Seeking Better Soundcard

MinisterPhobia

Junior Member
May 9, 2007
2
0
0
I'm looking for a better sound card. I've been a Creative fan for alot of years, and currently have a Soundblaster Audigy 2. It's come time for me to upgrade the card and I'm trying to avoid Creative. Let's face it, Creative's drivers have been spiraling downhill for a long time. So, while an X-Fi would be a cool card to get, I'd like to get something that isn't Creative.

Does anyone have any suggestions on what to look into? I've considered the Razer Barracuda, but, I'm just not sure. I'm hoping that I can get some better suggestions here.
 

Sdiver2489

Senior member
Nov 7, 2003
303
0
0
What speakers will you be using? Is it a home theater system or a set of computer speakers? How much are you willing to spend? How much do you play games?
 

MinisterPhobia

Junior Member
May 9, 2007
2
0
0
I do some gaming, but, I'm mostly looking for a high quality output for the music. I like my music. The gaming I do is mostly RPG where the 5.1 would be wasted. So, simply Stereo output.

I'm currently using a Monsoon Audio speaker setup. Stereo speakers with a sub. Good setup. I really dig it.
 

Sdiver2489

Senior member
Nov 7, 2003
303
0
0
So are they powered via a receiver/amplifier? If so what is it? Secondly what inputs does it have?
 

Ken90630

Golden Member
Mar 6, 2004
1,571
2
81
I recommend the Chaintech AV-710, with the good drivers from ViaArena.com. For 2.1 stereo, and primarily listening to music rather than gaming, it's tough to beat. And it's usually <$30 at ZZF or Newegg. :cool:

It's a solid card that has been around for several years and has an excellent reputation among computer audiophiles.
 

Sdiver2489

Senior member
Nov 7, 2003
303
0
0
Originally posted by: Ken90630
I recommend the Chaintech AV-710, with the good drivers from ViaArena.com. For 2.1 stereo, and primarily listening to music rather than gaming, it's tough to beat. And it's usually <$30 at ZZF or Newegg. :cool:

It's a solid card that has been around for several years and has an excellent reputation among computer audiophiles.

It's actually rather easy to beat. The Chaintech is typically only recommended for digital or stereo(when $30 is max)

The Wolfson modification in software only makes its performance "acceptable"
 

Ken90630

Golden Member
Mar 6, 2004
1,571
2
81
Originally posted by: Sdiver2489
Originally posted by: Ken90630
I recommend the Chaintech AV-710, with the good drivers from ViaArena.com. For 2.1 stereo, and primarily listening to music rather than gaming, it's tough to beat. And it's usually <$30 at ZZF or Newegg. :cool:

It's a solid card that has been around for several years and has an excellent reputation among computer audiophiles.

It's actually rather easy to beat. The Chaintech is typically only recommended for digital or stereo(when $30 is max)

The Wolfson modification in software only makes its performance "acceptable"

Well, we could both prolly waste an evening debating what constitutes "acceptable" or "tough to beat," but I'll guess we both have better things to do (I know I do). :p

The crowd over at AVS (which generally has far more credibility when it comes to audio matters than this site's gamer-centric crowd) has spoken highly of the AV-710 for quite some time, and I don't recall any consensus that it's merely "acceptable." Compared to Creative's extremely mediocre (and gaming-oriented) Audigys and similar fare, the AV-710 would be a huge step up IMHO.

For simple stereo music listening -- which is what the OP said he's going to use it for -- I don't know of many cards that beat the AV-710 for accurate music reproduction thru computer speakers. There may be some (the Oxygen, for example?), but at significantly higher cost. And I'm sure there are cards with more features and/or bells & whistles, but I was opining based on the basic needs the OP says he has and also assuming (rightly or wrongly) that he'd be looking for something that doesn't cost a king's ransom (since he's used a rather inexpensive Audigy until now).

Not looking for an argument here, but what cards do you think will provide better 2.1 stereo music reproduction than the Chaintech, and what makes them better? In your answer, keep in mind the limitations of computer speakers and whether or not on-paper superiority will translate into audible benefit with the OP's setup. No receiver, outboard amp or bookshelf speakers here, remember.
 

Sdiver2489

Senior member
Nov 7, 2003
303
0
0
Originally posted by: Ken90630
Originally posted by: Sdiver2489
Originally posted by: Ken90630
I recommend the Chaintech AV-710, with the good drivers from ViaArena.com. For 2.1 stereo, and primarily listening to music rather than gaming, it's tough to beat. And it's usually <$30 at ZZF or Newegg. :cool:

It's a solid card that has been around for several years and has an excellent reputation among computer audiophiles.

