Sean Hannity: "If Obama Is Re-Elected, It's The End Time In America As We Know It"

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
C

CitizenKain

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2000
4,480
14
76
spidey07 said:
This thread is full born proof they live in alternate reality and refuse facts and the brilliant clarity of truth.
Click to expand...

I don't think anyone who thought Rick Perry was ever presidential material could accuse anyone else of living in a alternate reality.
 
zinfamous

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,095
30,041
146
spidey07 said:
I posted the fact and truth and you come back with obama talking points and propaganda? Praise be obama, his greatness. By golly he cleaned that spill right up and stuck it to the big bad oil companies!

This is the mind of the liberal, it's what they believe. This thread is full born proof they live in alternate reality and refuse facts and the brilliant clarity of truth.
Click to expand...

Obama talking points?

I've never really listened to anything he said regarding the Oil spill, only the facts contained within the reports.

We know you have a problem with facts, as they conflict with your one-world view, but, seriously man...
 
zinfamous

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,095
30,041
146
monovillage said:
They asked, you delivered and now they dance, dance, dance to avoid giving you at least partial credit.
Click to expand...

haha, I just saw SPidey's article.


It does seem a bit retarded on the surface, but the article doesn't specifically blame Bush for Katrina--the actual creation of the hurricane.

I know subtlety isn't you guy's strong point, and literacy tends to be a passing fancy, but here is the sentence with which you use to misinterpret the article's message

Our destructive addiction has given us a catastrophic war in the Middle East and--now--Katrina is giving our nation a glimpse of the climate chaos we are bequeathing our children.
Click to expand...

It simply repeats the prevailing scientific opinion--completely undisputed in the world of peer-reviewed science--that current trends are leading towards more extreme wether patters. We very much do know that CO2 is a major factor (especially when it comes to oceanic acidification, not so much atmospheric), and the idea of not controlling our oiutput is, well, completely retarded.

Funny, too, that the article spends time showing how Bush/Cheney and Co. had a very progressive, er, I mean "evil librul!" stance on regulating CO2 and controlling climate change, before some other pigheaded blowhard crony approaching them regarding the disastrous effects their policy would have on their own personal finances.

So, yeah--Bush actually wanted to affect legitimate progress in climate science, until it was explained to him that his investments would be hurt.
 
hal2kilo

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
24,154
10,839
136
zinfamous said:
haha, I just saw SPidey's article.


It does seem a bit retarded on the surface, but the article doesn't specifically blame Bush for Katrina--the actual creation of the hurricane.

I know subtlety isn't you guy's strong point, and literacy tends to be a passing fancy, but here is the sentence with which you use to misinterpret the article's message



It simply repeats the prevailing scientific opinion--completely undisputed in the world of peer-reviewed science--that current trends are leading towards more extreme wether patters. We very much do know that CO2 is a major factor (especially when it comes to oceanic acidification, not so much atmospheric), and the idea of not controlling our oiutput is, well, completely retarded.

Funny, too, that the article spends time showing how Bush/Cheney and Co. had a very progressive, er, I mean "evil librul!" stance on regulating CO2 and controlling climate change, before some other pigheaded blowhard crony approaching them regarding the disastrous effects their policy would have on their own personal finances.

So, yeah--Bush actually wanted to affect legitimate progress in climate science, until it was explained to him that his investments would be hurt.
Click to expand...

Well, you know Cheney had that meeting and well it was decided that it was time to put the clamp on GWBs nuts.
 
C

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
349
126
WhipperSnapper said:
He probably said the exact same thing four years ago.
Click to expand...

They've said the same thing for decades every election.

Every election, the country faces destruction if the Democrat is elected.

Democrats say the country is in danger of great harm if the Republican is elected, but they're correct. Wars, debt, financial crash, civil rights, corruption, etc.
 
C

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
349
126
manimal said:
Thx
Click to expand...

Funny enough as I pointed you to MSNBC shows like Rachel Maddow, I ran accross this:

Conservative pundit and columnist Cal Thomas took a particularly nasty jab at Rachel Maddow at Thursday's CPAC conference in Washington.

During a panel at the conference, a clip of Maddow's appearance on Sunday's "Meet the Press" was played. In it, Maddow said that Republicans are "waging war on contraception."

"I'm really glad...that you played the Rachel Maddow clip," Thomas said after the audience booed a bit, "because I think that she is the best argument in favor of her parents using contraception." As the audience cheered, he continued, "I would be all for that and all the rest of the crowd at MSNBC too for that matter."

UPDATE: Thomas, who is a regular on Fox News, received a sharp rebuke from colleague Greta Van Susteren on Thursday night.

"Cal Thomas needs to pick up the phone and make a personal call to Rachel Maddow," she wrote on her blog. "Then he needs to publicly apologize."
Click to expand...

As a reminder, Thomas is a former leader of 'Moral Majority'. A real scumbag.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom