Saw this question on r/atheism today.

Page 56 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
31,111
2,725
126
I can certainly understand MeowKat's position here, that Dawkins is much worse than the Pope.

I mean, all Ratzinger did was cover up and facilitate child rape.

Dawkins is an atheist!

Put Dicks life accomplishments on a scale with Pope Benedict's and the clear winner is the Pope. Dick is not even worth mentioning except for his exaggerated sense of self.

I think that ship sailed when he suggested that we have to enforce the Ten Commandments in order to have "justice".

If you believe there is no God, then you leave justice to human hands with all its flaws. In some cases the innocent are jailed for decades but DNA sets them free. God sees and knows everything. Evil will be punished either now or in the afterlife for those that got away w/o prosecution and never sought forgiveness.

I also think that if someone has done wrong on Earth....repented and made reparations to victims....then all they could suffer is an Earthly punishment. But God, seeing their contriteness and consideration for victims, can forgive them.
 
Last edited:

OCNewbie

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2000
7,596
25
81
God sees and knows everything. Evil will be punished either now or in the afterlife for those that got away w/o prosecution and never sought forgiveness.

I also think that if someone has done wrong on Earth....repented and made reparations to victims....then all they could suffer is an Earthly punishment. But God, seeing their contriteness and consideration for victims, can forgive them.

brainwash.png
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
31,111
2,725
126
Please don't tell me you believe this, please.

I think it's safe to say that with all the obviously physically and mentally ill people that were "turned around" after attempting to come on stage, that this guys was/is a straight up fraud.

I can tell you this -- Jesus' power was from God as he healed even paralyzed people...this Hinn fellow, as far as I know, refused to even touch such ones on camera.

:hmm:

There are some people who think preacher X holds the way to salvation and can perform the miracle of healing. If that person does believe in God and preacher X did in fact lead that person to a better life, then who am I to judge or question that?

I also mentioned that certain people abuse peoples faith in God to gain personal glory/wealth. Hinn seemed to be this type of person so the accounts of fraud are probably accurate as he sought those things.

As I said before God sent us here to help each other if we can. He also gave some of us gifts to help each other which include:

http://www.ewtn.com/library/montfort/Handbook/Charism.htm

" 3. Exceptional charisms:
a. The charism of prophecy,
b. The charism of discernment,
c. The charism of healing,
d. Other charisms,
e. Other supernatural phenomena.
"

I know of them because Ive experienced them in my life, including prophecy. I too was even healed by someone who was not even a priest / pastor. Just a normal person with the gift of healing. When I was 8 years old I fell off some poorly designed playground equipment and broke my arm. The doctor said I had a hairline fracture and said that I might wind up having one arm longer than the other. The gave me a sling but otherwise not much else was done. This person was able to help repair the bone. We all prayed and she did massage my arm with oil that had been blessed by the church (Holy Oil). We offered her just a token $5 and she refused even that. She didnt look like she had two dimes to rub together either.

After a few days I could move my arm with no pain. We went back to the doctor to be sure and he said it had completely healed.

How can I not have faith in God?
 

WHAMPOM

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
7,628
183
106
Put Dicks life accomplishments on a scale with Pope Benedict's and the clear winner is the Pope. Dick is not even worth mentioning except for his exaggerated sense of self.



Why would you say that?



If you believe their is no God, then you leave justice to human hands with all its flaws. In some cases the innocent are jailed for decades but DNA sets them free. God sees and knows everything. Evil will be punished either now or in the afterlife for those that got away w/o prosecution and never sought forgiveness.

I also think that if someone has done wrong on Earth....repented and made reparations to victims....then all they could suffer is an Earthly punishment. But God, seeing their contriteness and consideration for victims, can forgive them.

All I see is a great excuse for not doing anything about the wrongs in this world in your life time. Justice is in human hands, get it done!
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
31,111
2,725
126
If you think my criticism of Dawkins was too strong, that it was unfair to compare him to Westboro, I understand that. Especially if you think his criticisms of anyone who believes in God or of the Catholic church are worthwhile.

