SC GOP Activist Posts Remark Disparaging First Lady

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,831
4,934
136
Originally posted by: Genx87
Since when did Humans gain an extra chromosome?

Ignore him; he's flinging feces. ;)


E.G. cows, guinea pigs and goldfish have more chromosomes than humans...it doesn't make them our genetic superiors.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: Genx87
Since when did Humans gain an extra chromosome?

Ignore him; he's flinging feces. ;)


E.G. cows, guinea pigs and goldfish have more chromosomes than humans...it doesn't make them our genetic superiors.

I find it amusing Hare's have the same Chromosome count as us :D

 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: Paddington
Is it OK for me to describe Michelle's Texas sized ass as being as wide as a Buick? I just want to make sure that's not racist. I noticed this when she was visiting Europe and took up as much real estate as 4 or 5 Sarkozy's.

It might make you a boor, shallow, a cad, rude, unchivalrous, trailer-trash culture, misogynistic, insensitive, blind - but I don't see it as racist. Hope you are relieved.

Craig isn't that a bit harsh? Michelle does have large hips and butt. Wasn't Hillary the butt (no pun intended) of similar jokes? Would you say the same about a woman who points out a guys bald head, beer belly, etc?

FWIW, the comment by Depass is clearly racist and he deserves the response he's getting. As far as the pic of Obama with the other presidents - someone sent me that this morning and I'll admit I laughed when I saw it.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: Patranus
Originally posted by: GroundedSailor
Originally posted by: Patranus
Do a google search for (Bush Monkey) and see how many hits comes up.

Once again. Bush Monkey is a politician. His wife is not. Disparage Obama - as he is a politician. His wife is not and making disparaging remarks about her with racial overtones is below crass.

So you are the thought police? You knew that the person was intentionally trying to be racist and not simple "disparaging remarks"?

I see....

First off, the first lady puts her self out there, politically, so she is fair game. Period. I guess you support the firing of Letterman for his comments regarding Palins 14-year-old daughter?

Secondly, what is it, did we evolve from monkeys or not? Be consistent. Did evolution happen or not? Yes or no.

Quoted for further proof you're both dishonest, stupid, and trolling.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: Paddington
Is it OK for me to describe Michelle's Texas sized ass as being as wide as a Buick? I just want to make sure that's not racist. I noticed this when she was visiting Europe and took up as much real estate as 4 or 5 Sarkozy's.

It might make you a boor, shallow, a cad, rude, unchivalrous, trailer-trash culture, misogynistic, insensitive, blind - but I don't see it as racist. Hope you are relieved.

Craig isn't that a bit harsh? Michelle does have large hips and butt. Wasn't Hillary the butt (no pun intended) of similar jokes? Would you say the same about a woman who points out a guys bald head, beer belly, etc?

FWIW, the comment by Depass is clearly racist and he deserves the response he's getting. As far as the pic of Obama with the other presidents - someone sent me that this morning and I'll admit I laughed when I saw it.

Yes, it is harsh - my comment should not be read as saying he is those things, it's saying that those are things that his comment might lead him to be accused of, depending on contaxt, etc., as I'm answering the question about whether the comment is *racist*, and saying IMO, it's not. But yes, if it were read as calling him those things, it would be too harsh.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Patranus
did we evolve from monkeys or not? Be consistent. Did evolution happen or not? Yes or no.
I'm thinking that you and your ilk did but the rest of us didn't and yes I believe in Evolution.

Is that why your knuckles still drag when you walk? :evil:
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: CU
Originally posted by: Craig234
No. It's racist because of the history making it racist, and the person choosing to say it given that history.

Obviously, if someone had lived in a cave since birth and didn't know the history, they wouoldn't know not to say it; they could then be told how big an oops it was, and say 'sorry, didn't know'. But go find me a public official who is unaware of the black-Simian racism history, that it's a racist thing to say.

You are trying to blame the victim. You are being obtuse.

I tire of the people who pull this crap - it's so often 14 year olds explaining how 'i love you' means a cigarette in England, so it's ok to say ha ha ha. Idiocy.

