- Jun 2, 2012
- 6,470
- 32
- 91
Saw this while browsing Newegg reviews on Sapphire 7950's, I'm a bit behind on the whole ASIC score thing, has this all been settled already?
"Even with an ASIC value of 55.4%, it seemed pretty decent. Although, I'm starting to wonder if these card were intended for the Vapor-X line but had terrible ASIC score. I actually ordered the exact same card for a customer build and it had an ASIC value of 58%. Very poor ASIC quality (< 60%) for both cards that I bought."
"Even with an ASIC value of 55.4%, it seemed pretty decent. Although, I'm starting to wonder if these card were intended for the Vapor-X line but had terrible ASIC score. I actually ordered the exact same card for a customer build and it had an ASIC value of 58%. Very poor ASIC quality (< 60%) for both cards that I bought."
Manufacturer Response:GPUZ "ASIC Quality" is not an actual measurement of PCB quality.
It is a calculation based on the voltages and clocks of the across the card and then compared to a reference design.
You will generally find that a card with lower "ASIC Quality" will overclock a lot better than cards with higher "ASIC Quality".
This is usually due to revised PCB designs with better VRM designs offer higher voltages and clocks which lower the "ASIC Quality" score.
This is supported and discussed in detail in many forums.
It is a calculation based on the voltages and clocks of the across the card and then compared to a reference design.
You will generally find that a card with lower "ASIC Quality" will overclock a lot better than cards with higher "ASIC Quality".
This is usually due to revised PCB designs with better VRM designs offer higher voltages and clocks which lower the "ASIC Quality" score.
This is supported and discussed in detail in many forums.