Aside from platform enhancements, there is little incentive for us Sandy/Ivy users to switch to Haswell/Broadwell. I'd at least wait and see what Skylake offers, before making a switch. PCIe 3.0 capable PCH sounds nice.
You should think about upgrading that GPU before, but I'd wait until Maxwell/Pirate Islands hits sometime this autumn (we hope)...
Ha! Wish I'd heard about that when I bought my GTX 780 Asus Direct-II-whatchamacallem in January. Indeed it was a vast improvement for the SB-K.
I'm re-evaluating my "enthusiast-enthusiasm." I have too many computers; I just refurbished a refurbished laptop and sent my friend the check. I'm going to squeeze as much as possible from my "Old" toys for a while.
For speed in Ghz referencing the 4790K comparison, I believe what Homeles says. There would be improvements in the power-consumption and the instruction set with Haswell or Broadwell. There might even be overall better performance or at least benchmark performance. But I'm guessing they're still incremental, only adding to the increments of Ivy and Haswell.
I think mainstream computing "needs" have extended the usefulness of older hardware. Unless you do bleeding-edge gaming, even LGA-775 systems updated with an SSD boot drive are quite adequate. Rendering, gaming, and other CPU-intensive tasks -- you might want to get the latest-greatest, but I don't think you'd notice any deprivations with an OC'd Sandy Bridge. It's been now three years with my sig-rig, and I'm still marveling at what a dream-machine it is. Sort of like looking at CNN's Frederika Whitfield when she announces she's 50 years old. [Did that make Joan Rivers green with envy? or was she just mad about the animal-rights thing?]
FWIW -- Few months ago, we posted our Cinebench scores on a thread here. My rig was neck-and-neck with an i7-4770K -- latter OC'd to 4.4 Ghz.
[written and submitted by an '07 Centrino-Duo]