• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sandy Bridge to launch on January 5th.

Patrick Wolf

Platinum Member
Article mentions a Jan. 5th launch @ CES is very likely. Furthermore wiki shows a Jan. 5th release.

Intel CEO Confirms Q1 Launch For Sandy Bridge Processors.

CEO Paul Otellini Wednesday in a COMDEXvirtual session confirmed an "early first quarter" launch date for the chip giant's eagerly awaited Sandy Bridge processor lineup.
Otellini is expected to officially unleash the new Sandy Bridge processors at his CES keynote on January 5.

During his COMDEXvirtual session, Otellini said that Sandy Bridge, which integrates graphics on the processor, will power a new generation of video streaming collaboration.

"What this product was engineered for was the optimized video visual experience," said Otellini in a 30 minute question and answer session with Intel Vice President Steve Dallman, who oversees the chip giant's channel. "And I think that things that would take you minutes to do on our latest chip that we are shipping today will be seconds on Sandy Bridge in terms of video compression. It really is a revolution in this (video) area. And when you look at the integration of the graphics (on a single chip) it just makes it even better"

Otellini compared the Sandy Bridge quantum leap to breakthrough that Intel powered 17 years ago when it introduced the revolutionary Pentium processor product.

"It (Sandy Bridge) is a 486 to Pentium kind of jump," said Otellini. "What the Pentium did was enable the beginning of the multimedia (computing) era by virture of capabilities built into it. It was the right product at the right time. We are now about to move to the era of visualization - we may be in the middle of that movement today- where everything is about video whether it is consumer or corporate. It is going to be about not just watching video but sharing video and video conferencing."

Marc Fertik, sales director for ACE Technology, one of Intel's top system builders, said Intel made excellent progress when the company implemented high definition graphics on the Core i series processors, but Sandy Bridge takes it to the next level. "This is going to make high end video and graphics applications more affordable for everyone," said Fertik.

ACE is expecting to show off the new Sandy Bridge based systems in its booth at CES, said Fertik. He praised Intel for bringing technology advances to the market that will make video streaming mainstream for more home and business users.

In a live question and answer session with solution providers hosted by Everything Channel Senior Vice President of Strategic Content Robert DeMarzo, Dallman said CES would be an "opportune time" to launch Sandy Bridge. He said that Intel has already started "seeding" the channel with Sandy Bridge components and boards. "They are under embargo until the launch date," he said.

Dallman said Intel is pushing for system builders to lead the Sandy Bridge transition rather than the tier one multinational PC makers. He expects the system builder to convert as much as 80 percent from the current Core processor lineup to Sandy Bridge over the course of the next year.

"Our heart is always on the side of the system builders," said Dallman. "They are the ones that bring products to market very, very quickly and they are the ones that lead on (product) launches. They are our premier focus in getting the Sandy Bridge launch out there."
 
Last edited:
Based on the article, am I correct in assuming that there will be some sort of NDA preventing reviews until that time?
Additionally, does this merely mean that information for it will be available at that time, or will Sandy Bridge products actually be sold at retail?
 
I'm hoping to get details on 2011 at ces, atleast a demo. But Idk about the 486->Pentium statement, that seems like a exaggeration.
 
Based on the article, am I correct in assuming that there will be some sort of NDA preventing reviews until that time?
Additionally, does this merely mean that information for it will be available at that time, or will Sandy Bridge products actually be sold at retail?

Not sure. I mean there's plenty of info on SB already, not much else to know except pricing and reviews so yeah I'd expect actual products. If not that exact day then probably the next day or very shortly after.
 
Last edited:
I'm hoping to get details on 2011 at ces, atleast a demo. But Idk about the 486->Pentium statement, that seems like a exaggeration.

Considering that Paul Otellini was the general manager of the Microprocessor Products Group at the time when Pentium was released in 1993...you are kinda getting a statement from one of the few guys who would actually know whether the statement has merit or if it is an exaggeration.
 
As I've read it, the 486->Pentium comparison is because of the better integrated video, so the 'quantum leap' won't be seen by people with discrete GPUs. Maybe if they bring something Optimus-like to desktops...
 
As I've read it, the 486->Pentium comparison is because of the better integrated video, so the 'quantum leap' won't be seen by people with discrete GPUs. Maybe if they bring something Optimus-like to desktops...

I was thinking the same thing. It sounds to me like he is touting major advancements coming from GPU acceleration inside SB (i.e., focus on video/visual innovation). But we have already had that with discrete GPUs for years. I think the great revolution in processors on the Intel side came from P4 --> C2D. My E6400 @ 3.4ghz was more than 2x faster than my P4 2.6@ 3.0ghz. SB looks like to be around 15-20% faster than 1st generation i7 processors, which is good, but not unexpected.
 
It's such torture having to wait to see actual benchmarks. Especially since I'd expect that it'll follow the same timeline as the arrandale/clarkdale launch at the start of 2010 - reviews were the Monday before CES, and I believe that products were available for sale right on the launch date.

