It has been brought to my attention that recently there have been questions and a great deal of confusion regarding the appraisal of physical attractive in the female form. In this essay, I wish to dispell certain rumors and extrapolate on my rationale and system of rating the female form.
First of all, it must be understood that there are three subdivisions within the "attractiveness" category. They are separate, yet tied to one another in ways that cannot be truly understood by mere mortals. They each have their own scale and ratings, and together add up to equal the total tally of the subject in question. Note that these wholly ignore such important qualities as personality, sense of humor, flexibility, kinkiness, wealth and sense of adventure.
The first category is "hotness." This is the plain old "Do I want to bang her until the cows come home or not?" Ratings on this scale depend entirely on such physical attributes such as breast size, fitness, roundess of buttocks and the sultriness of the facial expressions. Hotness seems to be a direct result of biological lust and as a result, we tend to classify women as hot that have higher-than-average child-rearing properties. Hot women usually instill an intense sense of sexual arousal in most heterosexual men and not much else. This characteristic is almost purely physical and generally accepted around the globe. There is very little disagreement among men in regard to this quality. A prime example of a female ranking high on the hot scale would be Heidi Klum.
The second category is "beauty." Beauty describes more of the classic elegance of a woman, especially in the facial features and overall body shape. One can be exquisitely beautiful without being overly hot, but when one is both, it is a great find. Beauty tends to be more subjective than hotness, but studies have shown that beauty is generally a result of having average features with nice symmetry and pleasing proportions. A good example of a beautiful woman would be Audrey Hepburn.
The third and final category of physical attractiveness is "cuteness." Again, this is completely separate from hotness and beauty, yet still intertwined. Cute refers to a more efferverscent quality, that of youth and in some ways a mixture of hotness and beauty. It is less tangible than the first two and I have spent many a year attempting to qualify it. In my experience, cute seems to be more subjective and a matter of personal preference than the first two categories, where the majory of men can agree most of the time. In my opinion, Mandy Moore, before she turned brunette, was the epitome of cute.
Now that I have laid the groundwork, it is important to understand that the overall physical attractiveness is dependent upon all three, and they average together. For example, a woman who ranks high in the beauty division but low in the other two will recieve a rating somewhere between the highest and lowest mark. Furthermore, a woman who ranks exceptionally high in all 3 categories is truly a remarkable spectacle. I am reasonably certain that most guys here would agree with in saying that Jessica Alba ranks extremely high in all 3 categories.
In closing, physical attractiveness is merely one facet of a woman's total image and should not be considered without analyzing other factors. However, when considered on its own, it is important to realize that it can be broken up into smaller portions, and dealt with consideringly. It is important to keep in mind that these are all very subjective and thus not everybody will be able to agree, but this method provides a cleaner, more elegant method to the age-old question of physical attractiveness. Thank you and good night.
First of all, it must be understood that there are three subdivisions within the "attractiveness" category. They are separate, yet tied to one another in ways that cannot be truly understood by mere mortals. They each have their own scale and ratings, and together add up to equal the total tally of the subject in question. Note that these wholly ignore such important qualities as personality, sense of humor, flexibility, kinkiness, wealth and sense of adventure.
The first category is "hotness." This is the plain old "Do I want to bang her until the cows come home or not?" Ratings on this scale depend entirely on such physical attributes such as breast size, fitness, roundess of buttocks and the sultriness of the facial expressions. Hotness seems to be a direct result of biological lust and as a result, we tend to classify women as hot that have higher-than-average child-rearing properties. Hot women usually instill an intense sense of sexual arousal in most heterosexual men and not much else. This characteristic is almost purely physical and generally accepted around the globe. There is very little disagreement among men in regard to this quality. A prime example of a female ranking high on the hot scale would be Heidi Klum.
The second category is "beauty." Beauty describes more of the classic elegance of a woman, especially in the facial features and overall body shape. One can be exquisitely beautiful without being overly hot, but when one is both, it is a great find. Beauty tends to be more subjective than hotness, but studies have shown that beauty is generally a result of having average features with nice symmetry and pleasing proportions. A good example of a beautiful woman would be Audrey Hepburn.
The third and final category of physical attractiveness is "cuteness." Again, this is completely separate from hotness and beauty, yet still intertwined. Cute refers to a more efferverscent quality, that of youth and in some ways a mixture of hotness and beauty. It is less tangible than the first two and I have spent many a year attempting to qualify it. In my experience, cute seems to be more subjective and a matter of personal preference than the first two categories, where the majory of men can agree most of the time. In my opinion, Mandy Moore, before she turned brunette, was the epitome of cute.
Now that I have laid the groundwork, it is important to understand that the overall physical attractiveness is dependent upon all three, and they average together. For example, a woman who ranks high in the beauty division but low in the other two will recieve a rating somewhere between the highest and lowest mark. Furthermore, a woman who ranks exceptionally high in all 3 categories is truly a remarkable spectacle. I am reasonably certain that most guys here would agree with in saying that Jessica Alba ranks extremely high in all 3 categories.
In closing, physical attractiveness is merely one facet of a woman's total image and should not be considered without analyzing other factors. However, when considered on its own, it is important to realize that it can be broken up into smaller portions, and dealt with consideringly. It is important to keep in mind that these are all very subjective and thus not everybody will be able to agree, but this method provides a cleaner, more elegant method to the age-old question of physical attractiveness. Thank you and good night.
