Originally posted by: Genx87
But but but the people in America are the sheeps.
Not the Germans who buy into anti-war rhetoric that makes them forget about the 12% unemployment rates and stagnant ecnomy.
If this guy wins based on a campaign of ripping on America, lmao at the Germans.
The economy and problems with reforms actually were two of the reasons which led to the pre-term elections.
For those interested: The election campaign was brief and boring. Most posters just showed the portraits of the party leaders and chancelor candidates. The rest were neutral photos from families and babies (two parties were caught using material from gettyimages, haha).
Politicians often play the foreign policy card when in trouble or election campaigns. Schroeder had success three years ago and I thought he would try it again. However foreign policy wasn't that important in his campaign (I've heard only now from this poster and tomorrow is the election date). I doubt that the Germans will elect him for foreign policy merits.
The claim that the German government prevented Germans dying in Iraq is speculative... Just because the opposition sympathized with OIF doesn't mean that they would've supported it with German soldiers.
Again, Iraq wasn't a big topic in the election campaigns; I've only found it mentioned twice on the website of Schroeder's party: here (at the bottom) and here (the last poster says: "For peace. Against blind following").
The rumor that the FDP could join the SPD and the Greens for a new coalition is very unlikely. A three party coalition would be a pain in the neck of the new chancelor. In my opinion, either the entire opposition (FDP and CDU) takes over, or SPD and the CDU will form a "Big Coalition" (called so because they are the biggest parties, traditionally belonging to contrasting wings of the political spectrum). If the recently founded "New Left" party makes enough votes, Schroeder could let it join the present SPD-Green coalition. But New Left basically are dinosaurs with few concepts, fishing for votes of the unsatisfied. I hope they aren't going to join a coalition (or even to pass the 5% hurdle). Ideologically speaking, the Big Coalition would be the best solution, but the last time this happened the coalition partners blocked each other and it was unsatisfying. So I'm hoping for the opposition to take over, with a strong minor partner (the FDP).
In my opinion the coffin poster is politically cheap and misleading to some degree, too. It's not gentleman-like behavior to politicise on the back of dead soldiers. But then I wonder again if some Americans are overly sensible to the photo because the Bush Administration tries to cover this photographs from the public eye (Bush not coming to funerals and the military base where the corpses arrive being a restricted area for journalists come to mind).
Has somebody a link to the poster in question?
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
It's really sickening how almost all of the Europeans on this forum use the 'You must live here to criticize here' argument...talk about being extremely hypocritical!
We can falsificate every "funny fact" Mr. Europhobe posts about our continent but when it comes down to claims about European mentalities and racism, first-hand experience would be in order.
It's sickening how some users are forgiving about CanOWorms learning resistance. Well I guess Pedro69 should scan and upload his passport or what...? How do I prove there never was a poster of blacks eating white babies? Ah well, CanOWorms could provide us a link... won't happen.