It's actually rather easy to beat. The Chaintech is typically only recommended for digital or stereo(when $30 is max)

The Wolfson modification in software only makes its performance "acceptable"

Well, we could both prolly waste an evening debating what constitutes "acceptable" or "tough to beat," but I'll guess we both have better things to do (I know I do). :p

The crowd over at AVS (which generally has far more credibility when it comes to audio matters than this site's gamer-centric crowd) has spoken highly of the AV-710 for quite some time, and I don't recall any consensus that it's merely "acceptable." Compared to Creative's extremely mediocre (and gaming-oriented) Audigys and similar fare, the AV-710 would be a huge step up IMHO.

For simple stereo music listening -- which is what the OP said he's going to use it for -- I don't know of many cards that beat the AV-710 for accurate music reproduction thru computer speakers. There may be some (the Oxygen, for example?), but at significantly higher cost. And I'm sure there are cards with more features and/or bells & whistles, but I was opining based on the basic needs the OP says he has and also assuming (rightly or wrongly) that he'd be looking for something that doesn't cost a king's ransom (since he used a rather inexpensive Audigy before).

Not looking for an argument here, but what cards do you think will provide better 2.1 stereo music reproduction than the Chaintech, and what makes them better? In your answer, keep in mind the limitations of computer speakers and whether or not on-paper superiority will translate into audible benefit with the OP's setup. No receiver, outboard amp or bookshelf speakers here, remember.

While I agree that the drivers for the chaintech are much better and simpler. The fact is it does fall short in simple things like frequency response. Look up some RMAA tests and you will see that even using the surround outs for stereo(which are better than the fronts) still don't give you a linear frequency response out of the card. The X-fi does beat this and it will trounce it in signal to noise ratio and THD.

Now, the reason many people at AVS like the AV-710(which I did buy from my brothers computer) is because it is a cheap card with a full size digital out. No creative card offers the standard format digital out without an expansion box or bay. When it comes to digital, the quality of the op amps no longer applies, nor the D/A converter. This means that all the card needs is decent handling of the digital signal and the card will be good. For people on AVS who mainly listen to stereo music and/or DVD's, this is perfect because they want a simple connection that will let their receiver do the work instead of the sound card(because the receiver they spent $1000 or more is likely better than the sound card at the D/A conversion). So paying for a X-fi or X-Meridian sound card does not make any sense!

For low end computer setups where perfect audio reproduction isn't required but decent audio that is better than a crackly onboard is...the chaintech is occasionally recommended for its high price/performance ratio. But it is not the end all of sound cards by any means.

You might have better things to do but, sadly, since I am just sitting around waiting for graduation ceremonies...I do not. :)

Hope that helps clear up the confusion(and BTW I have been a member over at AVS for a while now ;))
 

Ken90630

Golden Member
Mar 6, 2004
1,571
2
81
Originally posted by: Sdiver2489
While I agree that the drivers for the chaintech are much better and simpler. The fact is it does fall short in simple things like frequency response. Look up some RMAA tests and you will see that even using the surround outs for stereo(which are better than the fronts) still don't give you a linear frequency response out of the card. The X-fi does beat this and it will trounce it in signal to noise ratio and THD.
It's been awhile since I looked at specs for the AV-710 (a year or two?), and I don't recall OTTOMH what they are. When I was card shopping for myself at the time, I researched this and came to the conclusion that the AV-710 was prolly the best solution for simple 2.1 stereo playback (of music, not games) into computer speakers (which is what the OP is also looking for). This was mainly due to the Wolfson DACs available in Channels 7&8 and the lack of the horrible re-sampling that the Creative Audigy (and other) cards were doing. And I could be mistaken, but I also have it in my head that credible tests of FR, S/N ratio and THD weren't exactly abundant at the time either. :p Computer guys reviewing audio products is usually a dicey proposition, and you have to take what they say with a large grain of salt. If you can provide a link to the "RMAA" tests you mention, I'll be glad to take a look at them. :)

Originally posted by: Sdiver2489
When it comes to digital, the quality of the op amps no longer applies, nor the D/A converter. This means that all the card needs is decent handling of the digital signal and the card will be good. For people on AVS who mainly listen to stereo music and/or DVD's, this is perfect because they want a simple connection that will let their receiver do the work instead of the sound card(because the receiver they spent $1000 or more is likely better than the sound card at the D/A conversion). So paying for a X-fi or X-Meridian sound card does not make any sense!
I agree 100%. :) But this is irrelevant since the OP said he's going to run the card directly out to computer speakers. What will matter to him is the simple D/A signal chain, not digital out, right?

