Of course you don't see a good reason, it doesn't affect you and that is all you will ever care about.
Any proud and functional nation takes care of it's own citisens. That USED to be something the US adhered to.
What? When did the US care about all of its citizens? We have always had a marginalized population at just about every point in our history. Things are probably better now for everybody than they ever were. Of course we are still extremely flawed.
A big problem with your type of thinking is that you think the reason why someone might disagree is b/c all they care about is themselves. My guess is that Fern and others may be against this type of measure is b/c they are afraid of how it might hurt the country in the long run. I myself think that some people really need this unemployment money. So much better going to our citizens than going to the damned banks. However, I also think that the objections of others may be well-founded. It is a risk I am willing to take, though.
Now the real horrible person here is the person this thread is about. I find this comment incredibly revealing (obviously this is why it was in the article):
"And at one point during the debate, which dragged on till nearly midnight, Bunning complained of missing a basketball game.
'I have missed the Kentucky-South Carolina game that started at 9:00," he said,
"and it's the only redeeming chance we had to beat South Carolina since they're the only team that has beat Kentucky this year.'"
Amazing.