Hmm. I bought three Seagate Backup Plus 3TB USB hard drives one day at Costco a little over a year ago. The warranty is 2 years.
I've gotten several
Delayed Write Failed errors using one of the drives. The drive has 827 hours of use on it, only 131GB of data, currently. After the failure a couple of days ago I ran Seatools tests on it (the Basic Tests, which Seatools says will not alter data, they are read only). The Generic Short Test passed, but the Generic Long Test was extremely slow and put up this message twice (I ran the test again having rebooted the computer, and had no other apps running):
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long Test Time
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
! Model ST3000DM001-1ER166 Serial: Z5000QEY
The test is taking a long time. This could be caused by large
drive capacity, excessive retries, multiple drives under test,
system overhead, or other applications running at the same time.
You may abort this test at any time.
[OK]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As you can see in the above quoted Seatools' message, the drive model is ST3000DM001. This is the same as the ~5000 HDs that are reported as highly problematic in the link in the OP!
I'm wondering what to do now. I think the important data is backed up elsewhere, have to make sure about that. I am thinking about calling Seagate, think maybe I should run more tests including the Fix tests, which attempt to fix bad sectors. I got the idea of running the Fix test(s) from
Seagate's How to use Seatools page.
One reason I bought the Seagate drives is because I've had 3-4 failures using Western Digital 2TB ELEMENTS USB hard drives. In short, I've found them
highly unreliable. As well, the WD drives were warranted for only 1 year. I have a handful of Seagate IDE HDs that haven't failed me, had them for around 10 years.
I'm thinking that the message above could well assure that there are too many bad sectors, period. Now, I bought my ST3000DM001 HDs in May 2014, much later than the HDs with a high rate of failure discussed in the link at the OP, which are from ~2 years earlier. Hopefully, mine are better.

Thoughts?