Originally posted by: tm37
HMMM I have onboard SATA
What type of speed increase do you see with SATA drives?
Originally posted by: s0ssos
i simply don't see why people get sata or the raptor. what's the point? it costs so much ($111 for the raptor? that's like $3/gig) that you might as well go scsi
Originally posted by: orion7144
Originally posted by: s0ssos
i simply don't see why people get sata or the raptor. what's the point? it costs so much ($111 for the raptor? that's like $3/gig) that you might as well go scsi
Because it is cheaper than SCSI and in a RAID 0 setup my WinXP Pron install times went from ~30 min to less than 10 min. Seek times and xfer rates are much better too. BTW I am using 2 Raptors and was comparing to 2 WD 120gig SE drives in RAID 0 as well.
Originally posted by: Engineer
oops...you guys are right. They do have a native SATA interface...but do NOT have SATA command Queuing (200GB model first to have that).
![]()
Originally posted by: ScrapSilicon
Originally posted by: orion7144
Originally posted by: s0ssos
i simply don't see why people get sata or the raptor. what's the point? it costs so much ($111 for the raptor? that's like $3/gig) that you might as well go scsi
Because it is cheaper than SCSI and in a RAID 0 setup my WinXP Pron install times went from ~30 min to less than 10 min. Seek times and xfer rates are much better too. BTW I am using 2 Raptors and was comparing to 2 WD 120gig SE drives in RAID 0 as well.
MS' new OS ..?![]()