I speak to you as a reasonable person - you come back too many times with BS blaming the victim here, and that can change.

I agree it is racist because of history, but you said it would be racist until the reference meant nothing. For it to not mean something the people being offended by it must not let it mean something or offend them thus they are part of the problem. The offended need to stop taking things in the worst way and people saying things should assume people will take things in the worst way. That way if either side makes a mistake it should not offend anyone.

My comment was 'until the reference means nothing' because the racism has become forgotten from lack of use - not 'means nothing' because the targets 'ignore it'.

You are blaming the victim there. How about I insult your mother, and then say you are part of the problem for saying it's offensive, when you could just ignore it?

Are you really partly in the wrong there? No. You could ignore it, but you are not wrong to object.

You do seem very reasonable, and I appreciate that. But how many times do I came back blaming the victim here? I don't really even post that much here.

Thanks; I don't see you as unreasonable, rather, I know I've had times when something I thought was 'harmless' I came to see as 'oh, that's offensive'.

We're just exchanging views on our view of this situation. I appreciate your civilness.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: Atreus21

Good heavens. How is it we rule the world?

It's temporary.

The discovery of beer led to the humans' out-breeding apes, who are not attractive, and without the aid of beer, breed much less.

The next key issue was the invention of gunpowder. The apes have a saying, 'put a million humans in front oft a typewriter, and they'll invent gunpowder'. The breeding paid off.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,662
31,665
136
Originally posted by: Patranus
Do a google search for (Bush Monkey) and see how many hits comes up.

Need explination? Call a black person a cracker, means nothing.
 

CU

Platinum Member
Aug 14, 2000
2,415
51
91
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: CU
Originally posted by: Craig234
No. It's racist because of the history making it racist, and the person choosing to say it given that history.

Obviously, if someone had lived in a cave since birth and didn't know the history, they wouoldn't know not to say it; they could then be told how big an oops it was, and say 'sorry, didn't know'. But go find me a public official who is unaware of the black-Simian racism history, that it's a racist thing to say.

You are trying to blame the victim. You are being obtuse.

I tire of the people who pull this crap - it's so often 14 year olds explaining how 'i love you' means a cigarette in England, so it's ok to say ha ha ha. Idiocy.

I speak to you as a reasonable person - you come back too many times with BS blaming the victim here, and that can change.

I agree it is racist because of history, but you said it would be racist until the reference meant nothing. For it to not mean something the people being offended by it must not let it mean something or offend them thus they are part of the problem. The offended need to stop taking things in the worst way and people saying things should assume people will take things in the worst way. That way if either side makes a mistake it should not offend anyone.

My comment was 'until the reference means nothing' because the racism has become forgotten from lack of use - not 'means nothing' because the targets 'ignore it'.

You are blaming the victim there. How about I insult your mother, and then say you are part of the problem for saying it's offensive, when you could just ignore it?

Are you really partly in the wrong there? No. You could ignore it, but you are not wrong to object.

"Forgotten from lack of use" does clarify that more, and I see your point that would allow a statement like what was made to not be racist because no one would remember how to take it in a racist way. I do however believe this will take a very long time to happen. I think a quicker way would be for people to stop taking things in a racist unless that is the only absolute way to take it. Make the offender come out and use a real insult or admit to saying it to be racist. Although by the time you convinced the world to do that "Forgotten from lack of use" would have already worked. LOL. So, I guess it is here to stay and we all better watch what we say.

Depending on the what you said about my mother it may be my fault. If you called her fat, and she really was then it is partly my fault. Because if that is all you said then I really should only be offended by it if I assume you were trying to say it as an insult, and without further context clues that would be wrong. But if you called her a fat b****, then it would not be my fault because I don't see how that could be taken anyway besides and insult.

As for what was said about the First Lady it was a one sentence post with no context except for him saying later it was about making fun of her evolution speech. And even with the later context he added a lot of people still think he said it as a racist comment. I just don't see why people look for the worst way to take things. Call me naive, but I try to look for the good in everyone and everything.