When I said "tough to beat," I meant for what he's going to be using it for. Whether or not F/R, S/N ratio or THD differences between an AV-710 or X-Fi would be audible in his situation, I can't say without knowing more (like the specs of his Monsoon speakers, for example).

For low end computer setups where perfect audio reproduction isn't required but decent audio that is better than a crackly onboard is...the chaintech is occasionally recommended for its high price/performance ratio. But it is not the end all of sound cards by any means.
I agree, and I never said it was the end all of sound cards. I said it would be tough (not impossible) to beat for simple 2.1 quality sound to a set of computer speakers (with music, not gaming, as source material). There are a lot of cards out there from Creative, Turtle Beach, and others with prices 2 or 3 times that of the AV-710 that are inferior to the AV-710's analog stereo output quality into computer speakers. I assume you'd agree.

You might have better things to do but, sadly, since I am just sitting around waiting for graduation ceremonies...I do not.
Well, family responsibilies, along with a car restoration project and ongoing home restoration projects don't allow me much time for computer dabbling these days. So I grab a few minutes here & there when I can. :p

Good luck with your graduation.
 

Sdiver2489

Senior member
Nov 7, 2003
303
0
0
The bluegears is the same as the X-meridian minus the analog section that the X-meridian excels in
 

aCynic2

Senior member
Apr 28, 2007
710
0
0
Originally posted by: Sdiver2489
The bluegears is the same as the X-meridian minus the analog section that the X-meridian excels in

Ok, just so I can grok when that becomes essential or useful...

Is that where you and sound man were talking about a receiver in the sound system?

And how would that plug in? Through the S/PDIF ports?
 

Sdiver2489

Senior member
Nov 7, 2003
303
0
0
Originally posted by: aCynic2
Originally posted by: Sdiver2489
The bluegears is the same as the X-meridian minus the analog section that the X-meridian excels in

Ok, just so I can grok when that becomes essential or useful...

Is that where you and sound man were talking about a receiver in the sound system?

And how would that plug in? Through the S/PDIF ports?

Yes, if you are connecting to a receiver then the analog portion of the meridian becomes useless as you will be using your receiver instead. This is typically connected via digital coax or optical out, both of which the x-meridian has.
 

aCynic2

Senior member
Apr 28, 2007
710
0
0
Originally posted by: Sdiver2489
Yes, if you are connecting to a receiver then the analog portion of the meridian becomes useless as you will be using your receiver instead. This is typically connected via digital coax or optical out, both of which the x-meridian has.


Ok, that's not exactly how I was thinking. I thought the purpose of the analog of the card was to hook to a receiver.

If a receiver is used, the analog of the card is not and the analog side of the card is beneficial when a receiver is not available. I take then, typical computer speakers, say logitech Z-5500s, are not useful in such a case of using analog signaling?

Does the input change? IOW, the file, say a music file, since I can't imagine a computer able to send an analog "file" to the sound card for playback.

The more I learn, the deeper I'm looking at my sound card choice.
 

Sdiver2489

Senior member
Nov 7, 2003
303
0
0
Originally posted by: aCynic2
Originally posted by: Sdiver2489
Yes, if you are connecting to a receiver then the analog portion of the meridian becomes useless as you will be using your receiver instead. This is typically connected via digital coax or optical out, both of which the x-meridian has.


Ok, that's not exactly how I was thinking. If a receiver is used, the analog of the card is not. So, the analog side of the card is beneficial when a receiver is not available. I take then, typical computer speakers are not useful in such a case of using analog signaling?

How does the input change? IOW, the file, say a music file, since I can't imagine a computer able to send an analog "file" to the sound card for playback.

Your question is a bit confusing the way it is worded. I will take my best shot at what you are asking.

Computer speakers are typically hooked up via analog connections. This will use the analog side of the meridian card.

A receiver can either receive a digital or analog signal. If it receives an analog signal, it amplifies it and sends it to the speakers. If it receives a digital signal, it must be first converter to analog. This uses the receivers DACs(digital to analog converters). The quality of these is a major component of the final quality of the audio. Once it has been converter it then receives the same treatment as the analog input.


