Saudi Hospitals Are Asked to Maim Man as Punishment

GroundedSailor

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,502
0
76
link
Saudi Hospitals Are Asked to Maim Man as Punishment
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

CAIRO (AP) — A Saudi Arabian judge has asked several hospitals in the country whether they could damage a man’s spinal cord as punishment for his attacking another man with a cleaver and paralyzing him, the brother of the victim said Thursday.

The victim, Abdul-Aziz al-Mutairi, 22, was left paralyzed after a fight more than two years ago and subsequently lost a foot. Mr. Mutairi asked a judge in northwestern Tabuk Province to impose an equivalent punishment on his attacker under Islamic law, his brother Khaled al-Mutairi said by telephone from the province.

Khaled al-Mutairi said that one of the hospitals, in Tabuk, said that it was possible to damage the spinal cord, but that the operation would have to be done at a more specialized facility.

Saudi newspapers reported that a second hospital, in the capital, Riyadh, declined, saying it could not inflict such harm.

Administrative offices of two of the hospitals and the court in Tabuk were closed for the Saudi weekend beginning Thursday and could not be reached for comment. A copy of the medical report from King Khaled Hospital in Tabuk said the same injury Mr. Mutairi suffered from could be inflicted on his attacker using a nerve stimulant, and inducing the same injuries in the same locations.

Saudi Arabia enforces strict Islamic law and occasionally metes out punishments based on the ancient legal code of an eye for an eye. But King Abdullah has been trying to tamp down extremist ideology, including religious decrees issued by unauthorized clerics.

The query by the court, among the most extreme to have been made public in the Saudi kingdom, highlights the delicate effort to balance a push to modernize the country with strict interpretations of religious traditions.

“We are asking for our legal right under Islamic law,” said Khaled al-Mutairi, 27. “There is no better word than God’s word, an eye for an eye.”

The guy has already served 2 years in jail, presumably, under the Saudi civil justice system and now is going to face punishment under their sharia system.

What the victims want is revenge, not justice.

We should be glad we have laws against cruel and unusual punishments here in the US. And freedom from religion.

..
 
Last edited:

DesiPower

Lifer
Nov 22, 2008
15,299
740
126
eeewwww.... sent a chill down my spine... how can a human being do that in cold blood... FVCK
 

Xenon

Senior member
Oct 16, 1999
774
16
81
Making a point of this where the ultimate eye for an eye ie. the death penalty is so common makes absolutely no sense at all.
 

ForumMaster

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2005
7,792
1
0
There is also something called the Hippocratic Oath. Something that i must say i'm not surprised is not religiously upheld by all hospitals in the Islamic world. It is refreshing to see that some hospitals declined, but that even a single doctor would agree, is horrible.

Doctors are not allowed to harm patients.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
Eye for an eye is not so bad. Think about all those wall street types who managed to screw the american taxpayer. I can think of some good punishment in return.
 

ichy

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2006
6,940
8
81
Go to google news search, read up about a guy named Peter Cantu (executed this week by the state of Texas) and what he did to a couple of teenage girls in the early 1990s. Some people deserve cruel punishment.
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,825
3,776
136
What's that saying "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." Would surely explain the state of a lot of these bass-ackwards countries.
 

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
Go to google news search, read up about a guy named Peter Cantu (executed this week by the state of Texas) and what he did to a couple of teenage girls in the early 1990s. Some people deserve cruel punishment.

That just made me sick to my stomach. Lethal injection was way to easy for what he put those girls through. Christ, thats just unimaginable. :(:(:(
 

MotF Bane

No Lifer
Dec 22, 2006
60,801
10
0
Go to google news search, read up about a guy named Peter Cantu (executed this week by the state of Texas) and what he did to a couple of teenage girls in the early 1990s. Some people deserve cruel punishment.

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
 

GroundedSailor

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,502
0
76
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Unfortunately thats the law in the US but not in Saudi Arabia.

Such a punishment wouldn'tr even be contemplated here. In SA the radical elements still have a upper hand in society, hence such issues are still to be had.

..
 

ichy

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2006
6,940
8
81
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

I know it's unconstitutional, however I think that an outright prohibition on cruel punishment in the Bill of Rights was a mistake. As long as the punishment is proportional to the crime that was committed then IMO it ought to be legal.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
34,971
9,059
136
This is an example of our moral superiority, if anyone wishes to question it. Yes we aren't perfect, we make mistakes, we screw up, but we do NOT sanction something like this.

Reminds me of stoning.
 

Orignal Earl

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2005
8,059
55
86
This is an example of our moral superiority, if anyone wishes to question it. Yes we aren't perfect, we make mistakes, we screw up, but we do NOT sanction something like this.

Reminds me of stoning.

Yep, I agree, the US is morally superior over Saudi Arabia.

Do you agree all the countries of the West are morally superior over the US?
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,224
659
126
I know it's unconstitutional, however I think that an outright prohibition on cruel punishment in the Bill of Rights was a mistake. As long as the punishment is proportional to the crime that was committed then IMO it ought to be legal.

Wow, scary.
 

MotF Bane

No Lifer
Dec 22, 2006
60,801
10
0
This is an example of our moral superiority, if anyone wishes to question it. Yes we aren't perfect, we make mistakes, we screw up, but we do NOT sanction something like this.

Reminds me of stoning.

Governing based on morals is subjective.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,345
11,754
136
I know it's unconstitutional, however I think that an outright prohibition on cruel punishment in the Bill of Rights was a mistake. As long as the punishment is proportional to the crime that was committed then IMO it ought to be legal.

Signed up for that executioner job yet?