SATA 300?

Touareg

Junior Member
Dec 22, 2003
13
0
0
If I purchase SATA drives today (ie. Raptor 74 gigs), will they run at SATA 300 sometime in the future if plugged into a SATA 300 controller?

Thanks!
 

jdogg707

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2002
6,098
0
76
I don't think they will....kind of like ATA100 won't run at ATA133 on an ATA133 channel.
 

InlineFive

Diamond Member
Sep 20, 2003
9,599
2
0
Nothing will probably be up to snuff to really make use of SATA300. Only RAID-0 Raptors have breached 150MB/s as it is.
 

SocrPlyr

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,513
0
0
Originally posted by: PorBleemo
Nothing will probably be up to snuff to really make use of SATA300. Only RAID-0 Raptors have breached 150MB/s as it is.
Which means it still doesn't matter b/c each cable gets 150MB/s so we still have to wait until a single drive can break the speed.

Josh
 

Pariah

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2000
7,357
20
81
Yes, it will. SATA standards are designed to be backwards compatible. There's a pretty good chance that SATA I drives won't work on SAS controllers, but they will work on SATA II controllers.
 

Ionizer86

Diamond Member
Jun 20, 2001
5,292
0
76
They won't run at 300, but the SATA 300 will be backwards compatible. It doesn't really matter, so don't worry about it. The main limit for hard drives is the mechanics. I'd like to see an ATA100 or 133 drive sustain over 70MB/s transfer. Basically not gonna happen yet.
 

stranger707

Member
Apr 6, 2000
140
0
0
It would be a waste of money. There isn't a drive on the market these days that even comes close to 150. Serial ATA is a real con job right now. Have you noticed how all of the specs say "up to 150 MB/sec? There isn't a manufacturer out there that is listing the true specifications for their drives and controllers.
 

Pariah

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2000
7,357
20
81
SATA II will support more than one drive per cable, so all the extra bandwidth won't necessarily go to waste. By the time it is released, 2 highend drives will likely be able to saturate SATA I at peak throughput.
 

Adul

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
32,999
44
91
danny.tangtam.com
Originally posted by: Pariah
SATA II will support more than one drive per cable, so all the extra bandwidth won't necessarily go to waste. By the time it is released, 2 highend drives will likely be able to saturate SATA I at peak throughput.
high end such as a ramdrive :p
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
Originally posted by: Adul
Originally posted by: Pariah
SATA II will support more than one drive per cable, so all the extra bandwidth won't necessarily go to waste. By the time it is released, 2 highend drives will likely be able to saturate SATA I at peak throughput.
high end such as a ramdrive :p

If you can chain 3 drives, then you'd need 225MB/s to handle them, which is more than SATA's 150MB/s.

Hell, a Raptor that has a peak of 74MB/s, if used on a SATA-II daisy chain with another Raptor would suck up 150MB/s bandwidth, so you're at the limit if you only have 2 drivers per chain, and even if the limit was 150MB/s, burst rates for the Raptor might mean it coul dexceed the available bandwidth, so 150MB/s SATA would be a bottleneck :p
 

Agamar

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,334
0
0
We will probably start getting better rates when they start adding gobs of ram to the hard drives (like 32M +). Already getting drives with 8M and I think there is a toshiba laptop drive with 16.
 

Pariah

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2000
7,357
20
81
Originally posted by: Lonyo

If you can chain 3 drives, then you'd need 225MB/s to handle them, which is more than SATA's 150MB/s.

Hell, a Raptor that has a peak of 74MB/s, if used on a SATA-II daisy chain with another Raptor would suck up 150MB/s bandwidth, so you're at the limit if you only have 2 drivers per chain, and even if the limit was 150MB/s, burst rates for the Raptor might mean it coul dexceed the available bandwidth, so 150MB/s SATA would be a bottleneck :p

Thanx for saving me the effort. Happy holidays to everyone.