Gibsons
Lifer
- Aug 14, 2001
- 12,530
- 35
- 91
oh dear.Originally posted by: gsellis
That will then mean Greenbay will move to San Franciso later. That will make them the San Francisco Packers.
At least there isn't a team called Oilers anymore.
oh dear.Originally posted by: gsellis
That will then mean Greenbay will move to San Franciso later. That will make them the San Francisco Packers.
hissy fit...anyway, are you in the area. Across the street is kind of vague.Originally posted by: Cruisin1
Originally posted by: foghorn67
I would love an Anaheim NFL team....but where? The newish Angel Stadium was 'baseball' only in mind. I prefer this over the poor hybrid stadiums of the 70's. No way can it host a football game. Will they tear it down for a football team, and make both venues akward again?
I am thinking of where Anaheim would put up a new stadium, nothing is coming to mind.
Read the article... says across the street from Angels stadium.
Originally posted by: Gibsons
oh dear.Originally posted by: gsellis
That will then mean Greenbay will move to San Franciso later. That will make them the San Francisco Packers.
At least there isn't a team called Oilers anymore.
thatbuilding a privately financed stadium
The city was not going to contribute any money to the stadium but was willing to possibly help with some of the infrastructure costs.
Originally posted by: Kelvrick
I don't know too many of the details, butthatbuilding a privately financed stadiumThe city was not going to contribute any money to the stadium but was willing to possibly help with some of the infrastructure costs.
sounds a lot better then what the Kings were trying to get over here in Sacramento.
600-800 million for infrastructure costs would make me reconsider building it in SF too.
York said the team would not change its name under any circumstances.
"Nothing will persuade us to change the name of the San Francisco 49ers, one of the most storied brands in the world of sports," he said.