 

RKDaley

Senior member
Oct 27, 2007
392
0
0
Originally posted by: CU
As for what was said about the First Lady it was a one sentence post with no context except for him saying later it was about making fun of her evolution speech.

What evolution speech?
Do you happen to have a link to it?
 

CU

Platinum Member
Aug 14, 2000
2,415
51
91
I just heard the end of the news story on TV a few mornings ago and they said the comment was made because of her evolution speech. I don't have a link.
 

RKDaley

Senior member
Oct 27, 2007
392
0
0
Originally posted by: CU
I just heard the end of the news story on TV a few mornings ago and they said the comment was made because of her evolution speech. I don't have a link.

Yes, I too had heard the excuse given of some speech, but it was unsubstantiated. I also did a search for the it but was unable to find it. That was why I was hoping you'd have a link to it.

I'm starting to believe this is another instance of the 'Whitey Tape".

 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,897
3,860
136
Originally posted by: CU
I just heard the end of the news story on TV a few mornings ago and they said the comment was made because of her evolution speech. I don't have a link.

So that guy is saying he doesn't believe advantageous traits can be passed on to descendants? I guess he's only an ignoramus rather than a racist. What a relief.
 

CU

Platinum Member
Aug 14, 2000
2,415
51
91
Originally posted by: RKDaley
Originally posted by: CU
I just heard the end of the news story on TV a few mornings ago and they said the comment was made because of her evolution speech. I don't have a link.

Yes, I too had heard the excuse given of some speech, but it was unsubstantiated. I also did a search for the it but was unable to find it. That was why I was hoping you'd have a link to it.

I'm starting to believe this is another instance of the 'Whitey Tape".

I just did a quick search also and didn't find a real quote. So, without that it is rather hard to not take it as racist. If he has never said or done anything racist before, maybe he just mis-heard her or something. I don't know.

What is the "Whitey Tape"?
 

CU

Platinum Member
Aug 14, 2000
2,415
51
91
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: CU
I just heard the end of the news story on TV a few mornings ago and they said the comment was made because of her evolution speech. I don't have a link.

So that guy is saying he doesn't believe advantageous traits can be passed on to descendants? I guess he's only an ignoramus rather than a racist. What a relief.

So, if he doesn't believe in evolution but instead believes in divine intervention, then he is an ignoramus. I am sure that some very smart people don't believe in evolution. One area does not make you an ignoramus. Although the guy could be as stupid as a rock for all I know. He is a politician after all.
 

WHAMPOM

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
7,628
183
106
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Originally posted by: Patranus
Originally posted by: GroundedSailor
Originally posted by: Patranus
Do a google search for (Bush Monkey) and see how many hits comes up.

Once again. Bush Monkey is a politician. His wife is not. Disparage Obama - as he is a politician. His wife is not and making disparaging remarks about her with racial overtones is below crass.

So you are the thought police? You knew that the person was intentionally trying to be racist and not simple "disparaging remarks"?

I see....

First off, the first lady puts her self out there, politically, so she is fair game. Period. I guess you support the firing of Letterman for his comments regarding Palins 14-year-old daughter?

Secondly, what is it, did we evolve from monkeys or not? Be consistent. Did evolution happen or not? Yes or no.

No, apes, monkeys, humans descend from a common ancestor. Apes ars actually further evolved then humans and found to have more genetic diversity in a single group of apes then the entire human race does. Apes also have the full set of 48 chromosomes unlike humans 47 due to inbreeding damage after a near extinction.

Good heavens. How is it we rule the world?

We don't, insects rule the world.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: CU
So, if he doesn't believe in evolution but instead believes in divine intervention, then he is an ignoramus.

1000 years ago when people thought the earth looked like a frisbee, no. Today? Yeppers. Even the pope acknowledged no contradiction exists between faith in god and evolution, it's time to let this one go. It's on par with arguing that Apollo's chariot drags the sun across the sky each day.
 

wwswimming

Banned
Jan 21, 2006
3,695
1
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
You guys call and continue to call GWB a bubble-Chimp. Get over it, it was a funny jab at evolutionist.

yes, Bush 43 was & is the Bubble Chimp.

as far as this SC GOP guy - so what ?
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: CU
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: CU
Originally posted by: Craig234
No. It's racist because of the history making it racist, and the person choosing to say it given that history.

