But then, the Irish don't want to pronounce three 'three' either.
Either way, I was thinking about using a scsi disk as my system disk.
Reasons : 1. I happen to like 'survivor' formats.
2. Always been relatively reliable (relatively long-lived)
3. Fast
4. SATA is so very mainstream
5. As someone else said, chicks like scsi
, so now that I've blown everyone away with my seriousness, I'll get to the point.
I've read various threads on this forum, I've tried to look at scsi-guides, but there are things that only seem to have rather vague answers.
1. Would most scsi disks with an ultra320 interface be crippled by an ultra160 controller card on a PCI bus? If so - mostly then by the bus or by the card?
2. Would a Seagate Cheetah 10k.7 10000 rpms or a Maxtor Atlas 15k 15000 rpms be quieter, cooler, faster (if anyone has had any experience of both?)
3. Thank you for your patience.
Either way, I was thinking about using a scsi disk as my system disk.
Reasons : 1. I happen to like 'survivor' formats.
2. Always been relatively reliable (relatively long-lived)
3. Fast
4. SATA is so very mainstream
5. As someone else said, chicks like scsi
, so now that I've blown everyone away with my seriousness, I'll get to the point.
I've read various threads on this forum, I've tried to look at scsi-guides, but there are things that only seem to have rather vague answers.
1. Would most scsi disks with an ultra320 interface be crippled by an ultra160 controller card on a PCI bus? If so - mostly then by the bus or by the card?
2. Would a Seagate Cheetah 10k.7 10000 rpms or a Maxtor Atlas 15k 15000 rpms be quieter, cooler, faster (if anyone has had any experience of both?)
3. Thank you for your patience.
