• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Self Build Gaming Machine

Treebeard1

Junior Member
I am hoping to self build my next PC and would be grateful for some advice. I currently run a P3 800 with 256 ram, 40mb HDD and a Radeon 7200. This is now showing its age and XP is certainly testing it.

I want the new machine to be primarily fast for gaming although I will need to do some work on digital pictures on it with Photoshop.

I am looking at upgrading the CPU to a P4 3.00, also the PSU, case, mobo, ram to 1gb and graphics card. I want to fit a new 40mb HDD and probably will keep the old one to use as a slave, as it is only a few months old. I?ll also keep the DVD Rom and CD writer from the old machine with a view to updating these at some point in the future.

I like the look of the Geforce 6800 but not sure my budget will run to this immediately but I would like to have the option to upgrade to it later. I understand it will need a pretty big PSU for it to operate. It might be that I could buy a cheaper card now and upgrade to the 6800 at some date in the future, I?m not sure. I have a budget of about 500 ukp excluding the video card.

Any advice on the components I need would be gratefully received.
 
With an ATI Radeon X800 Pro ($400 USD) you can probably use the stock 380w power supply in the great Antec Sonata case.

Also, for gaming an A64 3000+ is a better deal since it's as fast as a P4 3.2. I say this despite owning a P4 3.2C myself (, Sonata, Asus P4C800E, 1 GB, nV 5900nu, audigy 2zs, samsung 120 & 160.)
 
Actually, for gaming an Athlon64 3000 is a little faster than a 3.2 P4, but point made. I would go that route. As for the video, I won't spend $500 for the extra performance, get a 9800 pro.

And what is 500 ukp in us $ approx ??
 
get an athlon 64 of some sort and use the money saved for better stuff in other areas. no reason to waste money on intel for games esp.
 
Originally posted by: Markfw900
Actually, for gaming an Athlon64 3000 is a little faster than a 3.2 P4, but point made. I would go that route. As for the video, I won't spend $500 for the extra performance, get a 9800 pro.

And what is 500 ukp in us $ approx ??

I agree on the vid card and CPU recommendations. An 9800 pro would be a nice budget saver in my opinion. If it were me though id go with a athlon 3200 or 3400.
 
Originally posted by: jdiddy
wow how time flies were starting to talk about a 9800 pro as a budget card yikes.

Yeah... When I bought my 9800 pro two weeks ago it was considered a top of the line gaming card... Now it's a buget card. I'm starting to feel the whole thing about your computer being outdated in two weeks really IS true.
 
what's the deal with the 9600. I have an ALL-IN-WONDER 9600 and love it. However nobody ever seems to mention or recommend it.... why is that?
 
btw - 9800 is a great card... but still not a budget card...

it's kinda like saying, "I need a car... but I'm on a budget." and then everyone chimes in with, "Mercedes..... BMW..... Corvette!"

maybe the price has come down everywhere except near me though? The prices everywhere I look are still $249-$299 and up. Or maybe I'm thinking of the XT.
 
Originally posted by: Markfw900
Actually, for gaming an Athlon64 3000 is a little faster than a 3.2 P4, but point made. I would go that route. As for the video, I won't spend $500 for the extra performance, get a 9800 pro.

And what is 500 ukp in us $ approx ??

$896.88 Nice chunk of change for some upgrades.
 
Back
Top