In a computer it is much the same. However, the input to the sound card is always digital. The sound card then handles whether it should be converted to analog and sent to the speakers/receiver or kept in a digital format that the receiver can understand/decode.
The key difference here being which component is doing the D-A conversion...the sound card or the receiver. The conversion has to happen at some point as there is no such thing as a speaker driver which uses a digital signal. The conversion should be done by the component with the highest quality DAC.
 

aCynic2

Senior member
Apr 28, 2007
710
0
0
Originally posted by: Sdiver2489
Your question is a bit confusing the way it is worded. I will take my best shot at what you are asking.

Sorry, but the last time I bought a separate sound card was a SB Live! Value back in...oh...1999, maybe, and since it was for games, I didn't consider other issues. Now, I'm looking very carefully at music, game sound being a close second.

The $169.99 seemed a bit steep, but if I buy the Logitech Z-5500s at TechnoWeb, I can shave almost $40 off their cost, minimizing the impact of the X-Meridian to the overall pricetag.

I'm trying to see where else I can shave some $$$ off the final cost w/o losing too much to shipping cost.


 

Sdiver2489

Senior member
Nov 7, 2003
303
0
0
Originally posted by: aCynic2
Originally posted by: Sdiver2489
Your question is a bit confusing the way it is worded. I will take my best shot at what you are asking.

Sorry, but the last time I bought a separate sound card was a SB Live! Value back in...oh...1999, maybe, and since it was for games, I didn't consider other issues. Now, I'm looking very carefully at music, game sound being a close second.

The $169.99 seemed a bit steep, but if I buy the Logitech Z-5500s at TechnoWeb, I can shave almost $40 off their cost, minimizing the impact of the X-Meridian to the overall pricetag.

I'm trying to see where else I can shave some $$$ off the final cost w/o losing too much to shipping cost.

might want to take a look at the X-Fi Prelude from Auzentech. Supposedly it will be released this month. Unfortunately, it may carry a high price tag. However, it will use the X-fi chipset for more game audio effects.
 

Ken90630

Golden Member
Mar 6, 2004
1,571
2
81
Originally posted by: Sdiver2489
Thanks and I agree with pretty much everything you said there...Here is a goos comparison between the two.

http://audio.rightmark.org/downloads/So...0And%20Results%20For%20RMAA%20v5.5.pdf

http://www.calroth.net/alien_dac_rmaa/

but you are right, if the users speakers aren't that great...the AV-710 is a good option as the difference although major on paper, isn't worth the cash.

Hey, Sdiver2489,

I finally got a few minutes here to read your post and check out those links. My impressions:

Unless I'm missing something, I have to tell 'ya that I don't see the "major difference" you mention. Let's take frequency response, for example: According to those tests, the FR with the X-Fi Elite Pro, measured with the 24/96 parameters, is ridiculously flat from 40Hz to 15KHz -- only up 1/10th of a decibel and down 7/10ths of a decibel. The Chaintech measures up 12/100ths (or 1.2/10ths) of a decibel and down only 6/10ths of a decibel. Since 1 decibel is the smallest amount of perceptible volume a human can detect, no human could possibly hear any difference whatsoever between these two cards in the frequency response department. Those variations are so low, in fact, that I'm surprised they could even be measured accurately (for the sake of this discussion, however, I'll give the testers the benefit of the doubt and assume they were). In short, both cards are ostensibly perfectly flat (in audible terms) from 40Hz to 15KHz.

Note: I don't care much about the FR beyond 15KHz since very few people, except young children, can hear frequencies higher than that, but I would have liked the tests to have gone below 40Hz on the bass end. There is some musical information below 40Hz -- particularly in classical music -- and a component's ability or inability to reproduce it would be nice to know. As for the OP's system though, I doubt if his Monsoon speakers can produce much (if any?) usable output below 40Hz, so it's more or less irrelevant here.

You also said earlier that the X-Fi would "trounce it in signal to noise ratio and THD." Maybe I'm missing something, but I'm not seeing any S/N ratio measurements in the tests you linked to. Unless they're calling S/N ratio "dynamic range" (which is usually a separate spec from S/N ratio). :confused:

Re the dynamic range spec, yes, the X-Fi does measure better, but I would opine that the difference between 94.7 and 112.5 is not terribly significant. Both are outstanding by any measure. If one wants to debate 'levels of excellence,' okay, but I personally wouldn't put a lot of stock in the importance of the difference in this case. I'd also opine that other than with classical music, few (if any) people would ever hear the difference. With any kind of modern music (rock, pop, alt, jazz, country, hip-hop, whatever) a dynamic range of 94.7 is more than enough. Would you concur?