Ill admit when I watch him or Maher on Youtube I do get mad. I guess I could tone it down, however. :oops:
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
If you think my criticism of Dawkins was too strong, that it was unfair to compare him to Westboro, I understand that. Especially if you think his criticisms of anyone who believes in God or of the Catholic church are worthwhile.

Ill admit when I watch him or Maher on Youtube I do get mad. I guess I could tone it down, however. :oops:

I don't care about Dawkins' criticisms, I just think comparing him to Westboro is 100% factually wrong.

Most people, if you ask, have no idea who Richard Dawkins is. Most people do, however, know about Westboro Baptist Church and can readily list some of the despicable things they've said and done.

Dawkins hasn't had groups of people line up to separate him from funerals or drown out what he's saying.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,823
6,780
126
M: This is a form of self flattery. I have been running around cooking a beef stir fry and paying bills so I will have some time to play a game later and naturally help you see what you so far are unable to. I pop in, as it were, from the dark side of the Moon, and surprise you with fact you don't understand and the minute I announce some fact like this, I suddenly become angry. Hehehe I have long and extensive experience with this kind of anger.

CK: If you're not angry, then why do you keep using angry words? While accusing me of being angry, when I do not?

Does this make any sort of sense to you? It does not to me, and probably not to anyone else here either.

M: You should see by now that there is an answer to every point of view you have from inside your prison but that the answer is then seen from inside that prison creating a new question. You think you can judge what is sense and what is not. You have been programmed to think you can reason out the truth while lacking the sense to do so and I have been programmed to be aware that I will try to do that. When I first encountered a teaching that explained to me my prison, that concealed prejudice called ego, barred my way, I inclined in the direction of listening. I turned my back on the notion that I knew something about sense and listened to the wisdom of idiots, not the sensible people that so dominate here. This has made me indifferent to folk who say I don't make sense and or that most might not agree with mu view. That is for folk who are looking for validation from the outside.
------------
M: We are born perfect and in a state of oneness, no ego self to divide us from feeling we are everything that there is. We are born in a God state but we can have it taken away because we do not have consciousness that has separated from God and returned. We were born with an infinite potential to love and were killed. It is the programming that separated us from God, the acquisition of language and the inculcation of emotion into words, the belief there is good and evil and then that happy day when we were told we are worthless, that we are evil, etc, the day we rejected our true self. The day we recover that state of oneness is the day we remember God.

M: Sorry, but every bit of that pseudo-mystical hokum is itself programming.

Babies are born as blank slates. They get taught silly nonsense about gods and "consciousness that has separated from God" and all the similar rot.

M: Ah crap, not the tabula rasa shit. We were born with the most complex computing device in the known universe right between our ears to be limited from day one by arrogant opinions. The computer is hard wired, as a human brain, at the gross level, and
can run an infinite number of programs. For thousands of years folk who have awakened to some of it's higher potentials have been exploring and refining its capabilities. It has been known for quite some time now that at whatever capacity a person may be running, he or she always feels certain that their level is the best there is.

For these reasons those who experience states that transcend ordinary awareness, maybe a state of universal love, have worked to provide knowledge for those who feel something is missing, that their brains aren't functioning up to speed. The capacity aches to be used.

M: Yes but deprogrammed from belief in a bridge. A deprogrammed atheist is a Knower of God.

CK: So now you're back to pretending that atheism is a religion. It's not.

Atheists, by definition, are not programmed. They are open to assessing and evaluating anything, provided it is supported by evidence and reasoning.

The "God" you think you "Know" is a fabrication of your own desires.

M: Moonbeam by definition is God. Now please pay more attention. A pig is a bird. Atheists are programmed. Webster if full of shit.
----------
M: I am just such an atheist.

Of course you are.

M: Hehehe, Most definitely.
-------
The question, again, is, could there be a state, one I call oneness, in which one knows the real meaning of God, one for which there may be electrical evidence of in brain scans, or one that releases this or that chemical, but which can be know as an experience only by having it?
----------
Could there be such a state? Sure, show me the evidence.
-----------
Better yet, I will give you it in the form of a story, the first in the Wisdom of the Idiots, but when I finish this.

CK: I'm not going to take your word for it, nor the word of any other religious/mystic types, none of whom can seem to agree on what this alleged "state" even is.

