Samsung develops world's 5 MPX camera phone

Doggiedog

Lifer
Aug 17, 2000
12,780
5
81
And I'm sitting here in the US twiddling my thumbs just waiting for a good 1MP camera phone to come out. Unbelievable that Korea will have a 10MP by the end of the year.
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
63,031
19,317
136
Originally posted by: mpitts
I use my digital camera to take pictures.

Do you carry your digital camera around with you everywhere like people tend to do with their phones?
If/when I can get one of these, I might actually start carrying a cell phone.
 

randomlinh

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,846
2
0
linh.wordpress.com
a digital camera on a phone is nice for those "gotta have moments" with friends.. but that's about it... so a 5MP seems overboard I think. Am I trying to print big ol' posters w/ this? no. Work on better small optics w/ a 1-2MP camera, that I would really want.
 

Rallispec

Lifer
Jul 26, 2001
12,375
10
81
wonder what the lense on that thing is like. Seems like 5mp is doesnt really mean anything if your lense sucks- and i'm not sure how good of optics you can fit in a tiny camera phone. :confused:
 

TheAudit

Diamond Member
May 2, 2003
4,194
0
0
I rarely take any pictures with my Samsung camera phone because the pictures are always blurry washed out crap.
But I would definitely ditch my digital camera for this phone, or another one like it, if it took better pictures. Why not?
 

aceO07

Diamond Member
Nov 6, 2000
4,491
0
76
It's all marketing. People associate higher MP with better. I doubt the picture quality matches any regular 5MP camera, d-slr or point&shoot.

I just want a phone that works well and maybe has mp3 player. Forget the camera.
 

oogabooga

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2003
7,806
3
81
yea, another pointless invention pushing the frontier of what we can do with technology.. that's useless...
I think it's pretty cool, the phone seems ugly and i doubt i would use it - but i just got a camera phone (an LG vx6000) and i must admit, i am having a blast with it, if it was 5mp? man, i might actually be able to take some decent shots, not the same quality as a digital camera perhaps, but at least better than what i'm getting now.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: z0mb13
Originally posted by: Anubis
sweet another pointless invention

how is this pointless?

makes total sense to me

1) its a phone not a camera
2) the lens and sensor are so small that a 1mp P&S digital camera will take a better pic
3) it will be moronicly expensive
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: z0mb13
Originally posted by: Anubis
sweet another pointless invention

how is this pointless?

makes total sense to me

1) its a phone not a camera
2) the lens and sensor are so small that a 1mp P&S digital camera will take a better pic
3) it will be moronicly expensive

Imagine if someone said:
1) It's a clock, not a radio
2) The speaker and tuner will be so small that a $100 boom box will sound better
3) It will be moronicly expensive

 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: z0mb13
Originally posted by: Anubis
sweet another pointless invention

how is this pointless?

makes total sense to me

1) its a phone not a camera
2) the lens and sensor are so small that a 1mp P&S digital camera will take a better pic
3) it will be moronicly expensive

Imagine if someone said:
1) It's a clock, not a radio
2) The speaker and tuner will be so small that a $100 boom box will sound better
3) It will be moronicly expensive

thats a bad compairsion, IDK anyone who listnes to the radio from an alarm clock
but many people beleive their phone is a camera, every pic ive seen from camera phones is more or less crap

they shoudl work on makeing phones BETTER, better bat life, less dropped calls, better quality, before thet start adding useless features



 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
63,031
19,317
136
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Nebor
Imagine if someone said:
1) It's a clock, not a radio
2) The speaker and tuner will be so small that a $100 boom box will sound better
3) It will be moronicly expensive

thats a bad compairsion, IDK anyone who listnes to the radio from an alarm clock
but many people beleive their phone is a camera, every pic ive seen from camera phones is more or less crap

they shoudl work on makeing phones BETTER, better bat life, less dropped calls, better quality, before thet start adding useless features

Not everyone thinks it's useless, apparently. They seem to sell pretty well. While I doubt it would take the place of my Fuji, I'm also not going to carry my Fuji around on a daily basis. For me, the phone functionality is actually secondary on something like this, but does help justify buying one. A pocket-sized mp3 player with picture and video recording capabilities is useful to me, especially if the picture quality is at the least, decent.
 

z0mb13

Lifer
May 19, 2002
18,106
1
76
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: z0mb13
Originally posted by: Anubis
sweet another pointless invention

how is this pointless?

makes total sense to me

1) its a phone not a camera
2) the lens and sensor are so small that a 1mp P&S digital camera will take a better pic
3) it will be moronicly expensive

Imagine if someone said:
1) It's a clock, not a radio
2) The speaker and tuner will be so small that a $100 boom box will sound better
3) It will be moronicly expensive

thats a bad compairsion, IDK anyone who listnes to the radio from an alarm clock
but many people beleive their phone is a camera, every pic ive seen from camera phones is more or less crap

they shoudl work on makeing phones BETTER, better bat life, less dropped calls, better quality, before thet start adding useless features

cellphones are already pretty good in reception wise. the only crappy thing here in the states is the service... if u go to japan, or korea, or singapore, you will get full signal ANYWHERE. even underground


 

Hankerton

Golden Member
Apr 11, 2003
1,814
0
0
Yeah, unfortunately, you're only going to have to pay close to 5 BILLION Dollars for the damn thing.
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: z0mb13
Originally posted by: Anubis
sweet another pointless invention

how is this pointless?

makes total sense to me

1) its a phone not a camera
2) the lens and sensor are so small that a 1mp P&S digital camera will take a better pic
3) it will be moronicly expensive

1 Depends on 2.
2 Is unknown, likely, but unknown. Could take great pics for all you know, is there ex. of the pics it can take? What are you basing your comparison, to older models? That's hardly fair, this is the first 5MP one. Granted this is a likely conclusion...
3. By moronicly expensive you mean it's not going to have good value. However, that depends on cost/quality, which, again, is unknown.