As for THD ("total harmonic distortion," for any newbies reading this), the X-Fi measures .0007% (i.e., 7/10,000ths of a percent) and the Chaintech measures .0010 (10/10,000ths of a percent). Both are completely and utterly inaudible to humans, so the difference is irrelevant. No offense, man :), but I personally wouldn't say that 3/10,000ths of a percent difference would constitute "trouncing." :laugh:

The noise level and IM (intermodulation distortion) specs are similarly inconsequential in my opinion. In fact, based on these particular tests/reviews, I would just about conclude that both cards are essentially 'neutral' in terms of causing any significant, tangible degradation or coloration of the audio signal (at least from 40Hz to 15KHz, anyway). In fact, they both measured better than I would have predicted. Would you agree?

I admittedly didn't take the time to read/study every page of both tests, but this is my take based on what I've had time to read today. So am I missing something here, or ???

Interesting discussion, BTW, and it's nice to be able to bat around ideas/opinions without the personal attacks that so often ruin these threads. :cool:

Oh, and while I'm at it, what's your pick for the "best" card right now (for music running direct into 2.1 speakers, not gaming)? You're prolly you're tuned into this stuff than I am right now. Do you like the X-Fi, or the Oxygen card, or ???
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
DAMN!
I thought YoYo was a nerd, but you guys are bitch-slapping him right now! :Q

EDIT: As for me, I have an Audigy 1 and it works just fine.
No sound problems in any games, and while driver updates have been sparse, there HAVE been updates and the latest work just fine for eveything.
Sound quality is pristine through my Logitech Z-5300's. Those seemingly small and cheap speakers produce the same little details that my nice Sony Home Theater system picks out when I listen to music in the living room.
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
11
81
0.001% (or -100dB) THD can be heard, seeing as you don't know the type of distortion.
 

YOyoYOhowsDAjello

Moderator<br>A/V & Home Theater<br>Elite member
Aug 6, 2001
31,205
45
91
Originally posted by: shortylickens
DAMN!
I thought YoYo was a nerd, but you guys are bitch-slapping him right now! :Q

bitch-slapping? I didn't even post in this thread yet :p
 

Ken90630

Golden Member
Mar 6, 2004
1,571
2
81
Originally posted by: Howard
0.001% (or -100dB) THD can be heard, seeing as you don't know the type of distortion.
:confused: Gotta disagree with you there, mate.

It's been generally held that less than 1%THD is not detectable except by only those with the most highly trained (aka "golden") ears. And 1/1000th of one percent distortion is barely measurable by properly calibrated test equipment, never mind being audible to any human. This has been stated repeatedly over the years in the various tests/reviews in prominent audio magazines I've read for more than 20 years. If you can cite supporting evidence or a credible source for your statement, I'd like to see it.

I'm also puzzled by your parenthetical reference of "or (-100dB)," implying that that equals .001% distortion. This is incorrect. A spec of .001%THD is a measure of the distortion of the original audio waveform and has nothing whatsoever to do with volume, "-100dB" or otherwise. I don't know where you got that idea.

You also say, " ... seeing as you don't know the type of distortion." As stated, THD is total harmonic distortion -- that is the type of distortion. It's not IM (intermodulation distortion), or TIM (transient intermodulation distortion), or any other kind -- it's THD. So what do you mean we don't know the type of distortion? :confused:
 

Ken90630

Golden Member
Mar 6, 2004
1,571
2
81
Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
Originally posted by: shortylickens
DAMN!
I thought YoYo was a nerd, but you guys are bitch-slapping him right now! :Q

bitch-slapping? I didn't even post in this thread yet :p
Yeah, I was kinda thinking the same thing. :confused:

Heh heh ... I can't say whether DAjello is a nerd or not since I don't know him personally. I will say (and I don't mean to sound like a kiss-butt here) that he seems pretty knowledgeable and I've learned a lot from his postings. I've prolly got aways to go before I'm qualified to e-"bitch-slap" him. :p

Comical .... :laugh:
 

Jules

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,213
0
76
Im also looking for one also. My XFI Xtrememusic sucks on my current board and makes alot of crackling and popping.