R rc5 Platinum Member Oct 13, 1999 2,464 1 0 Jul 1, 2001 #1 In pricewatch, you can find PC-133 512MB for $41 PC-133 256MB for $18 Just a year ago, I paid $40 for a pathetic 32MB PC100! Why are SDRAM becoming so cheap? Why haven't we seen PC-133 1024MB and 2048MB appearing on the markest?
In pricewatch, you can find PC-133 512MB for $41 PC-133 256MB for $18 Just a year ago, I paid $40 for a pathetic 32MB PC100! Why are SDRAM becoming so cheap? Why haven't we seen PC-133 1024MB and 2048MB appearing on the markest?
R rc5 Platinum Member Oct 13, 1999 2,464 1 0 Jul 1, 2001 #2 Okay, PC133-1GB is $298, PC133-4GB is $2500 Are they for real??
T TheShiz Diamond Member Oct 9, 1999 3,846 0 0 Jul 1, 2001 #3 not many motherboards take more than 512 megs per module at the moment.
S Shooters Diamond Member Sep 29, 2000 3,100 0 76 Jul 1, 2001 #4 << In pricewatch, you can find PC-133 512MB for $41 PC-133 256MB for $18 Just a year ago, I paid $40 for a pathetic 32MB PC100! >> Yup, I paid $80 for a 64MB stick of PC100 less than a year ago. << Why are SDRAM becoming so cheap? >> I don't know, but I'm not complaining. << Why haven't we seen PC-133 1024MB and 2048MB appearing on the markest? >> It would be tough to squeeze that much memory onto one DIMM, and I don't know of any motherboard that can handle 1 or 2 gig sticks of RAM.
<< In pricewatch, you can find PC-133 512MB for $41 PC-133 256MB for $18 Just a year ago, I paid $40 for a pathetic 32MB PC100! >> Yup, I paid $80 for a 64MB stick of PC100 less than a year ago. << Why are SDRAM becoming so cheap? >> I don't know, but I'm not complaining. << Why haven't we seen PC-133 1024MB and 2048MB appearing on the markest? >> It would be tough to squeeze that much memory onto one DIMM, and I don't know of any motherboard that can handle 1 or 2 gig sticks of RAM.
H HansXP Diamond Member Jun 1, 2001 3,093 0 0 Jul 1, 2001 #6 That's probably pretty crappy RAM. Regular stuff is still a little more expensive, but still VERY cheap. Why are you complaining?
That's probably pretty crappy RAM. Regular stuff is still a little more expensive, but still VERY cheap. Why are you complaining?
M Mday Lifer Oct 14, 1999 18,647 1 81 Jul 1, 2001 #7 most of these are high density packages which are useless on intel boards. =(
R raven82 Senior member Mar 30, 2001 377 0 0 Jul 1, 2001 #8 I always knew it was a good choice to buy my thunderbird and not a PIII
heat23 Elite Member Oct 9, 1999 3,998 9 81 www.heatware.com Jul 1, 2001 #9 1 or 2 years ago what was the price for 128 megs ram?? like $300 or something??
RossMAN Grand Nagus Feb 24, 2000 78,928 389 136 Jul 1, 2001 #10 Too bad my Intel i815e or is it 815e, I think it's the latter maxes out at 512 with 2 slots.
H HansXP Diamond Member Jun 1, 2001 3,093 0 0 Jul 2, 2001 #11 << Too bad my Intel i815e or is it 815e, I think it's the latter maxes out at 512 with 2 slots. >> Yep, the 815 chipset maxes out at 512 MB RAM. That's probably its one big flaw
<< Too bad my Intel i815e or is it 815e, I think it's the latter maxes out at 512 with 2 slots. >> Yep, the 815 chipset maxes out at 512 MB RAM. That's probably its one big flaw
E EvanFerguson Banned May 14, 2001 956 0 0 Jul 2, 2001 #12 yum yum! computers are getting so cheap, it's great
RossMAN Grand Nagus Feb 24, 2000 78,928 389 136 Jul 2, 2001 #13 Yep, the 815 chipset maxes out at 512 MB RAM. That's probably its one big flaw I'm sure that it has other major flaws but maxing out at 512 is indeed one of them, I want 2GB RAM!
Yep, the 815 chipset maxes out at 512 MB RAM. That's probably its one big flaw I'm sure that it has other major flaws but maxing out at 512 is indeed one of them, I want 2GB RAM!
D Doctorweir Golden Member Sep 20, 2000 1,689 0 0 Jul 2, 2001 #14 Soon the memory manufacturers may have to pull the emergency break...they don't run profitable any longer...:frown:
Soon the memory manufacturers may have to pull the emergency break...they don't run profitable any longer...:frown: