• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Scientology > Google

In response to a complaint we received under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 1 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint that caused the removal(s) at ChillingEffects.org.

THAT??? OMG DAMMIT
 
Tom Cruise? Kattie? Chef from south park? Who else? Maybe it was them

Complaing about what ? What about freedom of knowing ?
 
everybody gets ownd 🙁

edit: I love how the site is removed from the search function but a link at the bottom of said search function lists the site anyway! 😀
 
Originally posted by: OulOat
Ha, if you read the DMCA complaint, you can easily find out the removed site is xenu.net
Click to expand...

Which is the first result of the search. Doesn't look very "removed" to me. 😕
 
Did I miss something? I see the notice, but Xenu.net is the first link.

You have to wonder about a "religion" that protects its copyrights so vehemently. You'd think the true-hearted followers of good would spread their news of salvation for free, rather than charging you up the arse for it.

Xenu asks not your money, just your heart.
 
LOL at "Religious Technology Center". Guess the're finally gonna make the "God Machine" I've been reading about in all these sci-fi books.
 
Oh, I see. It was just the links to the specific offending articles/photos.

BTW, the explanation behind the name "Clambake" and the scientologists ideas of clams is pretty humorous.

Poor little clams! Snap snap snap!



(Xenu loves you.)
(Joanna may have given me crabs, but Xenu gave me Thetans!)
 
Originally posted by: hscorpio
You know somethings wrong when an organization goes to such great lengths to censor opposing viewpoints.

Here's an interesting video interview between a scientologist and the owner of the censored site.
Click to expand...

wow... that scientologist got pwned!

I underestimated the guy from Norway... but he knew his stuff, but also kept his cool and humbly pwned that dude
 
Originally posted by: dugweb
Originally posted by: hscorpio
You know somethings wrong when an organization goes to such great lengths to censor opposing viewpoints.

Here's an interesting video interview between a scientologist and the owner of the censored site.
Click to expand...

wow... that scientologist got pwned!

I underestimated the guy from Norway... but he knew his stuff, but also kept his cool and humbly pwned that dude
Click to expand...

Lol @ the "sacred" bits of Scientology.

Apparently we can't tell people the internal goings on of religions.
 
Originally posted by: Lonyo
Originally posted by: dugweb
Originally posted by: hscorpio
You know somethings wrong when an organization goes to such great lengths to censor opposing viewpoints.

Here's an interesting video interview between a scientologist and the owner of the censored site.
Click to expand...

wow... that scientologist got pwned!

I underestimated the guy from Norway... but he knew his stuff, but also kept his cool and humbly pwned that dude
Click to expand...

Lol @ the "sacred" bits of Scientology.

Apparently we can't tell people the internal goings on of religions.
Click to expand...


Yeah the scientologist had a hard time forming any good questions or arguments. The best he came up with was attacking the norwegian for choosing to criticize scientology when there are so many other issues in the world. Then he tries to claim they are legit and in the right because there are 'many' of them, and so few critics.
 
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: her209
I wish someone would just bitchslap those b*tches back to the last millenium.
Click to expand...
u mean the b*tches that passed the dmca bs?
Click to expand...
Yes, they need a good b*tchslapping also. It must be nice to be able to buy your own laws in Congress these days.
 
Originally posted by: mortong
Oh, I see. It was just the links to the specific offending articles/photos.

BTW, the explanation behind the name "Clambake" and the scientologists ideas of clams is pretty humorous.

Poor little clams! Snap snap snap!



(Xenu loves you.)
(Joanna may have given me crabs, but Xenu gave me Thetans!)
Click to expand...

OW! My jaw! You bastard!:|
 
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: her209
I wish someone would just bitchslap those b*tches back to the last millenium.
Click to expand...
u mean the b*tches that passed the dmca bs?
Click to expand...
Yes, they need a good b*tchslapping also. It must be nice to be able to buy your own laws in Congress these days.
Click to expand...

I have a good idea, let's combine the two. We can beat the Scientology people USING the people who passed the DMCA. I don't mean in the metaphorical sense, I mean using their physical bodies.
 
Originally posted by: SlitheryDee
LOL at "Religious Technology Center". Guess the're finally gonna make the "God Machine" I've been reading about in all these sci-fi books.
Click to expand...
Blasphemy, the God Machine already exists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top