• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Santorum: McCain "doesn't understand" torture

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Undergoing some form of torture decades go does not mean he really does understand what they do now, though.
The tactics may be different but the effectiveness and psychological effects are the same.
 

CallMeJoe

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2004
6,938
5
81
I'm pro-torture. If I ever become a terrorist I agree to be tortured for information, so I am not being hypocritical in any way.
Excellent! I've just declared you a suspected terrorist, so prepare to meet your "Enhanced Interrogator"...
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,379
47,660
136
Enemy Belligerent Act

Anyone who supports, introduces or entertains invoking such unconstitutional nonsense should be brought up on charges of treason.


Damn, not sure how exactly I missed that story, but I'll agree with you here - that is clearly anathema to the Constitution and could be considered treason for those sworn to uphold it.

I still maintain that the label of coward doesn't apply to him though as his conduct in combat and in captivity indicates otherwise.
 

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
I'm pro-torture. If I ever become a terrorist I agree to be tortured for information, so I am not being hypocritical in any way.
Insurgents define US soldiers as being terrorists because they're occupying a country for no reason......

Are you suggesting it's ok for insurgents to torture US troops?
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,806
10,100
136
Insurgents define US soldiers as being terrorists because they're occupying a country for no reason......

Are you suggesting it's ok for insurgents to torture US troops?

He's saying they don't need permission and they already do.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Damn, not sure how exactly I missed that story, but I'll agree with you here - that is clearly anathema to the Constitution and could be considered treason for those sworn to uphold it.

I still maintain that the label of coward doesn't apply to him though as his conduct in combat and in captivity indicates otherwise.

Your right. I use the coward term just to be derogatory toward him.

As for the Santorum comparison to Bush, he may be smarter but he wants to continue the same policies.
 

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
I'm pro-torture. If I ever become a terrorist I agree to be tortured for information, so I am not being hypocritical in any way.

So do you agree to be tortured even if you aren't a terrorist? What if someone thinks you are one, but made a mistake? Because plenty of people have been tortured that are innocent.

I am guessing you do mind that, so your comment is ridiculous.
 
Last edited:

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
Strangely Santorum never used the word "torture"

Love how the media spins things.

Love how desperate people with no morals spin things.

Enhanced interrogation = torture.

But you know that, you just don't want to admit a fellow whack-job is wrong.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Excellent! I've just declared you a suspected terrorist, so prepare to meet your "Enhanced Interrogator"...

I don't believe I mentioned anything about torturing suspected terrorists. Its good to know that the left supports this though.
 

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
I don't believe I mentioned anything about torturing suspected terrorists. Its good to know that the left supports this though.

Well, the US tortured innocent people, it's a fact. You *cannot* only torture "guilty" people.

So again, you willing to be tortured for being in the wrong place at the wrong time? Case of mistaken identify? It's happened before.

I guess no, since chickenhawks don't like to suffer themselves, they only like to inflict it on others.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Insurgents define US soldiers as being terrorists because they're occupying a country for no reason......

Are you suggesting it's ok for insurgents to torture US troops?

I would argue that the term 'terrorist' has a distinct definition by civilized human beings. If a U.S. citizen/soldier was engaged in such activities I would not be opposed to using torture against them to deter further attacks. If you are going to agree with the insurgent definition of terrorist then you probably should support an immediate war crimes trial against Obama. Do you think Obama is a war criminal and should be tried as such or would you agree that civilized societies have the ability to differential between acts of terrorism and acts of war or self defense? Just as civilized human beings are able to determine the difference between a murderer and someone who shoots another person because they are threatening them, I think we can make a pretty clear distinction between a soldier engaged in war and a terrorist.

I realize the concept of right and wrong is pretty wishy washy in the left's mind. Its probably hard for you to conceptualize a soldier not being a terrorist, but for those of us with logical thought capabilities its quite easy to do.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
All the ones who support torture should have to endure it. They know they won't have to so its easy to hold such inhumane thoughts.

Ok, should all those who support abortion be forced to endure it? I consider that an inhumane act as well. Who gets to define inhumane, you? Why are you forcing your religious and moral views on me? You aren't one of those bible thumping teabaggers are you?

I also think anyone who is against capital punishment should be forced to have murderers live with them and their family to show their support. Seems only fair.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Well, the US tortured innocent people, it's a fact. You *cannot* only torture "guilty" people.

So again, you willing to be tortured for being in the wrong place at the wrong time? Case of mistaken identify? It's happened before.

I guess no, since chickenhawks don't like to suffer themselves, they only like to inflict it on others.

Well, the US has also convicted and incarcerated innocent people, its a fact. So should we stop sending people to jail since innocent people sometimes get convicted? Are you willing to go to jail for a crime you didn't commit because of mistaken identity or wrong place wrong time?

I guess no, so I can only assume you are pro-criminal like most liberals. Libtards don't like consequences, they only like it when its applied toward people who disagree with them.

This game is fun! :D
 

actuarial

Platinum Member
Jan 22, 2009
2,814
0
71
Ok, should all those who support abortion be forced to endure it? I consider that an inhumane act as well. Who gets to define inhumane, you? Why are you forcing your religious and moral views on me? You aren't one of those bible thumping teabaggers are you?

I also think anyone who is against capital punishment should be forced to have murderers live with them and their family to show their support. Seems only fair.

Holy straw man batman.

1) Comparing the legalization of a voluntary act to an involuntary one.

2) Portraying the alternative to capital punishment as having a murder living with your family. Well if they're not dead they must be living with the victim's families!
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,787
11,420
136
Just when you think that the lineup of possible GOP candidates couldn't make themselves look any more ridiculous ...
 

Zargon

Lifer
Nov 3, 2009
12,218
2
76
Holy straw man batman.

1) Comparing the legalization of a voluntary act to an involuntary one.

2) Portraying the alternative to capital punishment as having a murder living with your family. Well if they're not dead they must be living with the victim's families!

I might be lost, but did you just refer to abortion as a involuntary act?
 

dabuddha

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
19,579
17
81
Insurgents define US soldiers as being terrorists because they're occupying a country for no reason......

Are you suggesting it's ok for insurgents to torture US troops?

They usually just murder them instead.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
I would argue that the term 'terrorist' has a distinct definition by civilized human beings. . . .

I'd love to have you set forth that definition, for I think the term terrorist is frankly quite overused. Nearly every single tinpot dictatorship contends revolutionaries or even demonstrators are terrorists.

Then we can progress to the issue of the USA executing Japanese for waterboarding during WW II as war criminals. Too bad they didn't know the neocon politically correct term back then, we would have had to release them and pat them on the back instead.