Scientists find evidence for a ninth planet.

Jodell88

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2007
8,762
30
91
A planet larger than Earth could be hiding in the cold, dark depths of the solar system. The presence of the planet, which would lie far beyond Pluto, is betrayed by the curious orbits of a handful of distant icy worlds.

As described Wednesday in the Astronomical Journal, the gravitational signature of a large, lurking planet is written into the peculiar orbits of these farflung worlds. Called extreme Kuiper Belt Objects, the misbehaving bodies trace odd circles around the sun that have puzzled scientists for years.

It’s tantalizing evidence that a ninth large planet might live in the solar system, though the world hasn’t been detected yet.

“If there’s going to be another planet in the solar system, I think this is it,” says Greg Laughlin of the University of California, Santa Cruz. “It would be quite extraordinary if we had one. Fingers crossed. It would be amazing.”

The team calculated that the planet, if it’s there, would be about 10 times as massive as Earth, or roughly three times larger. That makes it a super-Earth or mini-Neptune—a type of planet the galaxy is incredibly efficient at assembling, but which has been conspicuously absent from our own neighborhood.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...s-newplanet&utm_campaign=Content&sf19289155=1

It will be very cool if it was proven to exist in my lifetime.
 
Last edited:

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,941
3,922
136
And yet regardless of mass, if it hasn't cleared it's orbit it won't officially be a planet according to the bogus rule that demoted Pluto.
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
I'm gonna go check out this planet after I get off from work. Hope there's not too much traffic on the way there. Might take me a few hundred years.
 

BarkingGhostar

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2009
8,410
1,617
136
Plutodog.gif
 

ImpulsE69

Lifer
Jan 8, 2010
14,946
1,077
126
Doesn't this theory come out like every year? I know I've heard this multiple times before.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
We already know how to build a New Horizons. Build another one, for a quick overview, and blast it out there at full speed for a fast flyby. :awe:



Doesn't this theory come out like every year? I know I've heard this multiple times before.
Those are usually accompanied with "The apocalypse NASA doesn't want you to know about! Send us money!"
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
We already know how to build a New Horizons. Build another one, for a quick overview, and blast it out there at full speed for a fast flyby. :awe:



Those are usually accompanied with "The apocalypse NASA doesn't want you to know about! Send us money!"

It took a perfect configuration of planets and timing to slingshot the way it did. We wouldn't be so fortunate for this new target we don't know anything about that might not even exist.
 

Schmide

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2002
5,747
1,039
126
Planet X? Finally we will get our rack-and-pinion molecule needed for yo-yo polish.
 

tynopik

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2004
5,245
500
126
And yet regardless of mass, if it hasn't cleared it's orbit it won't officially be a planet according to the bogus rule that demoted Pluto.

well,

Planet Nine gravitationally dominates its neighborhood of the solar system. In fact, it dominates a region larger than any of the other known planets—a fact that Brown says makes it "the most planet-y of the planets in the whole solar system."
 

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,728
4,697
75
We already know how to build a New Horizons. Build another one, for a quick overview, and blast it out there at full speed for a fast flyby. :awe:

Pluto was roughly 30AU away when we sent New Horizons. This new planet would be between 200 and 1200AU away! At the farthest possible distance it would take light (and radio) a week to reach us! :eek:

New Horizons took 9.5 years to go 30AU. So at that speed it would take at least 63 to 380 years to get to this new planet. Even if that length of time were acceptable, the radioisotope power source would be too weak to work within 35 years of launch.

I think this would be good practice for an interstellar mission, though. I propose a craft that loops close to the sun with a solar sail/solar collector powering an ion drive.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,082
136
And yet regardless of mass, if it hasn't cleared it's orbit it won't officially be a planet according to the bogus rule that demoted Pluto.

I thought pluto was demoted because it was tiny. And if we called THAT a planet, we'd also have to label a whole load of tiny orbiters planets as well.
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,941
3,922
136
I thought pluto was demoted because it was tiny. And if we called THAT a planet, we'd also have to label a whole load of tiny orbiters planets as well.

The only size criteria is that it has to be large enough that gravity shapes it into a sphere (which it does). As far as I know, the only criteria it didn't meet was the "clearing the orbit" one.
 

TechBoyJK

Lifer
Oct 17, 2002
16,699
60
91
The only size criteria is that it has to be large enough that gravity shapes it into a sphere (which it does). As far as I know, the only criteria it didn't meet was the "clearing the orbit" one.

plus it meant if pluto was a planet there likely several dozen other similar bodies in the Kieper Belt that would then need to be added as planets.

Pluto is a planet? It means we have like 30 planets in our solar system.
 
Dec 10, 2005
29,112
14,479
136
Ten years later, and we don't seem to have any more info than this article published by NASA. So this is really old news. Called the tenth planet, probably because its discovery happened before Pluto was downgraded.

http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/newplanet-072905.html
I'm pretty sure that press release is for a different object:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eris_(dwarf_planet)
Eris was discovered in January 2005...
Because Eris appeared to be larger than Pluto, NASA initially described it as the Solar System's tenth planet.
Plus, it has a citation to the press release you linked (though, the original link is faulty).
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,082
136
plus it meant if pluto was a planet there likely several dozen other similar bodies in the Kieper Belt that would then need to be added as planets.

Pluto is a planet? It means we have like 30 planets in our solar system.

Umm, yeah, thats kinda what I said.
So, yeah.