• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Scrolling taking huge CPU resources

Deanodarlo

Senior member
Just a general observation. I wondered why in this day and age some websites take a large amount of CPU simply to scroll a page? For instance:

http://www.planetf1.com/

I think it's mainly ones with multiple layers or are graphic intensive.

Can't it be sorted out? Surely browsers should have hardware scrolling or something linked to the graphics card. It feels like Windows does without hardware acceleration and before you install graphics drivers.

Disabling smooth scrolling in supporting browsers helps a lot, but webpages taking massive CPU resources just to scroll up and down (also some flash heavy ones are CPU intensive just for viewing static pages!) is puzzling and annoying on laptops. Kills battery life and causes fans to spins up - just for moving around a bit of graphics on the screen.

On dual core CPU's it isn't as much of a problem, but I was surfing on a single core machine and 2.2Ghz Athlon 64 wasn't enough to SCROLL some web pages without massive slowdowns!!!! That's just silly!

Is it just progress? Or webpages and browsers abusing and taking for granted the power of modern CPU's?
 
Last edited:
Having a read, it just appears Windows GDI takes a lot of CPU usage to scroll under certain situations and browsers, like when it has to update all lines frequently using silky smooth scrolling.

They may be trying to sort it out in Windows 7 and future browsers with Direct2D, shifting rendering to the graphics card which is better at this sort of thing.
 
Last edited:
use chrome. disable flash. let us know how it goes.

if you are swapping to disk due to ram, that's another problem
 
engadget is a killer for old browsers (ie8) on old cpu's - yet the sister site gizmodo is fast.

(with flash disabled!) - go javascript!
 
Back
Top