San Fransisians say only criminals can have guns 11-9-05

[dmcowen674]

Well this is one way to pare down the Gay population.

It will be open hunting season on themselves since they won't have a gun to defend themselves.

Population control at it's best.

They helped out the Republican cause to get rid of them.

I have no sympathy for them on this one.

How can three Cities clearly violate and throw out the Constitution on right of arms???

Hopefully the NRA continues to fight to restore the Constitution in these three cities.

11-9-2005 San Francisco Voters Approve Handgun Ban

SAN FRANCISCO - Voters approved ballot measures to ban handguns in San Francisco

The gun ban prohibits the manufacture and sale of all firearms and ammunition in the city, and makes it illegal for residents to keep handguns in their homes or businesses.

Only two other major U.S. cities ? Washington and Chicago ? have implemented such sweeping handgun bans.

Although law enforcement, security guards and others who require weapons for work are exempt from the measure, current handgun owners would have to surrender their firearms by April.

 

[Ronstang]

And the first time a crime is comitted with a handgun, or someone is shot, the government officials will sit around scratching their heads saying "but we banned handguns, how could this happen?".

 

[Proletariat]

Dave, do you really stand for anything?

 

[dmcowen674]

Originally posted by: Proletariat
Dave, do you really stand for anything?

Awwwwwww you're practicing for when I'm on the Campaign trail, how sweet of you. :thumbsup:

I'm truly touched

 

[judasmachine]

I don't know if categorically banning guns is a good idea. I don't like them, and laws like Florida's scare me, but I just don't think it's a good idea. Maybe I am part libetarian.

 

[GoPackGo]

That law should be found unconstitutional.

Hopefully no one in SF has a handgun collection, that would have to go as well.

And handguns aren't cheap...is the city going to compensate people?

 

[Ronstang]

Originally posted by: GoPackGo
That law should be found unconstitutional.

Hopefully no one in SF has a handgun collection, that would have to go as well.

And handguns aren't cheap...is the city going to compensate people?

It is California. They will probalby confiscate them, sell them on the open market, and declare the proceeds for the public good. This legislation is a perfect example of why you should not have to register a gun. If they tried this crap in Texas they wouldn'd find 1/10 the guns.

 

[cKGunslinger]

People should be just as outraged over this travesty as they are over the same-sex marriage bans that are passing. Majority rule = sh1t, especially when the majority is apparently a bunch of moronic sheep.

 

[0roo0roo]

stupid waste of time. its called politicians wasting time so you won't notice they aren't doing anything productive.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674
They helped out the Republican cause to get rid of them.

Hopefully the NRA continues to fight to restore the Constitution in these three cities.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: Proletariat
Dave, do you really stand for anything?

Awwwwwww you're practicing for when I'm on the Campaign trail, how sweet of you. :thumbsup:

I'm truly touched

Who touched you, and where

 

[Moonbeam]

This will be found unconstitutional since it was particularly and obviously written to pretend it is not. San Francisco already passsed a measure that was shot down.

 

[Warthog912]

Something to the likes of this would never, and I mean NEVER pass down here. I know many a people whom you would have to pry their guns out of their cold, dead hands. Myself included-

 

[zendari]

Yup dave, the Republicans really have huge control over superfundamentalistwackoliberal San Fran.

The only thing good about San Fransicso is Barry Bonds.

 

[EatSpam]

Idiots. I wish more states would take a look at Florida and Texas gun laws.... about the only things those two states do right.

 

[JulesMaximus]

Originally posted by: GoPackGo
That law should be found unconstitutional.

Hopefully no one in SF has a handgun collection, that would have to go as well.

And handguns aren't cheap...is the city going to compensate people?

No kidding. If that happened here I think I'd have to find a relative in another area to hold my gun collection for me.

Hopefully this will be found unconstitutional.

 

[Moonbeam]

Only our guns keep the Supreme Coup from stealing our elections.

 

[dmcowen674]

Originally posted by: zendari
Yup dave, the Republicans really have huge control over superfundamentalistwackoliberal San Fran.

It's not a case of Republican or Democrat or Liberals in San Fransissy.

It's just a matter of too many gurls. They are just too wussy.

I leave them alone excpet when they trash the Constitution.

 

[zendari]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: zendari
Yup dave, the Republicans really have huge control over superfundamentalistwackoliberal San Fran.

It's not a case of Republican or Democrat or Liberals in San Fransissy.

It's just a matter of too many gurls. They are just too wussy.

I leave them alone excpet when they trash the Constitution.

So if its a Red State, Republicans are causing the problem.

If its a blue state, its not the case of Republicans or Democrats.

Gotcha.

Interstingly you don't leave the ID schools in Kansas alone.

 

[skygod99]

Originally posted by: EatSpam
Idiots. I wish more states would take a look at Florida and Texas gun laws.... about the only things those two states do right.

/agree

I guess the knobs in SF dont realizse that once you rip the 2nd Amendment out, all the other become null and void after that.

Its really pathetic..

 

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: skygod99

Originally posted by: EatSpam
Idiots. I wish more states would take a look at Florida and Texas gun laws.... about the only things those two states do right.

/agree

I guess the knobs in SF dont realizse that once you rip the 2nd Amendment out, all the other become null and void after that.

Its really pathetic..

The SF law provides for guns for their well regulated militia.

 

[K1052]

Yay, more gun laws to disarm the law-abiding.

 

[Train]

"San Fransisians"

lol

 

[GoPackGo]

The second ammendment:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed

Really is:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state.

The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

What part of "shall not be infringed" do these people not get?

 

[K1052]

Originally posted by: GoPackGo
The second ammendment:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed

Really is:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state.

The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

What part of "shall not be infringed" do these people not get?

Apparently you never got the memo that all constitutional rights are not created equal.