M: I told you that you fear being deceived. What you seem not to notice is that I am not trying to prove anything. Truth can't be given away. I am trying to be sure that if there is anything in you that hungers or is genuinely curious, that I will have done all I can to help. I try to do what I can to combat self deception and the deceived deceiving others. I know you are afraid. I know something about the pain of dying to belief.
----
CK: Again, another mischaracterization. Most atheists do not ever claim to be "free from logical error". They are open to reassessing their views based on emergent evidence and reasoning.

M: I've noticed.

Then why did you make your previous comment?

M: As always. The assumption that one has the tools and data to reason properly.

But without those assumptions, you may ask what there is. Without those assumptions there is humility and a disinclination to believe in ones poor judgment.
------
M: No I told you what you need and instead of thinking about it you tried to turn it back on me. You, in your arrogance simply spit on the advise.

CK: Actually, I did think about it. And I quickly realized that it was self-contradictory.

I didn't spit on the advice. It spit on itself, by decrying arrogance while at the same time engaging in perhaps the greatest form of arrogance possible.

M: Yes you came instantly to the assumptions you hold that it is me and not you who is arrogant. That's fine by me. What I do is study self deception. I work on deprogramming. I arrogantly alerted you to the fact that you are arrogant in your opinion. Hehe It's not everybody who is so lucky. You realize, I hope, how special you are to have gotten my attention? If I ask you to thing about something realize that I mean thing not grab all the assumptions you can get. You will always find what you are looking for. Take in. Step out of your normal habits. Consider from a different attitude.

M: I told you that you lack humility and you say I am arrogant to tell you.

CK: You told me I lack humility while expressing a profound lack of humility.

Advice that the advice-taker cannot follow himself is not likely to be of any great value, much less "truth".

M: Anybody who confronts another with his arrogance will be accused of it whether it is there or not. This is my arrogant opinion. The difference between us I think, on this matter is that I am arrogant and know it and you do not. The truth is kind of arrogant. It goes on being true regardless of what anybody thinks.
-------------
M: Then it should apply because both are religious.

CK: You've just confirmed that you do not understand atheism.

M: No I just confronted one of your assumptions that atheism is not a matter of faith and left it up to your intelligence to see what I actually said. I did not say that atheism is a faith that there are no gods. I said that atheism has faith that where there is no evidence of gods it makes sense not to believe in them. My point is that all the evidence that the religious try to supply about gods is their assumptions that gods have an existence that can be demonstrated with scientific evidence when the evidence for the existence of Truth and it's million other names is not to be had by belief or disbelief, by scientific evidence. It can only be had as the result of a transformation of consciousness, the acquisition of a state and that only by this inner journey is the truth to be found.

Where we are now is that instead of the question, does God exist, which can never be proved or disproved, we have a new question. Is there a state of consciousness that if one experiences it, all these things become clear. Is it possible that anybody can have God knowledge by means of an inner experience and is there a body of people who have experienced that state that know how to guide others? Do the millions of fingers, the millions of bridges point and lead to something real. One can only know by looking and walking. Nobody will who thinks he has already arrived. That's it.
-----
M: The problem is comes when you are what you describe and think you are not.

CK: A perfect description of what you said prior about people who think they "know" about gods.

M: I don't know what I said earlier that you refer to but hope what I just said helps.
---------
M: Certainty accompanied by the absence of self knowledge is the issue for me.

But, as we've already established, you only have an "issue" with other people's certainty.

Yours is not to be questioned.

Funny how it always works out that way.
------------
It's not funny. It makes perfect sense. You have an need to see things this way. You are in attack and defend mode instead of listening. When I stepped into the primate lab a thousand monkeys threw shit, not knowing I came from PETA. I'm quite used to it.
 
Last edited:

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,330
126
Where is this written in any credible historical text that your mockery of religion said anything at all? :rolleyes:

So the only thing required for a religion is a really old book? How old does the book have to be? Is there a minimum size or is the age the only condition?
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,330
126
Well, the two books of the Bible have survived thousands of years. That FSM is a modern day invention created by some extremists as a joke. To answer your question I have believed in the credibility of the New Testament as the revelation of God since I was old enough to read it. Having a foundation in faith allowed me to do so. Biblical historians have done much to validate it.

