• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

See anything wrong with this?

Slammy1

Platinum Member
It worries me to get into an area o/c'ing that is not written up more. I only just upgraded a few months ago from my P3-850 which scored 780 on 3dMark01. I upped the voltage on my HyperX to 2.85V and I'm running stable at 380FSB on a 5:4. I still have some testing to do, but it should've failed if it were going to. Do you see any problems? I've been cautious, and my temps are 31C Idle 47-48C stress. It seems too much for air, I didn't know if I'm missing anything important.

System
P4P800-D
P4 2.4C
2X256 HyperX PC3500
WD Raptor Primary
WD 80GB Caviar SE
9700Pro AIW
CM ATC-201C unmodded
7000CU HSF
Antec True 480W PSU
Audigy 2

BIOS
Overclock: Manual (280MHz = 3.38GHz, 224MHz DDR)
Performance Mode: Standard
Memory Freq: 320MHz
Memory Accel: Enabled
DRAM Idle Timer &Refresh Rate: Auto
Mem 2-3-3-7-8
VDIMM: 2.85
VCORE: 1.55 (+0.05 over volt=1.60V)
Catalyst 3.6 Omega
Graphic Aperture: 128MB
Rage3D 371/342
 
Memory Freq: 320MHz

That's the only thing that doesn't look right. At 280fsb, it should be at 186mhz (3:2) or 224mhz (5:4) x2 for DDR, which are both over 320mhz. I see on the Overclock line above it, it lists 224 DDR, which is correct, but what is that Memory Frequency then?

Otherwise, that's a very nice overclock 🙂
 
Yeah. Great OC especially for a 1st. My first venture wasn't nearly as pleasing.

You should feel a small difference from the p3. What kind of 3dmark01 improvement did that get you.
 
19157 3dMark01. As far as other benches, I get the following:

PCMark2002
CPU 8305
Mem 9988
HD 1302

Sis Sandra
CPU Arithmetic 16567 (Dhrystone-10367, Whetstone-2907/6502)
CPU Multimedia 40421
Memory Bandwidth 11803 (5957/5966 Buff, 4141/4132 Unbuff)
File System 33567

I don't know if I ran unbuffered correctly, I only took off the one option.
 
I'll check when I get home (which could be really late), and assuming nothing blows up I'll repost the buffered. I know people are running faster, it's just they all seem to be running water or phase cooling. I haven't tried any higher, I'll probably sit on this o/c for a bit until I feel safe. Thanks.
 
I know a friend whos running his 2.4c @3.6c, using corsair 3500 XMS 2x512, slk-900u and a tornado fan. But hes also using a 1.725vcore. He doesnt really thing that using anything over 1.65vcore is dangerous. So he is running 3.6ghz full stable. Id try running 3.6ghz, but i aint going above 1.65vcore. I dont wanna fry my chip. He runs at the same temperatures as he would at a default vcore amazingly, 55c max full load. about 35c idle. He's been running his chip at that speed for months, so i dont think its really that dangerous to use air cooling as long as you have the right heatsink/fan combonation. But i woudlnt go raising the vcore above 1.675 at most. I'm afraid to even run mine at 1.65v.
 
Well that made a difference, 2603/2686. It is nice to know I'm not frying my CPU. I worry some about 2.85 for the HyperX, but I have seen o/c's posted where people have done that. LOL. I wonder if I can eek 285 at a 5:4 on this. I did on a 3:2 just long enough to benchmark it, but it wasn't stable. I told myself I'd only go as high as I could on a 5:4, I may need to retract that thought and reconsider.
 
Back
Top