• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

SBD

Status
Not open for further replies.
CHICAGO (Reuters) ? A study using new imaging technology found "silent" heart attacks may be far more common, and more deadly, than suspected, U.S. researchers said Friday. Some studies estimate that these often painless heart attacks, also known as unrecognized myocardial infarctions, affect 200,000 people in the United States each year. But Dr. Han Kim of Duke University in North Carolina suspects the numbers may be far higher. "No one has fully understood how often these heart attacks occur and what they mean, in terms of prognosis," Kim, whose study will appear next week in the Public Library of Science journal PLoS Medicine, said in a statement. Doctors usually can tell whether a patient has had a recent heart attack by looking for signature changes on a test of the heart's electrical activity called an electrocardiogram and by checking for certain enzymes in the blood. For a heart attack that might have occurred in the past, doctors look for changes on an electrocardiogram called a Q-wave, a marker for damaged tissue. But not all silent heart attacks result in Q-waves. "Those are the ones we haven't been able to count because we've never had a good way to document them," Kim said. To spot these, Kim and colleagues used a new type of magnetic resonance imaging technology called delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance, which is especially adept at finding damaged heart tissue. They studied 185 patients with coronary artery disease but no record of heart attacks who were scheduled to have a test to look for possible blockages in their heart arteries. They found that 35 percent of the patients had evidence of a prior heart attack. And they found that these so-called non-Q-wave heart attacks were three times more common than silent heart attacks with Q-waves. They also found that after two years of follow up, people who had suffered a silent, non-Q-wave heart attack had an 11-fold higher risk of death from any cause and a 17-fold higher risk of death due to heart problems, when compared to patients who did not have any heart damage. Kim said currently people who have had silent heart attacks are treated like other patients with heart disease. But given the findings, he said new studies should look at the best way to care for these patients. Heart disease is the No. 1 cause of death in the United States, followed by cancer and stroke. The article an be found at http://www.plosmedicine.org/ar...1/journal.pmed.1000060
 
What's the point in knowing about them if you won't feel it when it happens?

- didn't read the whole article.
 
Originally posted by: barfo
What's the point in knowing about them if you won't feel it when it happens?

- didn't read the whole article.

I guess if you go for a routine physical, the tests are done, and Dr.'s see you've had "silent heart attacks", you can get on meds before the "big one" hits.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top