• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Scientists create cuddle hormone for men.

Analog

Lifer
Scientists have finally worked out what women really want. They have created a spray that makes men more caring, affectionate and in tune with others' feelings. Just a puff or two and even the most macho of males is as sensitive as a woman, they claim. The spray is based on oxytocin - a hormone naturally made in the body and involved in sex, sexual attraction, trust and confidence. It is released into the blood during labour - triggering the production of breast milk - and floods the brain during breastfeeding, helping mother and baby bond. In spray form, it seems that the so-called 'cuddle chemical' can make a man feel like a woman. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...fectionate-using-cuddle-hormone-oxytocin.html
 
Cool, I wonder if I'd produce milk. That could be useful for late night cereal meals when I'm out of milk :^D
 
Men naturally produce oxytocin on their own already. Dunno what the point of the spray would be.

I take it you didn't read the article.

Did you also forget there is estrogen in the male body?

Levels of specific hormones are the large factor, as... if there are any hormones one gender has the other does not, I cannot recall them at this time.
 
If it make me want to cuddle, then I'd be enjoying it right? So whats the problem? You're both happy.
 
If it make me want to cuddle, then I'd be enjoying it right? So whats the problem? You're both happy.

Well the curiosity is in how long the effects are, and whether there are any lasting personality impacts.

Regardless of what one believes is right, or their opinion on gender roles in the social world, a man tends to need some of those male traits to perform successfully as a man in the social environment.

What I mean is, take the example they provided: building things, fixing things, in general doing "manly" things.
Because many women will call on these men to do that. It's not a matter of men learning to act a certain way, or of women learning to become a certain way, but rather... it's in our genetics, in our brain.
I've already said I'm split-brained. Between simple tests online, and general acknowledgment of how I think and view things, whether it's scientifically accurate or not, I accept I have a relatively evenly-split male/female brain.
It's a fact those two types of brain-constructs exist, and a fact many have a mix to some degree of both types.

You absolutely, at this point in time, cannot alter your brain structure. Because of that, everyone is going to have a calling of sorts, that largely determines how they view things and how they behave. Behavior can be shaped, to some degree, but their natural drive will forever linger in their head somewhere - but it's the decision-making center that helps us understand whether actions we take, positive or negative, will be accepted by society.

BTW: don't chastise me for this post, society is society and these things are just natural and social facts. There are, will always be, and should be, people of both genders that mix things up a bit: the more technical/"handy"/craft-oriented female, the more empathic male. Nothing socially wrong with that imho.

My point is: what makes someone happy in small amounts, is not always a good idea to always surround yourself with.

Me? If this kind of spray acts kind of like a drug, where the effects are temporary and there are no lasting side-effects personality-wise, I'd be down for it when sharing time with an SO; I, however, wouldn't want it effecting me at all when not around the SO. Nor would I want it effecting me every single moment I'm around an SO.

IMHO, relationships are best when, most of the time, the personality characteristics are not extremely similar. Each party in the relationship should have a strength the other does not, as it makes it more of an equal pair in the end. The more male-brained person will need the more female-brained person for certain things, and the reverse is equally true.
Interests, personality quirks, behaviors... those can be similar, but the fundamental root of the natural drive would ideally not be the same.

I'm no relationship counselor, so my opinion likely has no weight. I'm just looking at it from a natural perspective. 😉
 
So thats what they were doing with the vials of my blood they take nearly every time I go to my doctor. 🙁

/needs someone to cuddle with. 🙁
 
Gays do not feel like women...

they may not "feel" like women, but the characteristic homosexuals are very much feminine in every way, including the gender personality. Things they the typical female shows, empathy, the way they handle emotions (which men handle to, but differently), and other things, the stereotypical homosexual shows them just the same.

Now, the more "normal" male homosexuals, the ones that still play sports, aren't afraid of injury while working with machinery (let's call this the lumberjack homosexual)... no, they don't demonstrate those characteristics. 😛

Reverse those two groups, and that shows the female side of homosexuality. Lumberjack females are a strange bunch. 😀
 
Back
Top