Do you find it at least a tad bit interesting that the only reason you believe in the New Testament is geography? If you were born in the ME you would be a devout muslim, other places you would perhaps be a Buddhist or some other religion.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,823
6,780
126
The Fruit of Heaven from the Wisdom of Idiots:

There was once a woman who had heard of the Fruit of Heaven. She coveted it.
She asked a certain dervish whom we shall call Sabar:
"How can I find this fruit, so that I may attain to immediate knowledge?'
'You would be best advised to study with me,' said the dervish. 'But if you will not do so, you will have to travel resolutely and at times restlessly throughout the world.'
She left him and sought another, Arif the Wise One, and then found Hakim, the Sage, then Majzub the Mad, then Alim the Scientist, and many more...
She passed thirty years in her search. Finally she came to a garden and from its branches hung the Bright Fruit of heaven.
Standing besides the tree was Sabar, the First Dervish.
'Why did you not tell me when we first met that you were the Custodian of the Fruit of Heaven?, she asked him.
'Because you would not have believed me. Besides, the Tree produces fruit only once in thirty years and thirty days.'
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,330
126
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nd92qy2ZmV0

Richard Dawkins & Ricky Gervais on Religion - Probably my most favorite video about this...

Also, This god character out the old testament is a selfish fucked up thing... anyone who believes the bible seems to forget or disregard all the shitty things he's done.. oh but the new testament changes all that... yeah it's all rubbish. People hide behind their religion to do fucked up things.

That has always bewildered me to. Evidently God fucked up the religion the first go'round and had to supplement it with basically an entirely new one at a later date. Doesn't sound very omnipotent to me.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,330
126
Calling for the arrest of the leader of a sovereign nation to sell books and generate personal fame is 'nutjobbery'. I feel sorry for Dick. Without his 3 ring circus and his extremism he has nothing else going for him.

Why is covering up felony crimes, including but not limited to child rape, ok with some of you?
 

randomrogue

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2011
5,449
0
0
So I had to google Dawkins. Never heard of him before.

Dawkins is an atheist, a vice president of the British Humanist Association, and a supporter of the Brights movement.[5] He is well known for his criticism of creationism and intelligent design. In his 1986 book The Blind Watchmaker, he argues against the watchmaker analogy, an argument for the existence of a supernatural creator based upon the complexity of living organisms. Instead, he describes evolutionary processes as analogous to a blind watchmaker. He has since written several popular science books, and makes regular television and radio appearances, predominantly discussing these topics. In his 2006 book The God Delusion, Dawkins contends that a supernatural creator almost certainly does not exist and that religious faith is a delusion—"a fixed false belief". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins#cite_note-6As of January 2010, the English-language version had sold more than two million copies and had been translated into 31 languages.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins#cite_note-7

I understand that crazy religious people can't have these books published and want him to burn in hell but why is he such a big deal and worth mentioning so many times in this thread?
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,809
6,364
126
So I had to google Dawkins. Never heard of him before.



I understand that crazy religious people can't have these books published and want him to burn in hell but why is he such a big deal and worth mentioning so many times in this thread?

He is effective.
 

Charles Kozierok

Elite Member
May 14, 2012
6,762
1
0
But, as we've already established, you only have an "issue" with other people's certainty.

Yours is not to be questioned.

Funny how it always works out that way.
------------
It's not funny. It makes perfect sense.

Yes, it does.

It's called "do as I say, not as I do", and it's quite popular among the religious/mystic crowd.

Unless your intention is to come off as the world's biggest hypocrite, you should refrain from so much preaching about the evils of arrogance and the benefits of humility while simultaneously pretending you know the "path to truth".

When you've got your own issues worked out, then maybe you can work on mine. Right now, you just come across to me (as well as many others) as an overly-inflated peddler of pseudomystical psychobabble.
 
Last edited:

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,823
6,780
126
Yes, it does.

It's called "do as I say, not as I do", and it's quite popular among the religious/mystic crowd.

Unless your intention is to come off as the world's biggest hypocrite, you should refrain from so much preaching about the evils of arrogance and the benefits of humility while simultaneously pretending you know the "path to truth".

