• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Saw 2 is a total piece of @##p compare to the first one...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
..and the games he made them 'play' this time were so ****** lame. i mean please....when the dude climbs into the incinirator, you could see the cable attached to the door...and i wasnt even there...i suspect that if i were climbing in id be "like wtf is this cable for..oh look it will pull the door shut if i grab this"...****** idiot.

the deal with the syringes...didn't he just get done smashing door downstairs? how about you grab a piece of tht door and use it to wade through the needles?...dumbass

and dont get me started on the damn hand trap...did these people have an IQ of 2?

piece of ****** movie....
 
Want to see something hilarous in this movie?When walbert find out the name under the padlock, the scene after where you see the police truck rush to the building, watch closely the shadows on the truck when it pass in front of the camera, you will clearly see the cameramans shooting the scene...

totally hilarous 😀
 
The first one was revolutionary and innovative. The second is still a good movie, just ruined by the first. Viewers have quickly learned what to expect, so the movie is quite terrible.
 
i just rented the second one gonna watch it tommorow

i've never seen the first one though (well not all of it) think i should watch that first?
 
Originally posted by: deepred98
i just rented the second one gonna watch it tommorow

i've never seen the first one though (well not all of it) think i should watch that first?

It depends I guess on how many hours of your life your willing to waste. 2 hours or 4
 
it is kind of like the matrix..like someoen stated the first broke ground and had a great twist..the second realy cant live up to the first..the beans have already been spilled in the first movie.
 
saw 1 was crap

meaning saw 2 is double crap

thanks for the warning, I won't even bother with it (not that I was going to after the 1st one anyway...)
 
Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
Originally posted by: joedrake
I saw it, I liked it more, actually.

You're an idiot then. Saw 2 sucked huge ass compared to the 1st.
How so? Saw 1 was pretty much in that one damn bathroom the whole time.. so predictable, too. Refresh my memory?
 
Originally posted by: Nik
The first one was revolutionary and innovative. The second is still a good movie, just ruined by the first. Viewers have quickly learned what to expect, so the movie is quite terrible.

Contradict much 😕 😀
 
Geez I've only watched the 2nd one, yet everyone talks about how good the 1st one is compared to the sequel.
 
[/i]behind the scenes summary[/i]

Director: Guys, we have to release this movie next month, hows the work coming along?
Acting Coach: I don't feel like working this month...
Director: Ok, cool. Someone add some more blood too our budget to make up for the acting.

Writer: I didn't get a chance to finish the last 2/3 of the script
Director: Ok, cool. Just add some more traps and we'll wing it between mutilation scenes.

Prop manager: We don't have props
Director: Ok, cool. We'll just use the same room over, and put a hole in it and fill it with needles.

Writer: I forgot to do character development.
Director: Ok, cool. Lets just borrow character development from "The Wedding Planner"

Producer: I think we're ready to release.
 
Saw II was pretty darn good. It's hard for it to live up to the first though, because in that one you weren't expecting a twist at the end. In this one you are, so you're less surprised by it.
 
Back
Top