Sandy Bridge Vs Ivy Bridge Benchmark Deathmatch

Don Karnage

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,865
0
0
Calling all Sandy Bridge owners. Would you care to run benchmarks from speeds ranging from 4.5-4.8ghz so we could directly compare them to Ivy Bridge? Let's come up with a list of benchmarks that anyone can easily aquire and agree on memory speeds and timing.
 

grkM3

Golden Member
Jul 29, 2011
1,407
0
0
why limit it to where ivy tops out at on water or air? what is the point of that as we all know clock for clock ivy is faster,but I can bench my sandy at 5300-5400 on water all day.
 

podspi

Golden Member
Jan 11, 2011
1,982
102
106
If we're going to do a deathmatch, I say a deathmatch. Fastest 24/7 OC wins...
 

grkM3

Golden Member
Jul 29, 2011
1,407
0
0
a death match is ivy vs sandy no limits on clocks and the highest bench wins.

Why handicap a sandy cpu with limits that dont effect ivys at all?
 
Last edited:

grkM3

Golden Member
Jul 29, 2011
1,407
0
0
Ill start with a litte cinbench.this was done with a 2600k

1024wj.jpg
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
To much variations in HW setups not to mention reviewers have done this already so it's a waste of time - with same boards - same video cards - same SSD. Real apples to apples and already been done.
 

aaksheytalwar

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2012
3,389
0
76
No point unless you do clocks which can be run at load 24 7. For ivy and SB both it is sub 4.8

Do stock vs stock, 4.0 ghz, 4.4ghz, 4.8ghz
 

TidusZ

Golden Member
Nov 13, 2007
1,765
2
81
To much variations in HW setups not to mention reviewers have done this already so it's a waste of time - with same boards - same video cards - same SSD. Real apples to apples and already been done.

true.
 

Hatisherrif

Senior member
May 10, 2009
226
0
0
Ye throw it in there, we had some nice graphs going too :D

Yeah, no need to thread spam. For those who are interested, these were our results:

chartnt.jpg


And I'm sick of the Sandy/Ivy deal already. We all know the facts: Ivy is 5-10% better per clock, a bit hotter and less tolerant of higher voltages (right?).


You can see the i5 2500K vs i5 3570K in 7zip in this graph :)
 

aaksheytalwar

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2012
3,389
0
76
Ivy is mostly 5-10% better but at times it touches or crosses 15% ips as well. Besides not every SB hits 4.5 while ivy does easily if you have the cooling
 

Hatisherrif

Senior member
May 10, 2009
226
0
0
You can never say that every CPU will hit a certain clockspeed since there is no guarantee, but most of the time Sandy Bridge hits at least 4.5.

Ivy does easily? Boy, does that come at a price :D
 

Rvenger

Elite Member <br> Super Moderator <br> Video Cards
Apr 6, 2004
6,283
5
81
Yeah, no need to thread spam. For those who are interested, these were our results:

chartnt.jpg


And I'm sick of the Sandy/Ivy deal already. We all know the facts: Ivy is 5-10% better per clock, a bit hotter and less tolerant of higher voltages (right?).


You can see the i5 2500K vs i5 3570K in 7zip in this graph :)


Seeing those results, I should get meself a bulldozer!
 

LagunaX

Senior member
Jan 7, 2010
716
0
76
Ivy does hit 4.5ghz pretty easily I've had both the 3570k and 3770k.
1.2-1.25v with mid to high range air cooling is sufficient.

4.6ghz - 4.7ghz needs high end air.
4.7ghz+ definitely needs liquid.
 

Absolute0

Senior member
Nov 9, 2005
714
21
81
might as well bench at the top frequency for both... I can bench my Sandy at 5.2 using 1.44v... never tried higher, this was before I saw that everyone benches with 1.5v. I think an Ivy would have to break 4.9 to be equivalent though.

I don't think Ivy is the greatest for benching on air/water... I got one for a powerful, efficient 24/7 machine with some serious longevity.