I do find the current Intel release schedule interesting. They're intentionally waiting until after two of the major buying cycles (back to school and Christmas), which lets old inventory get cleaned out by those who are going to buy something anyway. And better yet, if a release date is missed for some odd reason, it doesn't as much since they're not missing out on a higher sales period. Only 'downside' is in cases like the current, where Sandybridge is likely ready to go, leaving some two months worth of manufacturing and stockpiling inventory of it before the release.
 
Only 'downside' is in cases like the current, where Sandybridge is likely ready to go, leaving some two months worth of manufacturing and stockpiling inventory of it before the release.

They also have another reason to do this. Their graphics driver side is weak. The hardware being early allows more time for driver optimizations. According to most enthusiasts, they are waiting for the Q2/11 parts anyway.
 
I'm hoping to get details on 2011 at ces, atleast a demo. But Idk about the 486->Pentium statement, that seems like a exaggeration.

Considering that Paul Otellini was the general manager of the Microprocessor Products Group at the time when Pentium was released in 1993...you are kinda getting a statement from one of the few guys who would actually know whether the statement has merit or if it is an exaggeration.


Reading the 1st post these things stand out to me:

"in terms of video compression"

"What the Pentium did was enable the beginning of the multimedia (computing) era by virture of capabilities built into it."


We've seen the Anandtech preview on SB but I don't think we've seen demos (apart from the Intel video) of programs using the AVX extensions.


The way it is worded suggests part of the cpu is what he is referring to and not the added gpu. This part also supports that:

"And when you look at the integration of the graphics (on a single chip) it just makes it even better"
 
Reading the 1st post these things stand out to me:

"in terms of video compression"

"What the Pentium did was enable the beginning of the multimedia (computing) era by virture of capabilities built into it."


We've seen the Anandtech preview on SB but I don't think we've seen demos (apart from the Intel video) of programs using the AVX extensions.


The way it is worded suggests part of the cpu is what he is referring to and not the added gpu. This part also supports that:

"And when you look at the integration of the graphics (on a single chip) it just makes it even better"

I agree, and he is clearly speaking to the "era" of pentium and not saying "on day one this will be the shizzle". Whatever is inside SB it will take a while for the software to catch up and really begin to be enabled by it.

There were some considerable differences between the 486 and the Pentium, but as with all new architectures the ultimate performance numbers do depend on software recompiling and operating clockspeeds.

Saying the slowest clocked pentium (60MHz) wasn't faster than a 486 means one has missed the entire point Otellini was aiming to make regarding the analogy as it extends to SB versus westmere.
 
Who needs benchmarks anyway. SB Quad core's are going to rival Gulftown in some Apps

24397.png
 
I look forward to barely selling my i7 920 on the used market, losing a crapton of cash to paypal and shipping, and subsequently seeing virtually no improvement in SC2, WoW, or when sexting my girlfriend over IM.

Can't wait!
 
Considering that Paul Otellini was the general manager of the Microprocessor Products Group at the time when Pentium was released in 1993...you are kinda getting a statement from one of the few guys who would actually know whether the statement has merit or if it is an exaggeration.
He's certainly in a position to know, but not in a position to necessarily tell the absolute truth since he does want to generate good PR for Intel.
 
Who needs benchmarks anyway. SB Quad core's are going to rival Gulftown in some Apps

24397.png

Not just some apps, most apps.

I'm willing to bet that the i7-2600 beats the i7-990X in more than half the benchmarks when we get the full AT review, though the i7-990X will win by much larger margins in the benchmarks where it is faster.
 
Last edited:
They also have another reason to do this. Their graphics driver side is weak. The hardware being early allows more time for driver optimizations. According to most enthusiasts, they are waiting for the Q2/11 parts anyway.

You mean Q3 parts? Socket 2011? That's what I am waiting for....
 
Well personally i dont care much as i just upgraded to a i7 rig and plan to keep it 3-4 years these SB CPU's will be great for general purpose mid budget builds for family/friends.

I think that the integrated graphics getting more powerful is the way to go in the future for both intel and AMD. If they can get it up to say 4670 level graphics most people will not need discreet cards and OEMs will love it as it will save money. I think there will always be a high end discreet card market though for enthusiasts who are hardcore gamers or people who want more displays than the integrated will allow.
 
I look forward to barely selling my i7 920 on the used market, losing a crapton of cash to paypal and shipping, and subsequently seeing virtually no improvement in SC2, WoW, or when sexting my girlfriend over IM.

Can't wait!

Or you just don't sell it and wait until Haswell 😉
 
Not just some apps, most apps.

I'm willing to bet that the i7-2600 beats the i7-990X in more than half the benchmarks when we get the full AT review, though the i7-990X will win by much larger margins in the benchmarks where it is faster.

ummmm..

im wiling to bet at stock conditions ur correct...

However the 990X in OC potential... umm...

Shoot i need to finish the review so you guys can see.

Lets say im @ 4.5 /w HT ON @ 1.315v vcore and 1.21v VTT. 🙂

And so far number crunching wise... i have yet to error.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top