When you've got your own issues worked out, then maybe you can work on mine. Right now, you just come across to me (as well as many others) as an overly-inflated peddler of pseudomystical psychobabble.

I thought we might work on them together. A blind man with legs can't get very far with a legless dumb man, but he can with one who can speak and see. We will require, however, some muscles for the heavy lifting. We have thousands of pounds of cabbage yet to clear from the bridge. So let us look for a suitable one, say one on which it is posted, 'keep off this bridge, oh yee who are adverse to arrogance.' You see, I knew you would be repelled by the arrogance you would see in me when I tried to explain your inner condition, a condition perfectly acceptable to me because I already knew I could expect nothing else. It is arrogance to the tyrant when his authority is challenged, all tyrants, known and unknown, or whether they know who they are. Your attempt to expose them is welcome.

I am interested in your take on my question about the morality of Atheists.
 
Last edited:

Charles Kozierok

Elite Member
May 14, 2012
6,762
1
0
You see, I knew you would be repelled by the arrogance you would see in me when I tried to explain your inner condition, a condition perfectly acceptable to me because I already knew I could expect nothing else. It is arrogance to the tyrant when his authority is challenged, all tyrants, known and unknown, or whether they know who they are. Your attempt to expose them is welcome.

Er... okay.

I am interested in your take on my question about the morality of Atheists.

Morality is a part of society, and is built and evolved when people form groups. (Animals, too.)

Religion is a construct designed to reinforce (at best) or exploit (at worst) moral concepts already acceptable to a population.
 

Charles Kozierok

Elite Member
May 14, 2012
6,762
1
0
If you believe there is no God, then you leave justice to human hands with all its flaws.

If you believe there is a god, then you also leave justice to human hands with all its flaws. Because it is humans that exercise that judgment, based on rules they claim came from gods.

The gods themselves never make their supposed rules clear.

In some cases the innocent are jailed for decades but DNA sets them free. God sees and knows everything.

DNA analysis came about as a result of scientific exploration and rationality, not religious nonsense.

When your church was in charge, their idea of justice was what happened in the Dark Ages. Your god "saw everything" while countless thousands were butchered for no reason.

Tell me. You're walking down the street and you see an old woman walking in front of you. A $20 bill falls out of her purse.

Do you grab the bill and give it back to her?

If so, do you do so because you're afraid of the judgment of your god should you decide not to do so, or do you do it because it's the right thing to do?
 

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
Morality in an atheist's world is subject to human judgement with all its shortcomings and pitfalls.

Morality in a theist's world is subject to human judgment with all its shortcomings and pitfalls... Except they make believe a magic infallible judge exists to correct human errors so they can sleep better at night.

Grow up.
 

Charles Kozierok

Elite Member
May 14, 2012
6,762
1
0
I have to admit that the fear of eternal judgment can do wonders to keep people in line who might otherwise not do so. Religion is about control, after all.

The problem is when theists assume that because their fear motivates them to do good, that a lack of that fear means atheists will not do good for other reasons.

The other problem is that the fear of eternal judgment is also used to convince people to do a lot of things that aren't good at all.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Pragmatic self-interest that is not self-centered.

It was pragmatic for Stalin to kill his own people. Heck it would be pragmatic to kill anyone who is a govt liability now. e.g. those on SS or social welfare or any kind.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
If you believe there is a god, then you also leave justice to human hands with all its flaws. Because it is humans that exercise that judgment, based on rules they claim came from gods.

The gods themselves never make their supposed rules clear.



DNA analysis came about as a result of scientific exploration and rationality, not religious nonsense.

When your church was in charge, their idea of justice was what happened in the Dark Ages. Your god "saw everything" while countless thousands were butchered for no reason.

Tell me. You're walking down the street and you see an old woman walking in front of you. A $20 bill falls out of her purse.

Do you grab the bill and give it back to her?

If so, do you do so because you're afraid of the judgment of your god should you decide not to do so, or do you do it because it's the right thing to do?

What do you mean "right thing to do" where do these right thing atmospherics tenets and attitudes come from? I don't think you are born with "right thing to do" least when I read Lord of the Flies I got that impression.