Sandra scores for Commodore 64, Timex Sinclair, Vic-20

dalfollo

Senior member
Jan 10, 2001
452
0
0
i am looking for Sandra CPU/General speed scores for the following PCs:

- Timex Sinclair (T-2000 i believe)
- Comodore Vic-20 w/ cassette drive
- Commodore 64 w/ 5.25 Floppy drive
- Pentium 133 w/16MB memory 1.2 HD

any info or good guesses appreciated.
fyi, i am thinking of upgrading them... :)

 

dalfollo

Senior member
Jan 10, 2001
452
0
0
yes i understand that...i was wondering if anyone has some very good guesses...
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
I still have a working Commodore 64. If there is a way to bench it let me know...
 

sharkeeper

Lifer
Jan 13, 2001
10,886
2
0
Do you realise how long it would take to run the tests on those slow ass cpu's??? ;)

Unless it scales with speed to avoid that, your current pc would be about as archaic is the C64 is today when it finished!

Cheers!
 

XeonTux

Golden Member
Dec 4, 2000
1,475
0
0
LMAO

The best thing you could do is write a program in native assembly on each platform to perform the same set of calculations.
 

Cessna172

Member
Jan 8, 2001
183
0
0
Commodore 64s rule! I still have my old 64 and 128. I can't even guess what the benchmark would be, but considering the CPU ran at 1.02(!)Mhz, it would be ridiculously low.

I remember the good old days of having to wait 5 minutes for a program to boot up.

By the way, here's a link to a bunch of specs on old machines:

http://www.myoldcomputers.com/museum/computerlist.htm

 

dalfollo

Senior member
Jan 10, 2001
452
0
0
my dad was interested in understanding what the increases have ben for the last15 years and how my current system does better than my old...my dad says that just saying my current system (1.0 ghz TB/512MB/46gb) is 'much faster' doesn't fully convey the increase i currently have...thanks for the link...
 

Cessna172

Member
Jan 8, 2001
183
0
0
Dalfollo, just to give you some perspective on how far we've come since the introduction of the original PC, let me paraphrase Scott Mueller, author of *the* PC hardware bible, Upgrading and Repairing PCs, 12th ed. He says that a 500MHz Pentium II-based system is 4000 times faster than the original 8088-based 4.77Mhz IBM PC. The reason why this is, is that you can't compare chips soley based on MHz. Because today's chips can execute many more instructions per clock cycle (hz) than older chips. Thus, even though 500 is only about 100 times more than 4.77, the actual processing speed is 4000 times that of the original 8088. Now, this is just processor speed. If you take into account the fact that today's machines have their own graphics processors that handle 3D graphics, etc., the number is much, much, higher. Plus, he is just referencing a 500Mhz PII. Your 1GHz chip is, of course, at least 8000 times more powerful than the original PC, and a HELL of a lot faster than any Commodore 64, of course. I would guess your machine has got to have at LEAST the power of 40,000 Commodore 64s. And you've certainly got 8,000 times more RAM. And 287,500 times more disk space than a Commodore floppy.
 

TravisBickle

Platinum Member
Dec 3, 2000
2,037
0
0
yep, that's progress! whilst most of us used to use the 8bit computers for playing Elite and maybe typing a letter now most use the PC for playing freespace 2, downloading porn and... typing letters!
 

Cessna172

Member
Jan 8, 2001
183
0
0


<< yep, that's progress! whilst most of us used to use the 8bit computers for playing Elite and maybe typing a letter now most use the PC for playing freespace 2, downloading porn and... typing letters! >>



LMAO
 

TravisBickle

Platinum Member
Dec 3, 2000
2,037
0
0
I would have thought that the 16 bit Amiga and ST were more interesting. they are still usable, or at least playable with their reasonable graphics, sound, and most of all disk drives.

oh I geddit, trying to make you dad feel better about his empty wallet ;)