuracy, but they don't have even that.
