Originally posted by: Lemon law
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Lemon law
One sexual transgression and all the other aspects of Edward's career are forgotten. Is that crazy or not? I could understand a similar reaction if the Edwards had just murdered someone or committed some heinous crime, but last time I checked, a male having sex with a consenting female he is not married to is not against any law. And if it were and vigorously enforced, we would not have enough jails in the country to hold all the offenders in even if we released every other category of criminal to make room.
Our society is incredibly up tight crazy about sexual taboos.
Wasnt it you who suggested a few weeks ago that Edward's wife may have allowed this to happen because she could not meet his sexual needs anymore?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To a certain extent yes Corbett, but not quite the way to attempt to distort it. And now given Elizabeth Edwards comments, its still not very definitive and not likely to become more defined in the future.
Its an issue that has come and it will fade like yesterday's news, but in general, the GOP has to very careful or the issues of McCain's infidelities have the potential to be the better swift boat target as the Presidential campaign of 08 progresses.
McCain is a under a media spot light, Edwards pain may be now, but Edwards is still a small side issue. At best the GOP can use Edwards to say some democrats are sexual libertines, but in any honest comparison in resent years, the GOP have more skeletons in their closet.