Obviously, if someone had lived in a cave since birth and didn't know the history, they wouoldn't know not to say it; they could then be told how big an oops it was, and say 'sorry, didn't know'. But go find me a public official who is unaware of the black-Simian racism history, that it's a racist thing to say.

You are trying to blame the victim. You are being obtuse.

I tire of the people who pull this crap - it's so often 14 year olds explaining how 'i love you' means a cigarette in England, so it's ok to say ha ha ha. Idiocy.

I speak to you as a reasonable person - you come back too many times with BS blaming the victim here, and that can change.

I agree it is racist because of history, but you said it would be racist until the reference meant nothing. For it to not mean something the people being offended by it must not let it mean something or offend them thus they are part of the problem. The offended need to stop taking things in the worst way and people saying things should assume people will take things in the worst way. That way if either side makes a mistake it should not offend anyone.

My comment was 'until the reference means nothing' because the racism has become forgotten from lack of use - not 'means nothing' because the targets 'ignore it'.

You are blaming the victim there. How about I insult your mother, and then say you are part of the problem for saying it's offensive, when you could just ignore it?

Are you really partly in the wrong there? No. You could ignore it, but you are not wrong to object.

"Forgotten from lack of use" does clarify that more, and I see your point that would allow a statement like what was made to not be racist because no one would remember how to take it in a racist way. I do however believe this will take a very long time to happen. I think a quicker way would be for people to stop taking things in a racist unless that is the only absolute way to take it. Make the offender come out and use a real insult or admit to saying it to be racist. Although by the time you convinced the world to do that "Forgotten from lack of use" would have already worked. LOL. So, I guess it is here to stay and we all better watch what we say.

Thanks for this reasonable response. I'd just add I'm not sure you appreciate that your desired standard would leave a lot of racist innuendo going on.

14 year olds who love to say 'i love you' and defend it by saying 'maybe they only a mean a cigarette in England' would rejoice with your new lax policy.

Depending on the what you said about my mother it may be my fault. If you called her fat, and she really was then it is partly my fault. Because if that is all you said then I really should only be offended by it if I assume you were trying to say it as an insult, and without further context clues that would be wrong. But if you called her a fat b****, then it would not be my fault because I don't see how that could be taken anyway besides and insult.

I'm talking, though, about racism, not defensible racial statements. The reference to the 'blacks and monkeys' racism is a problem, I'm not talking about someone saying, in a responsible context, 'African Americans commit a disprortionate percentage of crimes',which is analagous to your mother actually being overweight. (Not that it's right to go around insulting based on weight, and if someone did say that, it's probaly at attack aimed at you, not your mother).

As for what was said about the First Lady it was a one sentence post with no context except for him saying later it was about making fun of her evolution speech. And even with the later context he added a lot of people still think he said it as a racist comment. I just don't see why people look for the worst way to take things. Call me naive, but I try to look for the good in everyone and everything.

I can even accept that he might be telling the truth, but the point is, that because of the history, it's still wrong.

Maybe an anecdote will help (true story). A young man saw a news story about a man who had been killed while working on his car, and he used a torch to open the gas tank - it exploded. This young man and his brother laughed hysterically at the idiocy of the man doing that. Not long after, they had a visitor - the mother of the man who was killed, who turned out to know his parents, and he got to see their grief, and realized what an ass he'd been to laugh as he did. Think he'd say to her 'that's sad and all, but isn't the idiocy funny?'

The fact is, if Michelle Obama were white, he could probably be ok with the joke; on that issue, there's a different standard, because the history is different for blacks.

I like that you see good in situations and give the benefit of the doubt, but that doesn't make it ok to open the door for racists to demand their insinuations be allowed.

As I said before, the right response is for the guy to explain that he didn't mean it as racist, say sorry now that he realizes it.

Kind of like Obama did on his 'special olympics' gaffe when he only meant to make himself the tarkget of the joke, but actually accidentally made fun of people with disabilites.