• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Second Mars Rover w/ Trouble

Time to go whoop some Martian ass . . .

"You trying to be a hero!??"
"I just wanna kill some bugs, sir!"

😉
 
Originally posted by: thejackal1
Next time we need to spend the money to fix the problems in America.
Click to expand...

As if that $800 million would have solved anything here...
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: JohnCU
Yeah, it is easy to get mad and say what a bunch of idiots, but just to land the thing is amazing.
Click to expand...

I don't get how people always say this. Given a few years and 850 million to play with I'm pretty sure I, along with the best design team I could buy, could build a pair a rovers that could land on mars and break within a matter of hours. I think most of us probably could. This is assuming that the rockets that boosted them into space aren't part of that budget too. I'd imagine those are fairly spendy :Q
 
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Originally posted by: JohnCU
Yeah, it is easy to get mad and say what a bunch of idiots, but just to land the thing is amazing.
Click to expand...

I don't get how people always say this. Given a few years and 850 million to play with I'm pretty sure I, along with the best design team I could buy, could build a pair a rovers that could land on mars and break within a matter of hours. I think most of us probably could. This is assuming that the rockets that boosted them into space aren't part of that budget too. I'd imagine those are fairly spendy :Q
Click to expand...

The first one is not broken - they already hit ctrl-alt-delete and are running memtest86 to make sure the RAM is still kosher. However, due to the stupid huge latency, that'll take awhile.

The second one is either a short circuit or a faulty temperature probe in a system with redundancy. They just have to figure out how the heck to cut power.
 
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Originally posted by: JohnCU
Yeah, it is easy to get mad and say what a bunch of idiots, but just to land the thing is amazing.
Click to expand...

I don't get how people always say this. Given a few years and 850 million to play with I'm pretty sure I, along with the best design team I could buy, could build a pair a rovers that could land on mars and break within a matter of hours. I think most of us probably could. This is assuming that the rockets that boosted them into space aren't part of that budget too. I'd imagine those are fairly spendy :Q
Click to expand...

The first one is not broken - they already hit ctrl-alt-delete and are running memtest86 to make sure the RAM is still kosher. However, due to the stupid huge latency, that'll take awhile.

The second one is either a short circuit or a faulty temperature probe in a system with redundancy. They just have to figure out how the heck to cut power.
Click to expand...


Well, I'll admit I haven't been following the missions too closely but according to that article Spirit has been busted since Wednesday. The latency on the other hand, should only be a bit over 3 minutes. That's a bit of a time disparity 😉
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top