Scooter Libby, Cheney's chief of staff, fingered in Plame case

villager

Senior member
Oct 17, 2002
373
0
0
Story
Avoiding potential jail time, a Time magazine reporter has given a statement to prosecutors investigating the Bush administration leak of a covert CIA officer's identity.

In a statement Tuesday, Time said reporter Matthew Cooper agreed to give a deposition after Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, personally released Cooper from a promise of confidentiality about a conversation the two had last year.

Cooper was held in civil contempt earlier this month by U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan for refusing to testify in the leak probe. Hogan rejected Time's claims, as well as those of "Meet the Press" host Tim Russert, that the First Amendment protected them from having to testify.

Cooper had faced up to 18 months in jail and the magazine could have been forced to pay $1,000 a day under the contempt order, which has now been vacated. Russert avoided the contempt citation by agreeing earlier to an interview with prosecutors, again after Libby released him from a confidentiality promise.

Cooper gave his deposition Monday to the special prosecutor appointed in the case, U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald of Chicago, in the Washington office of his lawyer, Floyd Abrams, the magazine statement said. The deposition focused on a single July 2003 conversation between Cooper and Libby about the leak, the statement said.

Investigators are trying to find out who in the Bush administration leaked the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame, whose name was published by syndicated columnist Robert Novak on July 14, 2003. Novak cited two "senior administration officials" as his sources. It can be a felony to leak the name of an undercover officer.

The column came out about a week after Plame's husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, was critical in a newspaper opinion piece about President Bush's claim in his 2003 State of the Union address that Iraq sought to obtain uranium in Niger. The CIA had sent Wilson to Niger to investigate that claim, which he concluded was unfounded.

Glenn Kessler, a Washington Post reporter, also agreed to an interview in June after Libby agreed to release him from a similar promise.

Libby has been the focus of several subpoenas issued by prosecutors to journalists, but both Kessler and Russert said he did not provide Plame's name to them. Novak has repeatedly refused to say publicly who leaked the name to him and has not said whether he has received a subpoena.

Two other journalists ? Judith Miller of The New York Times and Walter Pincus of The Post ? have received subpoenas to testify in the case.

In a separate case, five reporters, including H. Josef Hebert of The Associated Press, were found in contempt last week for refusing to reveal their sources for stories about nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee. Lee is seeking the sources as part of his lawsuit against government agencies he says suggested he was a suspect in an investigation into possible theft of secrets from Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.

A $500-per-day fine was suspended pending appeals.

Nice job by Justice Department! Too bad Novak's seems off the hook. He really seems to be just a nasty guy and deserves some of the heat.
 

fjord

Senior member
Feb 18, 2004
667
0
0
Libby was just the delivery boy. It is Rove, Bush and Cheney who are most responsible.

Traitors all.
 

BDawg

Lifer
Oct 31, 2000
11,631
2
0
The real issue is why isn't Novak up on charges? He's the one who leaked the story to the public.
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
I agree, Novak should be dragged out of his home in chains. The bastard blew the cover of a CIA operative.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
I agree, Novak should be dragged out of his home in chains. The bastard blew the cover of a CIA operative.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I'm sorry, where's the disclaimer in the First Amendment saying that journalists don't have freedom of the press when it comes to exposing sources who will score you a tiny fraction of political advantage? If we followed by your rules, stories broken by leakers like Iran-Contra, the Pentagon Papers, domestic spying by the FBI on civil rights figures like MLK and other serious abuses of government would have never been exposed, and why? So you could have a 5-second story condemning the Vice President's Chief of Staff, who 99.9% of Americans don't know the name of and couldn't pick out from a police lineup? Any of all of you supporting either the contempt of court ruling or charging Novak, I'm absolutely ashamed to call you a fellow countryman of mine :|
 

BDawg

Lifer
Oct 31, 2000
11,631
2
0
Originally posted by: glenn1
I agree, Novak should be dragged out of his home in chains. The bastard blew the cover of a CIA operative.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I'm sorry, where's the disclaimer in the First Amendment saying that journalists don't have freedom of the press when it comes to exposing sources who will score you a tiny fraction of political advantage? If we followed by your rules, stories broken by leakers like Iran-Contra, the Pentagon Papers, domestic spying by the FBI on civil rights figures like MLK and other serious abuses of government would have never been exposed, and why? So you could have a 5-second story condemning the Vice President's Chief of Staff, who 99.9% of Americans don't know the name of and couldn't pick out from a police lineup? Any of all of you supporting either the contempt of court ruling or charging Novak, I'm absolutely ashamed to call you a fellow countryman of mine :|

I'm not upset that Novak did or didn't give up his source. I'm upset that Novak gave up the identity of a CIA operative. He should've known better and the 1st ammendment does not allow journalists to distribute top secret information.

Whistleblowers should be protected. Traitors should be punished.
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
glenn1
heh. As if Novak gives one sh!t about principles. He's a partisan hack.
Fine, be ashamed. Consider me not a "fellow countryman" (whatever that is) of yours. Boom. Done.